The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2014-15 to 2015-16)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
7%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS
198
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
1%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
4%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
14%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
522
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
845
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 198
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
1%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
4%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
14%
Total Number of Core Classes
522
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
845
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
1%
High School Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
172
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
172
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
183
95%
170
99%
13
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
27%
51
30%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
38
20%
30
17%
8
38%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
10
5%
2
1%
8
38%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
3%
0
0%
5
19%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
Regents Diploma
183
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
27%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
38
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
172
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
172
Regents Diploma
170
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
51
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
17%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
13
62%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
8
38%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
19%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
172
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
172
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
183
95%
170
99%
13
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
27%
51
30%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
38
20%
30
17%
8
38%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
10
5%
2
1%
8
38%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
3%
0
0%
5
19%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
Regents Diploma
183
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
27%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
38
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
172
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
172
Regents Diploma
170
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
51
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
17%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
13
62%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
8
38%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
19%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
172
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
172
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
183
95%
170
99%
13
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
52
27%
51
30%
1
5%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
38
20%
30
17%
8
38%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
10
5%
2
1%
8
38%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
5
3%
0
0%
5
19%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
198
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
193
Regents Diploma
183
95%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
52
27%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
38
20%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
10
5%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
172
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
172
Regents Diploma
170
99%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
51
30%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
30
17%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
2
1%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
26
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
13
62%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
5%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
8
38%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
8
38%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
5
19%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
22
3%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
25
3%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
99
50%
96
56%
3
12%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
20%
30
17%
9
35%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
14
7%
12
7%
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
40
20%
29
17%
11
42%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
99
50%
To Two-Year College
39
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
14
7%
To Employment
40
20%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
96
56%
To Two-Year College
30
17%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
12
7%
To Employment
29
17%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
12%
To Two-Year College
9
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
2
8%
To Employment
11
42%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
99
50%
96
56%
3
12%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
20%
30
17%
9
35%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
14
7%
12
7%
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
40
20%
29
17%
11
42%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
99
50%
To Two-Year College
39
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
14
7%
To Employment
40
20%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
96
56%
To Two-Year College
30
17%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
12
7%
To Employment
29
17%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
12%
To Two-Year College
9
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
2
8%
To Employment
11
42%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
99
50%
96
56%
3
12%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
39
20%
30
17%
9
35%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
2
1%
1
1%
1
4%
TO THE MILITARY
14
7%
12
7%
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
40
20%
29
17%
11
42%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
99
50%
To Two-Year College
39
20%
To Other Post-Secondary
2
1%
To the Military
14
7%
To Employment
40
20%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
General Education
To Four-Year College
96
56%
To Two-Year College
30
17%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
1%
To the Military
12
7%
To Employment
29
17%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
2
1%
Plan Unknown
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
3
12%
To Two-Year College
9
35%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
4%
To the Military
2
8%
To Employment
11
42%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 189
LEVEL 1
43
23%
LEVEL 2
71
38%
LEVEL 3
60
32%
LEVEL 4
15
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 148
LEVEL 1
20
14%
LEVEL 2
58
39%
LEVEL 3
55
37%
LEVEL 4
15
10%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
23
56%
LEVEL 2
13
32%
LEVEL 3
5
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 167
LEVEL 1
36
22%
LEVEL 2
63
38%
LEVEL 3
54
32%
LEVEL 4
14
8%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
22
22%
LEVEL 2
34
33%
LEVEL 3
35
34%
LEVEL 4
11
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
21
24%
LEVEL 2
37
43%
LEVEL 3
25
29%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 189
LEVEL 1
43
23%
LEVEL 2
71
38%
LEVEL 3
60
32%
LEVEL 4
15
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
35
28%
LEVEL 2
48
39%
LEVEL 3
33
27%
LEVEL 4
8
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 65
LEVEL 1
8
12%
LEVEL 2
23
35%
LEVEL 3
27
42%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 188
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
189
148
41
12
1
5
4
167
5
102
87
189
124
65
1
188
PROFICIENT
40%
47%
12%
25%
_%
20%
_%
41%
60%
45%
33%
40%
33%
52%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
43
23%
20
14%
23
56%
5
42%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
36
22%
1
20%
22
22%
21
24%
43
23%
35
28%
8
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
71
38%
58
39%
13
32%
4
33%
_
_
3
60%
_
_
63
38%
1
20%
34
33%
37
43%
71
38%
48
39%
23
35%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
60
32%
55
37%
5
12%
3
25%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
54
32%
2
40%
35
34%
25
29%
60
32%
33
27%
27
42%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
15
8%
15
10%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
14
8%
1
20%
11
11%
4
5%
15
8%
8
6%
7
11%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
45
28%
LEVEL 2
58
36%
LEVEL 3
38
23%
LEVEL 4
21
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
21
16%
LEVEL 2
54
41%
LEVEL 3
37
28%
LEVEL 4
19
15%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
24
77%
LEVEL 2
4
13%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 147
LEVEL 1
41
28%
LEVEL 2
53
36%
LEVEL 3
34
23%
LEVEL 4
19
13%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
4
27%
LEVEL 2
5
33%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
22
25%
LEVEL 2
25
28%
LEVEL 3
24
27%
LEVEL 4
17
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
23
31%
LEVEL 2
33
45%
LEVEL 3
14
19%
LEVEL 4
4
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
45
28%
LEVEL 2
58
36%
LEVEL 3
38
23%
LEVEL 4
21
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
37
38%
LEVEL 2
36
37%
LEVEL 3
20
20%
LEVEL 4
5
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
8
13%
LEVEL 2
22
34%
LEVEL 3
18
28%
LEVEL 4
16
25%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
45
28%
LEVEL 2
58
36%
LEVEL 3
38
23%
LEVEL 4
21
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
162
131
31
11
3
1
147
15
88
74
162
98
64
162
PROFICIENT
36%
43%
10%
_%
_%
_%
36%
40%
47%
24%
36%
26%
53%
36%
LEVEL 1
45
28%
21
16%
24
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
41
28%
4
27%
22
25%
23
31%
45
28%
37
38%
8
13%
45
28%
LEVEL 2
58
36%
54
41%
4
13%
_
_
_
_
_
_
53
36%
5
33%
25
28%
33
45%
58
36%
36
37%
22
34%
58
36%
LEVEL 3
38
23%
37
28%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
23%
4
27%
24
27%
14
19%
38
23%
20
20%
18
28%
38
23%
LEVEL 4
21
13%
19
15%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
13%
2
13%
17
19%
4
5%
21
13%
5
5%
16
25%
21
13%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 154
LEVEL 1
73
47%
LEVEL 2
46
30%
LEVEL 3
25
16%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 120
LEVEL 1
43
36%
LEVEL 2
42
35%
LEVEL 3
25
21%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
30
88%
LEVEL 2
4
12%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 145
LEVEL 1
69
48%
LEVEL 2
44
30%
LEVEL 3
23
16%
LEVEL 4
9
6%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
29
40%
LEVEL 2
24
33%
LEVEL 3
16
22%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
44
54%
LEVEL 2
22
27%
LEVEL 3
9
11%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 154
LEVEL 1
73
47%
LEVEL 2
46
30%
LEVEL 3
25
16%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
58
59%
LEVEL 2
26
27%
LEVEL 3
11
11%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
15
27%
LEVEL 2
20
36%
LEVEL 3
14
25%
LEVEL 4
7
13%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 153
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
154
120
34
3
1
3
2
145
9
72
82
154
98
56
1
153
PROFICIENT
23%
29%
0%
_%
_%
_%
_%
22%
33%
26%
20%
23%
14%
38%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
73
47%
43
36%
30
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
69
48%
4
44%
29
40%
44
54%
73
47%
58
59%
15
27%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
46
30%
42
35%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
30%
2
22%
24
33%
22
27%
46
30%
26
27%
20
36%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
25
16%
25
21%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
16%
2
22%
16
22%
9
11%
25
16%
11
11%
14
25%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
10
6%
10
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
6%
1
11%
3
4%
7
9%
10
6%
3
3%
7
13%
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
38
23%
LEVEL 2
78
47%
LEVEL 3
31
19%
LEVEL 4
18
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 147
LEVEL 1
23
16%
LEVEL 2
75
51%
LEVEL 3
31
21%
LEVEL 4
18
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
15
83%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
8
73%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
34
24%
LEVEL 2
63
44%
LEVEL 3
28
20%
LEVEL 4
17
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 83
LEVEL 1
14
17%
LEVEL 2
38
46%
LEVEL 3
18
22%
LEVEL 4
13
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
24
29%
LEVEL 2
40
49%
LEVEL 3
13
16%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
38
23%
LEVEL 2
78
47%
LEVEL 3
31
19%
LEVEL 4
18
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
31
32%
LEVEL 2
46
48%
LEVEL 3
17
18%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
7
10%
LEVEL 2
32
46%
LEVEL 3
14
20%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 163
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
165
147
18
11
2
5
4
142
1
7
83
82
165
96
69
2
163
PROFICIENT
30%
33%
0%
9%
_%
20%
_%
32%
_%
29%
37%
22%
30%
20%
43%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
38
23%
23
16%
15
83%
2
18%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
34
24%
_
_
1
14%
14
17%
24
29%
38
23%
31
32%
7
10%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
78
47%
75
51%
3
17%
8
73%
_
_
3
60%
_
_
63
44%
_
_
4
57%
38
46%
40
49%
78
47%
46
48%
32
46%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
31
19%
31
21%
0
0%
1
9%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
28
20%
_
_
1
14%
18
22%
13
16%
31
19%
17
18%
14
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
18
11%
18
12%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
17
12%
_
_
1
14%
13
16%
5
6%
18
11%
2
2%
16
23%
_
_
_
_
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 290
All Students
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
60
38%
LEVEL 2
70
44%
LEVEL 3
25
16%
LEVEL 4
5
3%
General Education
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
39
29%
LEVEL 2
66
49%
LEVEL 3
25
19%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
21
84%
LEVEL 2
4
16%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
53
39%
LEVEL 2
58
42%
LEVEL 3
21
15%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
26
35%
LEVEL 2
28
37%
LEVEL 3
18
24%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
34
40%
LEVEL 2
42
49%
LEVEL 3
7
8%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
60
38%
LEVEL 2
70
44%
LEVEL 3
25
16%
LEVEL 4
5
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
42
47%
LEVEL 2
36
40%
LEVEL 3
9
10%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
18
26%
LEVEL 2
34
49%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
60
38%
LEVEL 2
70
44%
LEVEL 3
25
16%
LEVEL 4
5
3%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
160
135
25
14
3
3
3
137
9
75
85
160
90
70
160
PROFICIENT
19%
22%
0%
21%
_%
_%
_%
19%
11%
28%
11%
19%
13%
26%
19%
LEVEL 1
60
38%
39
29%
21
84%
5
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
53
39%
2
22%
26
35%
34
40%
60
38%
42
47%
18
26%
60
38%
LEVEL 2
70
44%
66
49%
4
16%
6
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
58
42%
6
67%
28
37%
42
49%
70
44%
36
40%
34
49%
70
44%
LEVEL 3
25
16%
25
19%
0
0%
3
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
15%
1
11%
18
24%
7
8%
25
16%
9
10%
16
23%
25
16%
LEVEL 4
5
3%
5
4%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
4%
0
0%
3
4%
2
2%
5
3%
3
3%
2
3%
5
3%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
50
34%
LEVEL 2
65
44%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
31
25%
LEVEL 2
62
50%
LEVEL 3
21
17%
LEVEL 4
11
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
19
79%
LEVEL 2
3
13%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
8
50%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
41
32%
LEVEL 2
57
45%
LEVEL 3
19
15%
LEVEL 4
11
9%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
18
24%
LEVEL 2
36
48%
LEVEL 3
15
20%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
32
43%
LEVEL 2
29
39%
LEVEL 3
8
11%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
50
34%
LEVEL 2
65
44%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
34
42%
LEVEL 2
33
41%
LEVEL 3
12
15%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
16
24%
LEVEL 2
32
47%
LEVEL 3
11
16%
LEVEL 4
9
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149
LEVEL 1
50
34%
LEVEL 2
65
44%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
149
125
24
16
3
2
128
5
75
74
149
81
68
149
PROFICIENT
23%
26%
8%
19%
_%
_%
23%
20%
28%
18%
23%
17%
29%
23%
LEVEL 1
50
34%
31
25%
19
79%
8
50%
_
_
_
_
41
32%
1
20%
18
24%
32
43%
50
34%
34
42%
16
24%
50
34%
LEVEL 2
65
44%
62
50%
3
13%
5
31%
_
_
_
_
57
45%
3
60%
36
48%
29
39%
65
44%
33
41%
32
47%
65
44%
LEVEL 3
23
15%
21
17%
2
8%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
19
15%
1
20%
15
20%
8
11%
23
15%
12
15%
11
16%
23
15%
LEVEL 4
11
7%
11
9%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
11
9%
0
0%
6
8%
5
7%
11
7%
2
2%
9
13%
11
7%
Grade 3 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 309
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
41
22%
LEVEL 2
51
27%
LEVEL 3
52
27%
LEVEL 4
46
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 147
LEVEL 1
22
15%
LEVEL 2
37
25%
LEVEL 3
46
31%
LEVEL 4
42
29%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43
LEVEL 1
19
44%
LEVEL 2
14
33%
LEVEL 3
6
14%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 168
LEVEL 1
35
21%
LEVEL 2
44
26%
LEVEL 3
45
27%
LEVEL 4
44
26%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
23
23%
LEVEL 2
30
29%
LEVEL 3
26
25%
LEVEL 4
23
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
18
20%
LEVEL 2
21
24%
LEVEL 3
26
30%
LEVEL 4
23
26%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
41
22%
LEVEL 2
51
27%
LEVEL 3
52
27%
LEVEL 4
46
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
34
27%
LEVEL 2
34
27%
LEVEL 3
30
24%
LEVEL 4
26
21%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
17
26%
LEVEL 3
22
33%
LEVEL 4
20
30%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 189
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
190
147
43
12
1
5
4
168
5
102
88
190
124
66
1
189
PROFICIENT
52%
60%
23%
42%
_%
40%
_%
53%
40%
48%
56%
52%
45%
64%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
41
22%
22
15%
19
44%
3
25%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
35
21%
2
40%
23
23%
18
20%
41
22%
34
27%
7
11%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
51
27%
37
25%
14
33%
4
33%
_
_
2
40%
_
_
44
26%
1
20%
30
29%
21
24%
51
27%
34
27%
17
26%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
52
27%
46
31%
6
14%
5
42%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
45
27%
1
20%
26
25%
26
30%
52
27%
30
24%
22
33%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
46
24%
42
29%
4
9%
0
0%
_
_
1
20%
_
_
44
26%
1
20%
23
23%
23
26%
46
24%
26
21%
20
30%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 300
All Students
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
45
28%
LEVEL 2
48
30%
LEVEL 3
51
32%
LEVEL 4
16
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
24
19%
LEVEL 2
40
31%
LEVEL 3
50
39%
LEVEL 4
15
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
21
68%
LEVEL 2
8
26%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
39
27%
LEVEL 2
42
30%
LEVEL 3
46
32%
LEVEL 4
15
11%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 85
LEVEL 1
25
29%
LEVEL 2
23
27%
LEVEL 3
27
32%
LEVEL 4
10
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 75
LEVEL 1
20
27%
LEVEL 2
25
33%
LEVEL 3
24
32%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
45
28%
LEVEL 2
48
30%
LEVEL 3
51
32%
LEVEL 4
16
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 94
LEVEL 1
36
38%
LEVEL 2
29
31%
LEVEL 3
25
27%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
9
14%
LEVEL 2
19
29%
LEVEL 3
26
39%
LEVEL 4
12
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
45
28%
LEVEL 2
48
30%
LEVEL 3
51
32%
LEVEL 4
16
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
160
129
31
12
1
4
1
142
6
85
75
160
94
66
160
PROFICIENT
42%
50%
6%
33%
_%
_%
_%
43%
33%
44%
40%
42%
31%
58%
42%
LEVEL 1
45
28%
24
19%
21
68%
4
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
27%
2
33%
25
29%
20
27%
45
28%
36
38%
9
14%
45
28%
LEVEL 2
48
30%
40
31%
8
26%
4
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
30%
2
33%
23
27%
25
33%
48
30%
29
31%
19
29%
48
30%
LEVEL 3
51
32%
50
39%
1
3%
3
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
32%
2
33%
27
32%
24
32%
51
32%
25
27%
26
39%
51
32%
LEVEL 4
16
10%
15
12%
1
3%
1
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
11%
0
0%
10
12%
6
8%
16
10%
4
4%
12
18%
16
10%
Grade 5 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 294
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
65
43%
LEVEL 2
47
31%
LEVEL 3
32
21%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
38
32%
LEVEL 2
42
36%
LEVEL 3
30
26%
LEVEL 4
7
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
27
79%
LEVEL 2
5
15%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 142
LEVEL 1
60
42%
LEVEL 2
45
32%
LEVEL 3
30
21%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
32
46%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
12
17%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 82
LEVEL 1
33
40%
LEVEL 2
24
29%
LEVEL 3
20
24%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
65
43%
LEVEL 2
47
31%
LEVEL 3
32
21%
LEVEL 4
7
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
49
51%
LEVEL 2
28
29%
LEVEL 3
16
17%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
16
29%
LEVEL 2
19
35%
LEVEL 3
16
29%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 150
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
151
117
34
3
1
3
2
142
9
69
82
151
96
55
1
150
PROFICIENT
26%
32%
6%
_%
_%
_%
_%
26%
22%
20%
30%
26%
20%
36%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
65
43%
38
32%
27
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
60
42%
5
56%
32
46%
33
40%
65
43%
49
51%
16
29%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
47
31%
42
36%
5
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
32%
2
22%
23
33%
24
29%
47
31%
28
29%
19
35%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
32
21%
30
26%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
21%
2
22%
12
17%
20
24%
32
21%
16
17%
16
29%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
7
5%
7
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
5%
0
0%
2
3%
5
6%
7
5%
3
3%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
Grade 6 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 298
All Students
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
43
27%
LEVEL 2
76
47%
LEVEL 3
26
16%
LEVEL 4
17
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
26
18%
LEVEL 2
75
52%
LEVEL 3
26
18%
LEVEL 4
17
12%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
17
94%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
2
20%
LEVEL 2
7
70%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
37
27%
LEVEL 2
62
45%
LEVEL 3
24
17%
LEVEL 4
16
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
16
20%
LEVEL 2
42
52%
LEVEL 3
16
20%
LEVEL 4
7
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
27
33%
LEVEL 2
34
42%
LEVEL 3
10
12%
LEVEL 4
10
12%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 162
LEVEL 1
43
27%
LEVEL 2
76
47%
LEVEL 3
26
16%
LEVEL 4
17
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 96
LEVEL 1
30
31%
LEVEL 2
46
48%
LEVEL 3
16
17%
LEVEL 4
4
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
13
20%
LEVEL 2
30
45%
LEVEL 3
10
15%
LEVEL 4
13
20%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 160
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
162
144
18
10
2
6
4
139
1
7
81
81
162
96
66
2
160
PROFICIENT
27%
30%
0%
10%
_%
0%
_%
29%
_%
29%
28%
25%
27%
21%
35%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
43
27%
26
18%
17
94%
2
20%
_
_
2
33%
_
_
37
27%
_
_
2
29%
16
20%
27
33%
43
27%
30
31%
13
20%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
76
47%
75
52%
1
6%
7
70%
_
_
4
67%
_
_
62
45%
_
_
3
43%
42
52%
34
42%
76
47%
46
48%
30
45%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
26
16%
26
18%
0
0%
1
10%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
24
17%
_
_
1
14%
16
20%
10
12%
26
16%
16
17%
10
15%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
17
10%
17
12%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
16
12%
_
_
1
14%
7
9%
10
12%
17
10%
4
4%
13
20%
_
_
_
_
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 293
All Students
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
57
40%
LEVEL 2
60
43%
LEVEL 3
21
15%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
40
33%
LEVEL 2
57
47%
LEVEL 3
21
17%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
17
85%
LEVEL 2
3
15%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
8
62%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 122
LEVEL 1
51
42%
LEVEL 2
49
40%
LEVEL 3
19
16%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
25
36%
LEVEL 2
32
46%
LEVEL 3
10
14%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
32
44%
LEVEL 2
28
39%
LEVEL 3
11
15%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
57
40%
LEVEL 2
60
43%
LEVEL 3
21
15%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
35
49%
LEVEL 2
28
39%
LEVEL 3
7
10%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
22
31%
LEVEL 2
32
46%
LEVEL 3
14
20%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
57
40%
LEVEL 2
60
43%
LEVEL 3
21
15%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
141
121
20
13
2
3
1
122
6
69
72
141
71
70
141
PROFICIENT
17%
20%
0%
15%
_%
_%
_%
18%
0%
17%
17%
17%
11%
23%
17%
LEVEL 1
57
40%
40
33%
17
85%
3
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
51
42%
3
50%
25
36%
32
44%
57
40%
35
49%
22
31%
57
40%
LEVEL 2
60
43%
57
47%
3
15%
8
62%
_
_
_
_
_
_
49
40%
3
50%
32
46%
28
39%
60
43%
28
39%
32
46%
60
43%
LEVEL 3
21
15%
21
17%
0
0%
2
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
19
16%
0
0%
10
14%
11
15%
21
15%
7
10%
14
20%
21
15%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
3
2%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
2%
0
0%
2
3%
1
1%
3
2%
1
1%
2
3%
3
2%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 284
All Students
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
50
43%
LEVEL 2
53
46%
LEVEL 3
12
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 98
LEVEL 1
35
36%
LEVEL 2
51
52%
LEVEL 3
12
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
15
88%
LEVEL 2
2
12%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 95
LEVEL 1
40
42%
LEVEL 2
43
45%
LEVEL 3
12
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
10
50%
LEVEL 2
10
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
24
40%
LEVEL 2
29
48%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
26
47%
LEVEL 2
24
44%
LEVEL 3
5
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
50
43%
LEVEL 2
53
46%
LEVEL 3
12
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
34
49%
LEVEL 2
31
44%
LEVEL 3
5
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45
LEVEL 1
16
36%
LEVEL 2
22
49%
LEVEL 3
7
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
50
43%
LEVEL 2
53
46%
LEVEL 3
12
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
115
98
17
16
3
1
95
20
60
55
115
70
45
115
PROFICIENT
10%
12%
0%
_%
_%
_%
13%
0%
12%
9%
10%
7%
16%
10%
LEVEL 1
50
43%
35
36%
15
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
42%
10
50%
24
40%
26
47%
50
43%
34
49%
16
36%
50
43%
LEVEL 2
53
46%
51
52%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
43
45%
10
50%
29
48%
24
44%
53
46%
31
44%
22
49%
53
46%
LEVEL 3
12
10%
12
12%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
13%
0
0%
7
12%
5
9%
12
10%
5
7%
7
16%
12
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
23
92%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
25
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
4 & ABOVE
23
92%
3 & ABOVE
25
100%
Grade 4 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 85
All Students
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
5%
LEVEL 3
54
32%
LEVEL 4
104
62%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 137
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
35
26%
LEVEL 4
93
68%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
19
59%
LEVEL 4
11
34%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
7
54%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 150
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
6%
LEVEL 3
45
30%
LEVEL 4
94
63%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
3
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 88
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
6%
LEVEL 3
27
31%
LEVEL 4
56
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 81
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
27
33%
LEVEL 4
48
59%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
5%
LEVEL 3
54
32%
LEVEL 4
104
62%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 102
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
34
33%
LEVEL 4
59
58%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
20
30%
LEVEL 4
45
67%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
5%
LEVEL 3
54
32%
LEVEL 4
104
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
169
137
32
13
1
4
1
150
6
88
81
169
102
67
169
PROFICIENT
93%
93%
94%
100%
_%
_%
_%
93%
100%
94%
93%
93%
91%
97%
93%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
1%
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
1
1%
1
1%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
5%
7
5%
2
6%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
6%
0
0%
5
6%
4
5%
9
5%
8
8%
1
1%
9
5%
LEVEL 3
54
32%
35
26%
19
59%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
45
30%
3
50%
27
31%
27
33%
54
32%
34
33%
20
30%
54
32%
LEVEL 4
104
62%
93
68%
11
34%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
94
63%
3
50%
56
64%
48
59%
104
62%
59
58%
45
67%
104
62%
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 68
All Students
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 150
LEVEL 1
9
6%
LEVEL 2
42
28%
LEVEL 3
87
58%
LEVEL 4
12
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
28
22%
LEVEL 3
81
65%
LEVEL 4
11
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
14
56%
LEVEL 3
6
24%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
7
6%
LEVEL 2
34
27%
LEVEL 3
74
59%
LEVEL 4
10
8%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
13
52%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
18
25%
LEVEL 3
48
67%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
24
31%
LEVEL 3
39
50%
LEVEL 4
10
13%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 150
LEVEL 1
9
6%
LEVEL 2
42
28%
LEVEL 3
87
58%
LEVEL 4
12
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 87
LEVEL 1
8
9%
LEVEL 2
29
33%
LEVEL 3
45
52%
LEVEL 4
5
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
13
21%
LEVEL 3
42
67%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 150
LEVEL 1
9
6%
LEVEL 2
42
28%
LEVEL 3
87
58%
LEVEL 4
12
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
150
125
25
21
3
1
125
25
72
78
150
87
63
150
PROFICIENT
66%
74%
28%
_%
_%
_%
67%
60%
69%
63%
66%
57%
78%
66%
LEVEL 1
9
6%
5
4%
4
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
6%
2
8%
4
6%
5
6%
9
6%
8
9%
1
2%
9
6%
LEVEL 2
42
28%
28
22%
14
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
34
27%
8
32%
18
25%
24
31%
42
28%
29
33%
13
21%
42
28%
LEVEL 3
87
58%
81
65%
6
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
74
59%
13
52%
48
67%
39
50%
87
58%
45
52%
42
67%
87
58%
LEVEL 4
12
8%
11
9%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
8%
2
8%
2
3%
10
13%
12
8%
5
6%
7
11%
12
8%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
23
92%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
25
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
23
92%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
General Education
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
74
41%
LEVEL 4
93
51%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
7
18%
LEVEL 3
12
32%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
16
40%
LEVEL 4
14
35%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
8
5%
LEVEL 3
66
39%
LEVEL 4
74
44%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
47
41%
LEVEL 4
54
47%
Male
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
39
37%
LEVEL 4
41
39%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
54
46%
LEVEL 4
31
26%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
32
31%
LEVEL 4
64
62%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
82%
92%
37%
75%
_%
_%
83%
100%
89%
75%
82%
73%
93%
82%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
2
2%
0
0%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
2
1%
7
18%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
8
5%
0
0%
3
3%
6
6%
9
4%
7
6%
2
2%
9
4%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
74
41%
12
32%
16
40%
_
_
_
_
66
39%
4
36%
47
41%
39
37%
86
39%
54
46%
32
31%
86
39%
LEVEL 4
95
43%
93
51%
2
5%
14
35%
_
_
_
_
74
44%
7
64%
54
47%
41
39%
95
43%
31
26%
64
62%
95
43%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
3
2%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
130
71%
LEVEL 4
40
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
16
42%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
28
70%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
7
4%
LEVEL 3
110
65%
LEVEL 4
37
22%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
73%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
80
70%
LEVEL 4
24
21%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
66
62%
LEVEL 4
18
17%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
8
7%
LEVEL 3
80
68%
LEVEL 4
10
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
66
64%
LEVEL 4
32
31%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
85%
93%
47%
78%
_%
_%
87%
91%
91%
79%
85%
77%
95%
85%
LEVEL 1
5
2%
3
2%
2
5%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
2
1%
1
9%
2
2%
3
3%
5
2%
5
4%
0
0%
5
2%
LEVEL 2
9
4%
3
2%
6
16%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
7
4%
0
0%
4
4%
5
5%
9
4%
8
7%
1
1%
9
4%
LEVEL 3
146
66%
130
71%
16
42%
28
70%
_
_
_
_
110
65%
8
73%
80
70%
66
62%
146
66%
80
68%
66
64%
146
66%
LEVEL 4
42
19%
40
22%
2
5%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
37
22%
2
18%
24
21%
18
17%
42
19%
10
9%
32
31%
42
19%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
General Education
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
7
4%
LEVEL 3
90
49%
LEVEL 4
67
37%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
8
21%
LEVEL 3
13
34%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
17
43%
LEVEL 4
12
30%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
8
5%
LEVEL 2
11
7%
LEVEL 3
82
49%
LEVEL 4
52
31%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
Female
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
61
54%
LEVEL 4
32
28%
Male
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
8
8%
LEVEL 3
42
40%
LEVEL 4
36
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
7
6%
LEVEL 2
12
10%
LEVEL 3
56
48%
LEVEL 4
21
18%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
47
46%
LEVEL 4
47
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
78%
86%
37%
73%
_%
_%
79%
73%
82%
74%
78%
66%
91%
78%
LEVEL 1
9
4%
6
3%
3
8%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
8
5%
0
0%
6
5%
3
3%
9
4%
7
6%
2
2%
9
4%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
7
4%
8
21%
3
8%
_
_
_
_
11
7%
1
9%
7
6%
8
8%
15
7%
12
10%
3
3%
15
7%
LEVEL 3
103
47%
90
49%
13
34%
17
43%
_
_
_
_
82
49%
4
36%
61
54%
42
40%
103
47%
56
48%
47
46%
103
47%
LEVEL 4
68
31%
67
37%
1
3%
12
30%
_
_
_
_
52
31%
4
36%
32
28%
36
34%
68
31%
21
18%
47
46%
68
31%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
General Education
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
60
33%
LEVEL 4
105
58%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
8%
LEVEL 3
13
34%
LEVEL 4
6
16%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
38%
LEVEL 4
16
40%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
2%
LEVEL 3
55
33%
LEVEL 4
88
52%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
3%
LEVEL 3
43
38%
LEVEL 4
55
48%
Male
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
30
28%
LEVEL 4
56
53%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
4
3%
LEVEL 3
45
38%
LEVEL 4
43
37%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
28
27%
LEVEL 4
68
66%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
84%
91%
50%
78%
_%
_%
85%
91%
86%
81%
84%
75%
93%
84%
LEVEL 1
1
0%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
1
0%
1
1%
0
0%
1
0%
LEVEL 2
5
2%
2
1%
3
8%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
2%
1
9%
3
3%
2
2%
5
2%
4
3%
1
1%
5
2%
LEVEL 3
73
33%
60
33%
13
34%
15
38%
_
_
_
_
55
33%
3
27%
43
38%
30
28%
73
33%
45
38%
28
27%
73
33%
LEVEL 4
111
50%
105
58%
6
16%
16
40%
_
_
_
_
88
52%
7
64%
55
48%
56
53%
111
50%
43
37%
68
66%
111
50%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
General Education
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 182
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
2%
LEVEL 3
101
55%
LEVEL 4
68
37%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
9
24%
LEVEL 3
15
39%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
5%
LEVEL 3
20
50%
LEVEL 4
11
28%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 169
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
10
6%
LEVEL 3
92
54%
LEVEL 4
54
32%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 114
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
68
60%
LEVEL 4
34
30%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 106
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
5
5%
LEVEL 3
48
45%
LEVEL 4
36
34%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
2
2%
LEVEL 2
10
9%
LEVEL 3
66
56%
LEVEL 4
23
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 103
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
50
49%
LEVEL 4
47
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 220
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
182
38
40
4
7
169
11
114
106
220
117
103
220
PROFICIENT
85%
93%
45%
78%
_%
_%
86%
82%
89%
79%
85%
76%
94%
85%
LEVEL 1
2
1%
0
0%
2
5%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
2
2%
0
0%
2
1%
LEVEL 2
12
5%
3
2%
9
24%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
10
6%
0
0%
7
6%
5
5%
12
5%
10
9%
2
2%
12
5%
LEVEL 3
116
53%
101
55%
15
39%
20
50%
_
_
_
_
92
54%
4
36%
68
60%
48
45%
116
53%
66
56%
50
49%
116
53%
LEVEL 4
70
32%
68
37%
2
5%
11
28%
_
_
_
_
54
32%
5
45%
34
30%
36
34%
70
32%
23
20%
47
46%
70
32%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
8
3
5
8
2
6
8
6
2
8
55
5
63%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
_
_
_
_
5
63%
65
1
13%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
_
_
_
_
1
13%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
63%
65
1
13%
85
0
0%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
187
159
28
27
1
5
3
151
9
96
91
187
83
104
187
LEVEL 1
6
3%
2
1%
4
14%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
3%
1
11%
0
0%
6
7%
6
3%
5
6%
1
1%
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
1
1%
7
25%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
5%
0
0%
6
6%
2
2%
8
4%
6
7%
2
2%
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
27
17%
9
32%
5
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
19%
2
22%
13
14%
23
25%
36
19%
21
25%
15
14%
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
31
19%
6
21%
7
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
20%
0
0%
17
18%
20
22%
37
20%
12
14%
25
24%
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
98
62%
2
7%
15
56%
_
_
_
_
_
_
79
52%
6
67%
60
63%
40
44%
100
53%
39
47%
61
59%
100
53%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 187
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 159
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
1%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
27
17%
LEVEL 4
31
19%
LEVEL 5
98
62%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
14%
LEVEL 2
7
25%
LEVEL 3
9
32%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
19%
LEVEL 4
7
26%
LEVEL 5
15
56%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 151
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
3%
LEVEL 2
8
5%
LEVEL 3
29
19%
LEVEL 4
30
20%
LEVEL 5
79
52%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
6
67%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
6%
LEVEL 3
13
14%
LEVEL 4
17
18%
LEVEL 5
60
63%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 91
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
7%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
23
25%
LEVEL 4
20
22%
LEVEL 5
40
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 187
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 83
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
21
25%
LEVEL 4
12
14%
LEVEL 5
39
47%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 104
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
14%
LEVEL 4
25
24%
LEVEL 5
61
59%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 187
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
3%
LEVEL 2
8
4%
LEVEL 3
36
19%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
LEVEL 5
100
53%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
20
1
7
14
12
9
21
7
14
21
55
19
90%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
12
86%
11
92%
8
89%
19
90%
5
71%
14
100%
19
90%
65
11
52%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
9
64%
8
67%
3
33%
11
52%
3
43%
8
57%
11
52%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
11
52%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
2
29%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
86%
65
9
64%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
8
67%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
3
33%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
11
52%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
3
43%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
8
57%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
90%
65
11
52%
85
0
0%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
89
88
1
15
1
2
1
70
19
54
35
89
26
63
89
55
70
79%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
56
80%
14
74%
43
80%
27
77%
70
79%
22
85%
48
76%
70
79%
65
52
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
66%
6
32%
30
56%
22
63%
52
58%
15
58%
37
59%
52
58%
85
10
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
11%
2
11%
6
11%
4
11%
10
11%
2
8%
8
13%
10
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
79%
65
52
58%
85
10
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 88
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
80%
65
46
66%
85
8
11%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
74%
65
6
32%
85
2
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 54
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
43
80%
65
30
56%
85
6
11%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
77%
65
22
63%
85
4
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
79%
65
52
58%
85
10
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
85%
65
15
58%
85
2
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
48
76%
65
37
59%
85
8
13%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 89
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
70
79%
65
52
58%
85
10
11%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
220
196
24
30
1
3
5
181
9
120
100
220
106
114
1
219
LEVEL 1
16
7%
8
4%
8
33%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
7%
1
11%
8
7%
8
8%
16
7%
10
9%
6
5%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
40
18%
31
16%
9
38%
8
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
17%
2
22%
23
19%
17
17%
40
18%
21
20%
19
17%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
84
38%
77
39%
7
29%
9
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
73
40%
2
22%
40
33%
44
44%
84
38%
45
42%
39
34%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
46
21%
46
23%
0
0%
7
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
20%
2
22%
30
25%
16
16%
46
21%
22
21%
24
21%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
34
15%
34
17%
0
0%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
16%
2
22%
19
16%
15
15%
34
15%
8
8%
26
23%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 220
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
7%
LEVEL 2
40
18%
LEVEL 3
84
38%
LEVEL 4
46
21%
LEVEL 5
34
15%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 196
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
4%
LEVEL 2
31
16%
LEVEL 3
77
39%
LEVEL 4
46
23%
LEVEL 5
34
17%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
33%
LEVEL 2
9
38%
LEVEL 3
7
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
8
27%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
7
23%
LEVEL 5
3
10%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
7%
LEVEL 2
30
17%
LEVEL 3
73
40%
LEVEL 4
37
20%
LEVEL 5
29
16%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
LEVEL 5
2
22%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 120
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
23
19%
LEVEL 3
40
33%
LEVEL 4
30
25%
LEVEL 5
19
16%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
8%
LEVEL 2
17
17%
LEVEL 3
44
44%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
LEVEL 5
15
15%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 220
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
7%
LEVEL 2
40
18%
LEVEL 3
84
38%
LEVEL 4
46
21%
LEVEL 5
34
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 106
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
9%
LEVEL 2
21
20%
LEVEL 3
45
42%
LEVEL 4
22
21%
LEVEL 5
8
8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 114
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
19
17%
LEVEL 3
39
34%
LEVEL 4
24
21%
LEVEL 5
26
23%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 219
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
100
95
5
14
2
4
80
6
56
44
100
28
72
100
LEVEL 1
9
9%
8
8%
1
20%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
9
11%
0
0%
4
7%
5
11%
9
9%
4
14%
5
7%
9
9%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
16
17%
0
0%
6
43%
_
_
_
_
9
11%
1
17%
9
16%
7
16%
16
16%
4
14%
12
17%
16
16%
LEVEL 3
50
50%
46
48%
4
80%
7
50%
_
_
_
_
38
48%
5
83%
29
52%
21
48%
50
50%
15
54%
35
49%
50
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
13
14%
0
0%
1
7%
_
_
_
_
12
15%
0
0%
9
16%
4
9%
13
13%
3
11%
10
14%
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
12
13%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
12
15%
0
0%
5
9%
7
16%
12
12%
2
7%
10
14%
12
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
9%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
LEVEL 3
50
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 95
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
8%
LEVEL 2
16
17%
LEVEL 3
46
48%
LEVEL 4
13
14%
LEVEL 5
12
13%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
7
50%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 80
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
11%
LEVEL 2
9
11%
LEVEL 3
38
48%
LEVEL 4
12
15%
LEVEL 5
12
15%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
5
83%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 56
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
9
16%
LEVEL 3
29
52%
LEVEL 4
9
16%
LEVEL 5
5
9%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
11%
LEVEL 2
7
16%
LEVEL 3
21
48%
LEVEL 4
4
9%
LEVEL 5
7
16%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
9%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
LEVEL 3
50
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
14%
LEVEL 2
4
14%
LEVEL 3
15
54%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
LEVEL 5
2
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
7%
LEVEL 2
12
17%
LEVEL 3
35
49%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
LEVEL 5
10
14%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
9%
LEVEL 2
16
16%
LEVEL 3
50
50%
LEVEL 4
13
13%
LEVEL 5
12
12%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
66
12
1
2
1
50
16
40
26
66
21
45
66
LEVEL 1
4
6%
4
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
6%
1
6%
2
5%
2
8%
4
6%
1
5%
3
7%
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
7
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
12%
1
6%
6
15%
1
4%
7
11%
1
5%
6
13%
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
43
65%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
60%
13
81%
26
65%
17
65%
43
65%
16
76%
27
60%
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
10
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
18%
1
6%
5
13%
5
19%
10
15%
3
14%
7
16%
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
4%
0
0%
1
3%
1
4%
2
3%
0
0%
2
4%
2
3%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
6
12%
LEVEL 3
30
60%
LEVEL 4
9
18%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
13
81%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
6
15%
LEVEL 3
26
65%
LEVEL 4
5
13%
LEVEL 5
1
3%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
6
13%
LEVEL 3
27
60%
LEVEL 4
7
16%
LEVEL 5
2
4%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
7
11%
LEVEL 3
43
65%
LEVEL 4
10
15%
LEVEL 5
2
3%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
272
230
42
42
3
2
4
221
9
146
126
272
130
142
272
55
235
86%
206
90%
29
69%
35
83%
_
_
_
_
_
_
191
86%
9
100%
122
84%
113
90%
235
86%
107
82%
128
90%
235
86%
65
174
64%
161
70%
13
31%
25
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
141
64%
8
89%
87
60%
87
69%
174
64%
76
58%
98
69%
174
64%
85
55
20%
53
23%
2
5%
5
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
46
21%
4
44%
28
19%
27
21%
55
20%
18
14%
37
26%
55
20%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 272
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
235
86%
65
174
64%
85
55
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 230
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
206
90%
65
161
70%
85
53
23%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
69%
65
13
31%
85
2
5%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
83%
65
25
60%
85
5
12%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 221
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
191
86%
65
141
64%
85
46
21%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
4
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 146
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
84%
65
87
60%
85
28
19%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 126
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
113
90%
65
87
69%
85
27
21%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 272
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
235
86%
65
174
64%
85
55
20%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 130
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
107
82%
65
76
58%
85
18
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
128
90%
65
98
69%
85
37
26%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 272
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
235
86%
65
174
64%
85
55
20%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
181
159
22
30
1
4
4
142
9
96
85
181
79
102
181
55
176
97%
158
99%
18
82%
29
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
138
97%
9
100%
94
98%
82
96%
176
97%
74
94%
102
100%
176
97%
65
167
92%
152
96%
15
68%
27
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
132
93%
8
89%
90
94%
77
91%
167
92%
69
87%
98
96%
167
92%
85
100
55%
97
61%
3
14%
19
63%
_
_
_
_
_
_
76
54%
5
56%
53
55%
47
55%
100
55%
39
49%
61
60%
100
55%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
176
97%
65
167
92%
85
100
55%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 159
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
158
99%
65
152
96%
85
97
61%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
82%
65
15
68%
85
3
14%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
27
90%
85
19
63%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 142
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
138
97%
65
132
93%
85
76
54%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
5
56%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 96
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
94
98%
65
90
94%
85
53
55%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
82
96%
65
77
91%
85
47
55%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
176
97%
65
167
92%
85
100
55%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 79
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
74
94%
65
69
87%
85
39
49%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 102
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
102
100%
65
98
96%
85
61
60%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 181
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
176
97%
65
167
92%
85
100
55%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
208
186
22
33
2
2
4
167
8
110
98
208
97
111
208
55
202
97%
181
97%
21
95%
32
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
162
97%
8
100%
106
96%
96
98%
202
97%
91
94%
111
100%
202
97%
65
189
91%
172
92%
17
77%
27
82%
_
_
_
_
_
_
154
92%
8
100%
98
89%
91
93%
189
91%
85
88%
104
94%
189
91%
85
75
36%
75
40%
0
0%
11
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
59
35%
5
63%
39
35%
36
37%
75
36%
19
20%
56
50%
75
36%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 208
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
202
97%
65
189
91%
85
75
36%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 186
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
181
97%
65
172
92%
85
75
40%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
95%
65
17
77%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
97%
65
27
82%
85
11
33%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 167
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
162
97%
65
154
92%
85
59
35%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
5
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 110
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
106
96%
65
98
89%
85
39
35%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
96
98%
65
91
93%
85
36
37%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 208
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
202
97%
65
189
91%
85
75
36%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
91
94%
65
85
88%
85
19
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 111
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
111
100%
65
104
94%
85
56
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 208
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
202
97%
65
189
91%
85
75
36%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
152
144
8
18
2
4
128
6
84
68
152
58
94
152
55
145
95%
137
95%
8
100%
17
94%
_
_
_
_
122
95%
6
100%
78
93%
67
99%
145
95%
56
97%
89
95%
145
95%
65
122
80%
117
81%
5
63%
14
78%
_
_
_
_
102
80%
6
100%
64
76%
58
85%
122
80%
47
81%
75
80%
122
80%
85
53
35%
51
35%
2
25%
4
22%
_
_
_
_
46
36%
3
50%
24
29%
29
43%
53
35%
18
31%
35
37%
53
35%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
145
95%
65
122
80%
85
53
35%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 144
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
137
95%
65
117
81%
85
51
35%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
5
63%
85
2
25%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
14
78%
85
4
22%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 128
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
122
95%
65
102
80%
85
46
36%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
3
50%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 84
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
78
93%
65
64
76%
85
24
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
99%
65
58
85%
85
29
43%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
145
95%
65
122
80%
85
53
35%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
56
97%
65
47
81%
85
18
31%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 94
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
89
95%
65
75
80%
85
35
37%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 152
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
145
95%
65
122
80%
85
53
35%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
86
85
1
17
2
67
19
53
33
86
23
63
86
55
84
98%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
97%
19
100%
53
100%
31
94%
84
98%
23
100%
61
97%
84
98%
65
66
77%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
52
78%
14
74%
42
79%
24
73%
66
77%
17
74%
49
78%
66
77%
85
10
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
10%
3
16%
3
6%
7
21%
10
12%
2
9%
8
13%
10
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
98%
65
66
77%
85
10
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 85
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 67
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
97%
65
52
78%
85
7
10%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
100%
65
14
74%
85
3
16%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
100%
65
42
79%
85
3
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
94%
65
24
73%
85
7
21%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
98%
65
66
77%
85
10
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
100%
65
17
74%
85
2
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
61
97%
65
49
78%
85
8
13%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 86
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
84
98%
65
66
77%
85
10
12%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
52
52
4
1
2
1
44
8
27
25
52
17
35
52
55
52
100%
52
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
44
100%
8
100%
27
100%
25
100%
52
100%
17
100%
35
100%
52
100%
65
50
96%
50
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
95%
8
100%
25
93%
25
100%
50
96%
16
94%
34
97%
50
96%
85
19
37%
19
37%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
36%
3
38%
8
30%
11
44%
19
37%
5
29%
14
40%
19
37%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
100%
65
42
95%
85
16
36%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
3
38%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
25
93%
85
8
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
11
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
16
94%
85
5
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
100%
65
34
97%
85
14
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
52
100%
65
50
96%
85
19
37%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 Math
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 5 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,360*
195*
27
18
8
2,065*
1
401*
0
1,397*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
72%*
―
―
―
79%*
―
80%*
―
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
969
67
18
16
7
860
1
198✝
0
589
PI
98
84
―
―
―
98
―
39✝
―
82
EAMO
100
77
―
―
―
115
―
65
―
88
Safe Harbor Target
100
77
―
―
―
103
―
57
―
85
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,360*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
969
PI
98
EAMO
100
Safe Harbor Target
100
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
195*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
72%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
67
PI
84
EAMO
77
Safe Harbor Target
77
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
18
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,065*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
860
PI
98
EAMO
115
Safe Harbor Target
103
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
401*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
198✝
PI
39✝
EAMO
65
Safe Harbor Target
57
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,397*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
589
PI
82
EAMO
88
Safe Harbor Target
85
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,165*
2,314*
2,323*
2,344*
295*
2,359*
1,959*
2,360*
963*
1,157*
1,203*
4
2,353*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
78%*
78%*
78%*
74%*
78%*
78%*
78%*
76%*
80%*
76%*
―
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
902
951
953
962
109
968
790
969
380
476
493
4
965
PI
99
98
98
98
97
98
113
98
123
85
111
―
99
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,165*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
902
PI
99
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,314*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
951
PI
98
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,323*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
953
PI
98
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,344*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
962
PI
98
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
295*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
74%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
109
PI
97
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,359*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
968
PI
98
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,959*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
790
PI
113
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,360*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
969
PI
98
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
963*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
380
PI
123
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,157*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
476
PI
85
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,203*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
493
PI
111
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,353*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
965
PI
99
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
NO
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,362*
195*
27
18
9
2,068*
1
403*
0
1,395*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
59%*
―
―
―
71%*
―
68%*
―
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
930
65
19
14
6
825
1
185✝
0
556
PI
102
85
―
―
―
104
―
50✝
―
88
EAMO
97
77
―
―
―
111
―
66
―
86
Safe Harbor Target
97
77
―
―
―
111
―
66
―
86
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,362*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
930
PI
102
EAMO
97
Safe Harbor Target
97
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
195*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
59%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
65
PI
85
EAMO
77
Safe Harbor Target
77
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
18
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,068*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
825
PI
104
EAMO
111
Safe Harbor Target
111
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
403*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
185✝
PI
50✝
EAMO
66
Safe Harbor Target
66
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,395*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
556
PI
88
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
86
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,167*
2,317*
2,326*
2,345*
294*
2,361*
1,959*
2,362*
967*
1,157*
1,205*
4
2,355*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
70%*
70%*
70%*
64%*
70%*
70%*
70%*
70%*
72%*
68%*
―
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
865
911
916
924
105
929
763
930
374
457
473
4
926
PI
104
102
102
102
90
102
115
102
123
101
103
―
102
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,167*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
865
PI
104
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,317*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
911
PI
102
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,326*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
916
PI
102
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,345*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
924
PI
102
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
294*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
64%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
105
PI
90
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,361*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
929
PI
102
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,959*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
763
PI
115
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,362*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
930
PI
102
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
967*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
374
PI
123
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,157*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
72%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
457
PI
101
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,205*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
473
PI
103
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2,355*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
926
PI
102
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
407
39
10
3
1
354
0
75
0
238
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
―
―
―
―
85%
―
80%
―
83%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
336
33
6
3
0
294
0
68✝
0
194
PI
179
170
―
―
―
180
―
162✝
―
172
EAMO
181
166
―
―
―
188
―
159
―
172
Progress Target
181
1
―
―
―
188
―
159
―
172
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
336
PI
179
EAMO
181
Progress Target
181
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
170
EAMO
166
Progress Target
1
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
354
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
294
PI
180
EAMO
188
Progress Target
188
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
75
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68✝
PI
162✝
EAMO
159
Progress Target
159
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
238
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
194
PI
172
EAMO
172
Progress Target
172
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
368
397
404
406
53
407
332
407
169
204
203
0
407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
85%
85%
85%
87%
85%
86%
85%
88%
85%
85%
―
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
303
330
333
336
42
336
277
336
142
166
170
0
336
PI
181
179
179
179
176
179
184
179
190
177
182
―
179
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
368
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
303
PI
181
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
397
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
330
PI
179
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
404
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
333
PI
179
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
406
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
336
PI
179
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
53
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
42
PI
176
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
336
PI
179
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
332
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
277
PI
184
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
336
PI
179
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
169
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
142
PI
190
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
204
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
166
PI
177
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
170
PI
182
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
407
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
336
PI
179
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
205
35
6
7
0
157
0
26
0
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
99%
―
―
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
34
4
7
0
153
0
32✝
0
103
PI
157
153
―
―
―
157
―
63✝
―
135
EAMO
166
147
―
―
―
175
―
117
―
152
Safe Harbor Target
166
20
―
―
―
169
―
20
―
149
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
157
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
166
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
153
EAMO
147
Safe Harbor Target
20
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
157
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
153
PI
157
EAMO
175
Safe Harbor Target
169
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32✝
PI
63✝
EAMO
117
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
103
PI
135
EAMO
152
Safe Harbor Target
149
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
170
199
198
205
48
205
179
205
106
93
112
0
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
100%
99%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
164
194
191
198
45
198
166
198
95
94
104
0
198
PI
158
157
157
157
158
157
175
157
181
146
167
―
157
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
170
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
164
PI
158
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
199
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
194
PI
157
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
198
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
191
PI
157
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
157
Not White
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
158
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
157
General Education
12th Graders
179
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
166
PI
175
English Proficient
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
157
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
181
Male
12th Graders
93
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
146
Female
12th Graders
112
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
104
PI
167
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
157
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
205
35
6
7
0
157
0
26
0
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
―
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
34
4
7
0
153
0
32✝
0
103
PI
132
129
―
―
―
133
―
75✝
―
114
EAMO
151
129
―
―
―
162
―
108
―
136
Safe Harbor Target
144
20
―
―
―
146
―
20
―
124
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
132
EAMO
151
Safe Harbor Target
144
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
129
EAMO
129
Safe Harbor Target
20
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
6
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
157
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
153
PI
133
EAMO
162
Safe Harbor Target
146
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
26
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
32✝
PI
75✝
EAMO
108
Safe Harbor Target
20
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
103
PI
114
EAMO
136
Safe Harbor Target
124
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
170
199
198
205
48
205
179
205
106
93
112
0
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
164
194
191
198
45
198
166
198
95
94
104
0
198
PI
132
132
132
132
129
132
143
132
152
126
138
―
132
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
170
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
164
PI
132
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
199
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
194
PI
132
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
198
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
191
PI
132
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
132
Not White
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
45
PI
129
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
132
General Education
12th Graders
179
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
166
PI
143
English Proficient
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
132
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
106
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
152
Male
12th Graders
93
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
94
PI
126
Female
12th Graders
112
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
104
PI
138
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
205
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
198
PI
132
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
98
84
―
―
―
98
―
39
―
82
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
102
85
―
―
―
104
―
50
―
88
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
153
―
―
―
157
―
63
―
135
Secondary-Level MATH PI
132
129
―
―
―
133
―
75
―
114
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
122
113
0
0
0
123
0
57
0
105
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
98
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
102
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
Secondary-Level MATH PI
132
Unweighted Combined PI
122
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
84
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
85
Secondary-Level ELA PI
153
Secondary-Level MATH PI
129
Unweighted Combined PI
113
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
98
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
104
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
Secondary-Level MATH PI
133
Unweighted Combined PI
123
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
39
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
50
Secondary-Level ELA PI
63
Secondary-Level MATH PI
75
Unweighted Combined PI
57
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
82
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
88
Secondary-Level ELA PI
135
Secondary-Level MATH PI
114
Unweighted Combined PI
105
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
YES
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
NO
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
236
34
1
1
1
199
0
24
0
114
Graduation Rate
85%
79%
―
―
―
86%
―
―
―
72%
State Standard
80%
80%
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
80%
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
71%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
236
Graduation Rate
85%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
79%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
199
Graduation Rate
86%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
72%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
71%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
220
30
1
4
4
181
0
27
0
103
Graduation Rate
83%
87%
―
―
―
81%
―
―
―
75%
State Standard
80%
80%
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
78%
74%
―
―
―
79%
―
―
―
70%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
220
Graduation Rate
83%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
78%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
87%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
74%
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
181
Graduation Rate
81%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
79%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
103
Graduation Rate
75%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
70%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
202
235
235
235
37
236
212
236
122
112
124
0
236
Graduation Rate
86%
85%
85%
85%
81%
85%
89%
85%
98%
85%
85%
―
85%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
190
219
216
216
39
220
193
220
117
115
105
0
220
Graduation Rate
82%
83%
82%
82%
90%
83%
87%
83%
90%
83%
82%
―
83%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
202
Graduation Rate
86%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
235
Graduation Rate
85%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
81%
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
236
Graduation Rate
85%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
212
Graduation Rate
89%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
236
Graduation Rate
85%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
122
Graduation Rate
98%
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
112
Graduation Rate
85%
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
124
Graduation Rate
85%
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
236
Graduation Rate
85%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
190
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
219
Graduation Rate
83%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
216
Graduation Rate
82%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
216
Graduation Rate
82%
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
220
Graduation Rate
83%
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
193
Graduation Rate
87%
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
220
Graduation Rate
83%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
117
Graduation Rate
90%
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
115
Graduation Rate
83%
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
105
Graduation Rate
82%
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
220
Graduation Rate
83%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
30%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
30%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
2%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
