FOWLER HIGH SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
0%
Total Number of Classes
37
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 9
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
0%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
0%
Total Number of Classes
37
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
High School Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
147
113
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
113
24
REGENTS DIPLOMA
102
74%
98
87%
4
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
4%
6
5%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
35
26%
15
13%
20
83%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
10
7%
0
0%
10
29%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
147
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
Regents Diploma
102
74%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
2%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
35
26%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
10
7%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
113
Regents Diploma
98
87%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
5%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
15
13%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
24
Regents Diploma
4
17%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
20
83%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
10
29%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
147
113
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
113
24
REGENTS DIPLOMA
102
74%
98
87%
4
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
4%
6
5%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
35
26%
15
13%
20
83%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
10
7%
0
0%
10
29%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
147
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
Regents Diploma
102
74%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
2%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
35
26%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
10
7%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
113
Regents Diploma
98
87%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
5%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
15
13%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
24
Regents Diploma
4
17%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
20
83%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
10
29%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
147
113
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
113
24
REGENTS DIPLOMA
102
74%
98
87%
4
17%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
3
2%
3
3%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
6
4%
6
5%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
35
26%
15
13%
20
83%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
10
7%
0
0%
10
29%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
147
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
137
Regents Diploma
102
74%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
2%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
4%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
35
26%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
10
7%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
113
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
113
Regents Diploma
98
87%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
6
5%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
15
13%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
34
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
24
Regents Diploma
4
17%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
20
83%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
10
29%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
89
33%
69
36%
20
27%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
89
33%
69
36%
20
27%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
89
33%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
89
33%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
69
36%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
69
36%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
20
27%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
20
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
89
33%
69
36%
20
27%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
89
33%
69
36%
20
27%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
89
33%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
89
33%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
69
36%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
69
36%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
20
27%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
20
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
89
33%
69
36%
20
27%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
89
33%
69
36%
20
27%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
89
33%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
89
33%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
69
36%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
69
36%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
20
27%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
20
27%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
24
16%
24
21%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
88
60%
67
59%
21
62%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
1
1%
2
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
28
19%
20
18%
8
24%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
4
3%
1
1%
3
9%
All Students
To Four-Year College
24
16%
To Two-Year College
88
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
28
19%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
4
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
24
21%
To Two-Year College
67
59%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
20
18%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
21
62%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
6%
To Employment
8
24%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
24
16%
24
21%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
88
60%
67
59%
21
62%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
1
1%
2
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
28
19%
20
18%
8
24%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
4
3%
1
1%
3
9%
All Students
To Four-Year College
24
16%
To Two-Year College
88
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
28
19%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
4
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
24
21%
To Two-Year College
67
59%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
20
18%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
21
62%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
6%
To Employment
8
24%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
9%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
24
16%
24
21%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
88
60%
67
59%
21
62%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
3
2%
1
1%
2
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
28
19%
20
18%
8
24%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
4
3%
1
1%
3
9%
All Students
To Four-Year College
24
16%
To Two-Year College
88
60%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
3
2%
To Employment
28
19%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
4
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
24
21%
To Two-Year College
67
59%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
1%
To Employment
20
18%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
1%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
21
62%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
2
6%
To Employment
8
24%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
3
9%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2016 - 17)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
68%
*%
18%
48%
45%
22%
*%
74%
44%
BASIC
32%
22%
*%
30%
34%
33%
31%
*%
21%
33%
PROFICIENT
27%
9%
*%
33%
16%
18%
35%
*%
5%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
2%
*%
19%
3%
4%
13%
*%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
93
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
93
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
45
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
22
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
35
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
5
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
58%
*%
11%
36%
36%
14%
*%
68%
34%
BASIC
41%
31%
*%
30%
42%
44%
40%
*%
29%
43%
PROFICIENT
30%
10%
*%
44%
21%
18%
38%
*%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
1%
*%
15%
2%
2%
7%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
11
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
44
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
29
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
34
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
58%
*%
21%
39%
35%
20%
*%
81%
37%
BASIC
39%
33%
*%
31%
41%
43%
38%
*%
16%
41%
PROFICIENT
30%
8%
*%
37%
19%
21%
36%
*%
3%
20%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
*%
12%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
94
80
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
58
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
39
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
36
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
81
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
69%
*%
14%
53%
48%
21%
*%
80%
44%
BASIC
34%
23%
*%
24%
32%
33%
37%
*%
16%
34%
PROFICIENT
24%
6%
*%
32%
14%
15%
29%
*%
4%
17%
ADVANCED
10%
2%
*%
30%
2%
4%
13%
*%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
95
80
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
10
Participation Rate
98
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
69
Percent Basic
23
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
95
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
24
Percent Proficient
32
Percent Advanced
30
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
53
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
14
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
4
White
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
13
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
80
Percent Basic
16
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
80
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 238
LEVEL 1
25
11%
LEVEL 2
23
10%
LEVEL 3
60
25%
LEVEL 4
51
21%
General Education
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
14
8%
LEVEL 2
9
5%
LEVEL 3
53
30%
LEVEL 4
47
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
11
18%
LEVEL 2
14
23%
LEVEL 3
7
12%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
7
8%
LEVEL 2
12
13%
LEVEL 3
27
30%
LEVEL 4
16
18%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
13
24%
LEVEL 4
9
17%
White
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
10
16%
LEVEL 2
4
6%
LEVEL 3
7
11%
LEVEL 4
18
28%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
13
43%
LEVEL 4
8
27%
Female
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
11
9%
LEVEL 2
13
11%
LEVEL 3
33
28%
LEVEL 4
23
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
14
12%
LEVEL 2
10
8%
LEVEL 3
27
22%
LEVEL 4
28
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 209
LEVEL 1
18
9%
LEVEL 2
20
10%
LEVEL 3
54
26%
LEVEL 4
51
24%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
7
24%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
24
12%
LEVEL 2
19
9%
LEVEL 3
49
24%
LEVEL 4
41
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
4
12%
LEVEL 3
11
33%
LEVEL 4
10
30%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
238
178
60
2
26
90
54
64
2
30
117
121
209
29
205
33
3
235
PROFICIENT
47%
56%
18%
_%
_%
48%
41%
39%
_%
70%
48%
45%
50%
21%
44%
64%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
25
11%
14
8%
11
18%
_
_
_
_
7
8%
5
9%
10
16%
_
_
3
10%
11
9%
14
12%
18
9%
7
24%
24
12%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
23
10%
9
5%
14
23%
_
_
_
_
12
13%
5
9%
4
6%
_
_
2
7%
13
11%
10
8%
20
10%
3
10%
19
9%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
60
25%
53
30%
7
12%
_
_
_
_
27
30%
13
24%
7
11%
_
_
13
43%
33
28%
27
22%
54
26%
6
21%
49
24%
11
33%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
51
21%
47
26%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
16
18%
9
17%
18
28%
_
_
8
27%
23
20%
28
23%
51
24%
0
0%
41
20%
10
30%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 238
LEVEL 1
31
13%
LEVEL 2
44
18%
LEVEL 3
120
50%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
25
14%
LEVEL 2
25
14%
LEVEL 3
103
58%
LEVEL 4
3
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
6
10%
LEVEL 2
19
32%
LEVEL 3
17
28%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
14
16%
LEVEL 2
19
21%
LEVEL 3
44
49%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
7
13%
LEVEL 2
9
17%
LEVEL 3
25
46%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
7
11%
LEVEL 2
16
25%
LEVEL 3
29
45%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
73%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
15
13%
LEVEL 2
24
21%
LEVEL 3
62
53%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
16
13%
LEVEL 2
20
17%
LEVEL 3
58
48%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 209
LEVEL 1
23
11%
LEVEL 2
42
20%
LEVEL 3
105
50%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
8
28%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
15
52%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
29
14%
LEVEL 2
40
20%
LEVEL 3
98
48%
LEVEL 4
2
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
4
12%
LEVEL 3
22
67%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
238
178
60
2
26
90
54
64
2
30
117
121
209
29
205
33
3
235
PROFICIENT
52%
60%
30%
_%
_%
49%
46%
45%
_%
87%
55%
50%
52%
52%
49%
73%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
31
13%
25
14%
6
10%
_
_
_
_
14
16%
7
13%
7
11%
_
_
3
10%
15
13%
16
13%
23
11%
8
28%
29
14%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
44
18%
25
14%
19
32%
_
_
_
_
19
21%
9
17%
16
25%
_
_
0
0%
24
21%
20
17%
42
20%
2
7%
40
20%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
120
50%
103
58%
17
28%
_
_
_
_
44
49%
25
46%
29
45%
_
_
22
73%
62
53%
58
48%
105
50%
15
52%
98
48%
22
67%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
4
2%
3
2%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
4
13%
2
2%
2
2%
4
2%
0
0%
2
1%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 238
LEVEL 1
65
27%
LEVEL 2
38
16%
LEVEL 3
67
28%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
43
24%
LEVEL 2
28
16%
LEVEL 3
63
35%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
22
37%
LEVEL 2
10
17%
LEVEL 3
4
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
26
29%
LEVEL 2
20
22%
LEVEL 3
25
28%
LEVEL 4
1
1%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
19
35%
LEVEL 2
7
13%
LEVEL 3
11
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
14
22%
LEVEL 2
5
8%
LEVEL 3
18
28%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
6
20%
LEVEL 2
6
20%
LEVEL 3
13
43%
LEVEL 4
2
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
31
26%
LEVEL 2
20
17%
LEVEL 3
35
30%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
34
28%
LEVEL 2
18
15%
LEVEL 3
32
26%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 209
LEVEL 1
53
25%
LEVEL 2
32
15%
LEVEL 3
66
32%
LEVEL 4
4
2%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
12
41%
LEVEL 2
6
21%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
57
28%
LEVEL 2
34
17%
LEVEL 3
52
25%
LEVEL 4
3
1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
8
24%
LEVEL 2
4
12%
LEVEL 3
15
45%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
238
178
60
2
26
90
54
64
2
30
117
121
209
29
205
33
3
235
PROFICIENT
30%
38%
7%
_%
_%
29%
20%
30%
_%
50%
32%
28%
33%
3%
27%
48%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
65
27%
43
24%
22
37%
_
_
_
_
26
29%
19
35%
14
22%
_
_
6
20%
31
26%
34
28%
53
25%
12
41%
57
28%
8
24%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
38
16%
28
16%
10
17%
_
_
_
_
20
22%
7
13%
5
8%
_
_
6
20%
20
17%
18
15%
32
15%
6
21%
34
17%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
67
28%
63
35%
4
7%
_
_
_
_
25
28%
11
20%
18
28%
_
_
13
43%
35
30%
32
26%
66
32%
1
3%
52
25%
15
45%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
4
2%
4
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
1%
0
0%
1
2%
_
_
2
7%
2
2%
2
2%
4
2%
0
0%
3
1%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 238
LEVEL 1
33
14%
LEVEL 2
17
7%
LEVEL 3
86
36%
LEVEL 4
11
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
15
8%
LEVEL 2
11
6%
LEVEL 3
81
46%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
18
30%
LEVEL 2
6
10%
LEVEL 3
5
8%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
17
19%
LEVEL 2
4
4%
LEVEL 3
36
40%
LEVEL 4
3
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
5
9%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
White
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
6
9%
LEVEL 2
6
9%
LEVEL 3
21
33%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
6
20%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
14
47%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
19
16%
LEVEL 2
10
9%
LEVEL 3
41
35%
LEVEL 4
6
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
14
12%
LEVEL 2
7
6%
LEVEL 3
45
37%
LEVEL 4
5
4%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 209
LEVEL 1
26
12%
LEVEL 2
14
7%
LEVEL 3
83
40%
LEVEL 4
10
5%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
7
24%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
28
14%
LEVEL 2
15
7%
LEVEL 3
68
33%
LEVEL 4
9
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
18
55%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
238
178
60
2
26
90
54
64
2
30
117
121
209
29
205
33
3
235
PROFICIENT
41%
51%
10%
_%
_%
43%
31%
36%
_%
60%
40%
41%
44%
14%
38%
61%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
33
14%
15
8%
18
30%
_
_
_
_
17
19%
4
7%
6
9%
_
_
6
20%
19
16%
14
12%
26
12%
7
24%
28
14%
5
15%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
17
7%
11
6%
6
10%
_
_
_
_
4
4%
5
9%
6
9%
_
_
2
7%
10
9%
7
6%
14
7%
3
10%
15
7%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
86
36%
81
46%
5
8%
_
_
_
_
36
40%
15
28%
21
33%
_
_
14
47%
41
35%
45
37%
83
40%
3
10%
68
33%
18
55%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
11
5%
10
6%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
3
3%
2
4%
2
3%
_
_
4
13%
6
5%
5
4%
10
5%
1
3%
9
4%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 238
LEVEL 1
33
14%
LEVEL 2
44
18%
LEVEL 3
91
38%
LEVEL 4
11
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 178
LEVEL 1
21
12%
LEVEL 2
30
17%
LEVEL 3
81
46%
LEVEL 4
10
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
12
20%
LEVEL 2
14
23%
LEVEL 3
10
17%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 90
LEVEL 1
15
17%
LEVEL 2
19
21%
LEVEL 3
37
41%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
8
15%
LEVEL 2
8
15%
LEVEL 3
21
39%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
6
9%
LEVEL 2
14
22%
LEVEL 3
18
28%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
15
50%
LEVEL 4
5
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 117
LEVEL 1
20
17%
LEVEL 2
24
21%
LEVEL 3
49
42%
LEVEL 4
2
2%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 121
LEVEL 1
13
11%
LEVEL 2
20
17%
LEVEL 3
42
35%
LEVEL 4
9
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 209
LEVEL 1
24
11%
LEVEL 2
41
20%
LEVEL 3
83
40%
LEVEL 4
11
5%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
9
31%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
8
28%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 205
LEVEL 1
30
15%
LEVEL 2
40
20%
LEVEL 3
70
34%
LEVEL 4
9
4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
4
12%
LEVEL 3
21
64%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
238
178
60
2
26
90
54
64
2
30
117
121
209
29
205
33
3
235
PROFICIENT
43%
51%
18%
_%
_%
43%
39%
34%
_%
67%
44%
42%
45%
28%
39%
70%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
33
14%
21
12%
12
20%
_
_
_
_
15
17%
8
15%
6
9%
_
_
4
13%
20
17%
13
11%
24
11%
9
31%
30
15%
3
9%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
44
18%
30
17%
14
23%
_
_
_
_
19
21%
8
15%
14
22%
_
_
3
10%
24
21%
20
17%
41
20%
3
10%
40
20%
4
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
91
38%
81
46%
10
17%
_
_
_
_
37
41%
21
39%
18
28%
_
_
15
50%
49
42%
42
35%
83
40%
8
28%
70
34%
21
64%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
11
5%
10
6%
1
2%
_
_
_
_
2
2%
0
0%
4
6%
_
_
5
17%
2
2%
9
7%
11
5%
0
0%
9
4%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
52
24
2
14
32
11
16
1
14
34
42
51
25
69
7
1
75
LEVEL 1
31
41%
17
33%
14
58%
_
_
7
50%
11
34%
_
_
9
56%
_
_
4
29%
11
32%
20
48%
18
35%
13
52%
27
39%
4
57%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
16
21%
11
21%
5
21%
_
_
2
14%
9
28%
_
_
2
13%
_
_
3
21%
9
26%
7
17%
13
25%
3
12%
15
22%
1
14%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
23
30%
21
40%
2
8%
_
_
5
36%
11
34%
_
_
2
13%
_
_
5
36%
13
38%
10
24%
14
27%
9
36%
21
30%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
6
8%
3
6%
3
13%
_
_
0
0%
1
3%
_
_
3
19%
_
_
2
14%
1
3%
5
12%
6
12%
0
0%
6
9%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
31
41%
LEVEL 2
16
21%
LEVEL 3
23
30%
LEVEL 4
6
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
17
33%
LEVEL 2
11
21%
LEVEL 3
21
40%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
14
58%
LEVEL 2
5
21%
LEVEL 3
2
8%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
50%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
34%
LEVEL 2
9
28%
LEVEL 3
11
34%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
56%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
32%
LEVEL 2
9
26%
LEVEL 3
13
38%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
20
48%
LEVEL 2
7
17%
LEVEL 3
10
24%
LEVEL 4
5
12%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 51
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
18
35%
LEVEL 2
13
25%
LEVEL 3
14
27%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
13
52%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
9
36%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
27
39%
LEVEL 2
15
22%
LEVEL 3
21
30%
LEVEL 4
6
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
1
2
3
2
1
3
3
3
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
16
11
14
5
8
10
17
26
1
26
1
27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
4
25%
5
45%
6
43%
0
0%
3
38%
3
30%
6
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
33%
LEVEL 2
10
37%
5
31%
5
45%
4
29%
2
40%
4
50%
3
30%
7
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
37%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
7
44%
1
9%
4
29%
3
60%
1
13%
4
40%
4
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
10
37%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
25%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
7
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
35%
LEVEL 2
7
41%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
10
37%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Common Core Geometry
Regents Common Core Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
10
9
1
6
2
2
10
7
3
5
5
10
2
8
LEVEL 1
10
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
100%
_
_
_
_
5
100%
5
100%
10
100%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
14
14
1
4
1
7
1
7
8
6
14
10
4
14
LEVEL 1
12
86%
12
86%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
86%
_
_
6
86%
6
75%
6
100%
12
86%
_
_
_
_
12
86%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
2
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
14%
_
_
1
14%
2
25%
0
0%
2
14%
_
_
_
_
2
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
86%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
86%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Multiracial
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
75%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
100%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
86%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
12
86%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
76
58
18
1
10
31
17
17
11
41
35
62
14
65
11
1
75
55
38
50%
33
57%
5
28%
_
_
_
_
18
58%
7
41%
6
35%
7
64%
22
54%
16
46%
31
50%
7
50%
32
49%
6
55%
_
_
_
_
65
13
17%
13
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
7
23%
2
12%
3
18%
1
9%
8
20%
5
14%
13
21%
0
0%
9
14%
4
36%
_
_
_
_
85
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
6%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 76
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
50%
65
13
17%
85
1
1%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
57%
65
13
22%
85
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
28%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
58%
65
7
23%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
41%
65
2
12%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
35%
65
3
18%
85
1
6%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
64%
65
1
9%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
54%
65
8
20%
85
1
2%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
46%
65
5
14%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
50%
65
13
21%
85
1
2%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
50%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
49%
65
9
14%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
55%
65
4
36%
85
1
9%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
78
62
16
1
9
41
15
12
10
37
41
66
12
65
13
1
77
55
44
56%
41
66%
3
19%
_
_
_
_
22
54%
10
67%
7
58%
5
50%
20
54%
24
59%
39
59%
5
42%
37
57%
7
54%
_
_
_
_
65
31
40%
30
48%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
18
44%
7
47%
4
33%
2
20%
13
35%
18
44%
29
44%
2
17%
25
38%
6
46%
_
_
_
_
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 78
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
56%
65
31
40%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 62
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
41
66%
65
30
48%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
19%
65
1
6%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
54%
65
18
44%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
67%
65
7
47%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
58%
65
4
33%
85
0
0%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
50%
65
2
20%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
54%
65
13
35%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
24
59%
65
18
44%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 66
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
59%
65
29
44%
85
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
42%
65
2
17%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 65
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
57%
65
25
38%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
54%
65
6
46%
85
0
0%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
1
9
16
6
5
6
17
20
22
15
35
2
1
36
55
19
51%
18
56%
1
20%
_
_
3
33%
11
69%
2
33%
_
_
3
50%
7
41%
12
60%
13
59%
6
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
8
22%
7
22%
1
20%
_
_
1
11%
5
31%
1
17%
_
_
1
17%
1
6%
7
35%
5
23%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
51%
65
8
22%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
56%
65
7
22%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
1
20%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
33%
65
1
11%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
69%
65
5
31%
85
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
41%
65
1
6%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
12
60%
65
7
35%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
59%
65
5
23%
85
0
0%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
40%
65
3
20%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
5
4
1
1
3
1
5
4
1
5
3
2
5
55
3
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
60%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
65
1
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
20%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
1
20%
85
0
0%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
3
1
1
5
4
1
4
1
4
1
1
4
55
2
40%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
40%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
8
8
4
4
8
2
6
8
5
3
1
7
55
3
38%
3
38%
_
_
_
_
3
38%
_
_
_
_
3
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
2
25%
2
25%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
_
_
_
_
2
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
38%
65
2
25%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
38%
65
2
25%
85
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
38%
65
2
25%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
38%
65
2
25%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2016 - 17)
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
10
10
ENTERING
0%
0%
EMERGING
10%
10%
TRANSITIONING
70%
70%
EXPANDING
20%
20%
COMMANDING
0%
0%
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 10
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
10%
TRANSITIONING
70%
EXPANDING
20%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 10
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
10%
TRANSITIONING
70%
EXPANDING
20%
COMMANDING
0%
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
NO
NO
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
164
2
65
33
27
35
2
36
23
140
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
98%
―
―
―
―
―
―
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
NO
NO
―
YES
―
NO
―
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
184
2
73
43
19
44
3
47✝
21
155
PI
86
―
75
72
―
102
―
40✝
―
83
EAMO
170
―
153
151
―
171
―
130
―
160
Safe Harbor Target
86
―
87
79
―
87
―
55
―
82
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
164
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
184
PI
86
EAMO
170
Safe Harbor Target
86
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
73
PI
75
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
87
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
33
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
43
PI
72
EAMO
151
Safe Harbor Target
79
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
102
EAMO
171
Safe Harbor Target
87
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
47✝
PI
40✝
EAMO
130
Safe Harbor Target
55
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
23
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
140
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
155
PI
83
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
82
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
162
99
131
137
129
162
128
141
24
86
78
3
161
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
98%
99%
98%
98%
98%
100%
99%
―
98%
99%
―
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
182
111
141
165
140
181
137
163
29
95
89
3
181
PI
86
93
90
82
81
85
101
93
―
89
82
―
86
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
162
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
182
PI
86
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
111
PI
93
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
131
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
141
PI
90
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
137
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
82
Not White
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
140
PI
81
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
162
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
181
PI
85
General Education
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
137
PI
101
English Proficient
12th Graders
141
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
163
PI
93
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
29
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
86
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
89
Female
12th Graders
78
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
89
PI
82
Migrant
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
161
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
181
PI
86
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
164
2
65
33
27
35
2
36
23
140
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
97%
―
―
―
―
―
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
NO
NO
―
NO
―
NO
―
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
184
2
73
43
19
44
3
47✝
21
155
PI
70
―
59
56
―
66
―
47✝
―
66
EAMO
157
―
136
135
―
160
―
122
―
146
Safe Harbor Target
83
―
78
77
―
78
―
52
―
84
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
164
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
184
PI
70
EAMO
157
Safe Harbor Target
83
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
65
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
73
PI
59
EAMO
136
Safe Harbor Target
78
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
33
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
43
PI
56
EAMO
135
Safe Harbor Target
77
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
66
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
78
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
47✝
PI
47✝
EAMO
122
Safe Harbor Target
52
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
23
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
140
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
155
PI
66
EAMO
146
Safe Harbor Target
84
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
162
99
131
137
129
162
128
141
24
86
78
3
161
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
99%
98%
98%
98%
98%
100%
98%
―
98%
99%
―
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
182
111
141
165
140
181
137
163
29
95
89
3
181
PI
69
77
74
62
71
70
78
69
―
67
73
―
68
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
162
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
182
PI
69
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
99
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
111
PI
77
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
131
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
141
PI
74
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
137
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
165
PI
62
Not White
12th Graders
129
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
140
PI
71
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
162
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
181
PI
70
General Education
12th Graders
128
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
137
PI
78
English Proficient
12th Graders
141
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
163
PI
69
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
29
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
86
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
95
PI
67
Female
12th Graders
78
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
99%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
89
PI
73
Migrant
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
161
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
98%
2013 Accountability Cohort Members
181
PI
68
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
86
―
75
72
―
102
―
40
―
83
Secondary-Level MATH PI
70
―
59
56
―
66
―
47
―
66
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
78
0
67
64
0
84
0
44
0
75
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
86
Secondary-Level MATH PI
70
Unweighted Combined PI
78
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
75
Secondary-Level MATH PI
59
Unweighted Combined PI
67
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
72
Secondary-Level MATH PI
56
Unweighted Combined PI
64
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
102
Secondary-Level MATH PI
66
Unweighted Combined PI
84
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
40
Secondary-Level MATH PI
47
Unweighted Combined PI
44
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
83
Secondary-Level MATH PI
66
Unweighted Combined PI
75
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
―
NO
YES
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
YES
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
YES
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
YES
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
NO
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
YES
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
YES
NO
YES
―
NO
YES
YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
289
10
114
59
48
57
1
59✝
89‡
241
Graduation Rate
48%
―
52%
32%
50%
53%
―
27%✝
45%‡
46%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
80%
80%
―
80%
80%
80%
Progress Target
41%
―
47%
31%
55%
36%
―
30%
45%
42%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
289
Graduation Rate
48%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
41%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
52%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
47%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
59
Graduation Rate
32%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
31%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
48
Graduation Rate
50%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
55%
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
57
Graduation Rate
53%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
36%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
59✝
Graduation Rate
27%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
30%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
89‡
Graduation Rate
45%‡
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
45%
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
241
Graduation Rate
46%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
42%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ‡ Includes former english language learner students because the number of english language learner students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
NO
―
NO
NO
YES
NO
―
NO
NO
NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
5
114
58
42
61
0
52✝
86‡
207
Graduation Rate
43%
―
50%
29%
57%
36%
―
23%✝
45%‡
45%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
80%
80%
80%
―
80%
80%
80%
Progress Target
50%
―
54%
37%
57%
53%
―
34%
50%
50%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
43%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
50%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
114
Graduation Rate
50%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
54%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58
Graduation Rate
29%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
37%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
42
Graduation Rate
57%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
57%
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
61
Graduation Rate
36%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
53%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52✝
Graduation Rate
23%✝
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
34%
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
86‡
Graduation Rate
45%‡
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
50%
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
207
Graduation Rate
45%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
50%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30. ‡ Includes former english language learner students because the number of english language learner students in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
279
175
230
241
232
288
230
219
48
145
144
0
289
Graduation Rate
47%
45%
52%
47%
47%
48%
53%
52%
54%
43%
52%
―
48%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
275
166
222
238
219
280
228
200
73
140
140
0
280
Graduation Rate
44%
38%
46%
40%
45%
43%
47%
43%
37%
41%
44%
―
43%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
279
Graduation Rate
47%
Not Black or African American
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
175
Graduation Rate
45%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
230
Graduation Rate
52%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
241
Graduation Rate
47%
Not White
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
232
Graduation Rate
47%
Not Multiracial
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
288
Graduation Rate
48%
General Education
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
230
Graduation Rate
53%
English Proficient
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
219
Graduation Rate
52%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
48
Graduation Rate
54%
Male
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
145
Graduation Rate
43%
Female
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
144
Graduation Rate
52%
Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
289
Graduation Rate
48%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
275
Graduation Rate
44%
Not Black or African American
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
166
Graduation Rate
38%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
222
Graduation Rate
46%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
238
Graduation Rate
40%
Not White
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
219
Graduation Rate
45%
Not Multiracial
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
43%
General Education
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
228
Graduation Rate
47%
English Proficient
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
200
Graduation Rate
43%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
73
Graduation Rate
37%
Male
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
41%
Female
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
140
Graduation Rate
44%
Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
280
Graduation Rate
43%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
1%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
1%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
0%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
