LYNCOURT UFSD - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

LYNCOURT UFSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)

K-12 ENROLLMENT
340

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE
FEMALE

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

GROUP
TOTAL
PERCENT

LYNCOURT UFSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)

K-12 Enrollment: 340

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

176

52%

FEMALE

164

48%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

35

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

21

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

30

9%

WHITE

231

68%

MULTIRACIAL

22

6%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

67

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

226

66%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

PRE-K (FULL DAY)

36

11%

K (FULL DAY)

56

16%

1ST GRADE

30

9%

2ND GRADE

46

14%

3RD GRADE

34

10%

4TH GRADE

42

12%

5TH GRADE

34

10%

6TH GRADE

39

11%

UNGRADED ELEMENTARY

1

0%

7TH GRADE

25

7%

8TH GRADE

32

9%

UNGRADED SECONDARY

1

0%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
  • 173
  • 51%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
  • 38
  • 11%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)

Eligible for Free Lunch

173

51%

Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

38

11%

Grade 3 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 297

All Students

PROFICIENT

6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

19

59%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

14

74%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

11

79%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

12

55%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

19

59%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 32
  • 31
  • 1
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 19
  • 3
  • 13
  • 18
  • 14
  • 28
  • 4
  • 22
  • 10
  • 32
PROFICIENT
  • 6%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 5%
  • _%
  • 8%
  • 11%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 5%
  • 10%
  • 6%
LEVEL 1
  • 11
  • 34%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 54%
  • 8
  • 44%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 41%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 11
  • 34%
LEVEL 2
  • 19
  • 59%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 14
  • 74%
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 38%
  • 8
  • 44%
  • 11
  • 79%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 12
  • 55%
  • 7
  • 70%
  • 19
  • 59%
LEVEL 3
  • 2
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 5%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 2
  • 11%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 2
  • 6%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 4 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 286

All Students

PROFICIENT

31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

General Education

PROFICIENT

48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

11

100%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Male

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 32
  • 21
  • 11
  • 3
  • 3
  • 1
  • 22
  • 3
  • 10
  • 19
  • 13
  • 31
  • 1
  • 22
  • 10
  • 32
PROFICIENT
  • 31%
  • 48%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 41%
  • _%
  • 10%
  • 42%
  • 15%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 14%
  • 70%
  • 31%
LEVEL 1
  • 15
  • 47%
  • 4
  • 19%
  • 11
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 27%
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 90%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 7
  • 54%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 14
  • 64%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 15
  • 47%
LEVEL 2
  • 7
  • 22%
  • 7
  • 33%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 32%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • 4
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 23%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 7
  • 22%
LEVEL 3
  • 9
  • 28%
  • 9
  • 43%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 36%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 7
  • 37%
  • 2
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 14%
  • 6
  • 60%
  • 9
  • 28%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 3%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 5%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 1
  • 3%

Grade 5 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 276

All Students

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

Female

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Male

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

10

100%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

14

64%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 22
  • 19
  • 3
  • 2
  • 4
  • 2
  • 13
  • 1
  • 9
  • 16
  • 6
  • 22
  • 10
  • 12
  • 22
PROFICIENT
  • 14%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 15%
  • _%
  • 11%
  • 13%
  • 17%
  • 14%
  • 0%
  • 25%
  • 14%
LEVEL 1
  • 14
  • 64%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 54%
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 78%
  • 9
  • 56%
  • 5
  • 83%
  • 14
  • 64%
  • 10
  • 100%
  • 4
  • 33%
  • 14
  • 64%
LEVEL 2
  • 5
  • 23%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 5
  • 31%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 5
  • 23%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 5
  • 42%
  • 5
  • 23%
LEVEL 3
  • 2
  • 9%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 9%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 9%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 5%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 5%

Grade 6 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 303

All Students

PROFICIENT

32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

Male

PROFICIENT

30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

32%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 31
  • 28
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 23
  • 2
  • 8
  • 11
  • 20
  • 29
  • 2
  • 21
  • 10
  • 31
PROFICIENT
  • 32%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 39%
  • _%
  • 13%
  • 36%
  • 30%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 24%
  • 50%
  • 32%
LEVEL 1
  • 7
  • 23%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 50%
  • 2
  • 18%
  • 5
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 24%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 7
  • 23%
LEVEL 2
  • 14
  • 45%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 48%
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 5
  • 45%
  • 9
  • 45%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 52%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 14
  • 45%
LEVEL 3
  • 5
  • 16%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 2
  • 18%
  • 3
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 10%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 5
  • 16%
LEVEL 4
  • 5
  • 16%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 22%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 18%
  • 3
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 14%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 5
  • 16%

Grade 7 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 295

All Students

PROFICIENT

35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

General Education

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

5

100%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Male

PROFICIENT

19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 23
  • 18
  • 5
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 16
  • 1
  • 7
  • 7
  • 16
  • 21
  • 2
  • 16
  • 7
  • 23
PROFICIENT
  • 35%
  • 44%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 44%
  • _%
  • 14%
  • 71%
  • 19%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 19%
  • 71%
  • 35%
LEVEL 1
  • 8
  • 35%
  • 3
  • 17%
  • 5
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 25%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 7
  • 44%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 50%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 8
  • 35%
LEVEL 2
  • 7
  • 30%
  • 7
  • 39%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 6
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 31%
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 7
  • 30%
LEVEL 3
  • 7
  • 30%
  • 7
  • 39%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 3
  • 19%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 13%
  • 5
  • 71%
  • 7
  • 30%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 4%
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 6%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 6%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 4%

Grade 8 English Language Arts

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 298

All Students

PROFICIENT

27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

Female

PROFICIENT

22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 22
  • 19
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 18
  • 22
  • 9
  • 13
  • 20
  • 2
  • 12
  • 10
  • 22
PROFICIENT
  • 27%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 27%
  • 22%
  • 31%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 25%
  • 30%
  • 27%
LEVEL 1
  • 7
  • 32%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 32%
  • 3
  • 33%
  • 4
  • 31%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 42%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 7
  • 32%
LEVEL 2
  • 9
  • 41%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 41%
  • 4
  • 44%
  • 5
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 33%
  • 5
  • 50%
  • 9
  • 41%
LEVEL 3
  • 4
  • 18%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 18%
  • 2
  • 22%
  • 2
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 17%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 18%
LEVEL 4
  • 2
  • 9%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 9%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 2
  • 9%

Grade 3 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 286

All Students

PROFICIENT

16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

11

61%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Female

PROFICIENT

18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 31
  • 30
  • 1
  • 4
  • 3
  • 3
  • 18
  • 3
  • 13
  • 17
  • 14
  • 27
  • 4
  • 21
  • 10
  • 31
PROFICIENT
  • 16%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 11%
  • _%
  • 23%
  • 18%
  • 14%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 5%
  • 40%
  • 16%
LEVEL 1
  • 11
  • 35%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 28%
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 46%
  • 8
  • 47%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 43%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 11
  • 35%
LEVEL 2
  • 15
  • 48%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 61%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 31%
  • 6
  • 35%
  • 9
  • 64%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 52%
  • 4
  • 40%
  • 15
  • 48%
LEVEL 3
  • 4
  • 13%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 15%
  • 3
  • 18%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 40%
  • 4
  • 13%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 3%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 3%

Grade 4 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 283

All Students

PROFICIENT

29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

13

46%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

General Education

PROFICIENT

42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

Male

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

13

46%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 28
  • 19
  • 9
  • 3
  • 3
  • 1
  • 20
  • 1
  • 8
  • 16
  • 12
  • 27
  • 1
  • 18
  • 10
  • 28
PROFICIENT
  • 29%
  • 42%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 35%
  • _%
  • 13%
  • 38%
  • 17%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 11%
  • 60%
  • 29%
LEVEL 1
  • 13
  • 46%
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 8
  • 89%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 30%
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 88%
  • 7
  • 44%
  • 6
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 11
  • 61%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 13
  • 46%
LEVEL 2
  • 7
  • 25%
  • 6
  • 32%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 35%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 19%
  • 4
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 28%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 7
  • 25%
LEVEL 3
  • 5
  • 18%
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 20%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 13%
  • 3
  • 19%
  • 2
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 11%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 5
  • 18%
LEVEL 4
  • 3
  • 11%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 15%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 19%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 3
  • 11%

Grade 5 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 276

All Students

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

8

89%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 19
  • 16
  • 3
  • 1
  • 4
  • 2
  • 11
  • 1
  • 8
  • 14
  • 5
  • 19
  • 9
  • 10
  • 19
PROFICIENT
  • 11%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 18%
  • _%
  • 0%
  • 7%
  • 20%
  • 11%
  • 0%
  • 20%
  • 11%
LEVEL 1
  • 13
  • 68%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 64%
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 75%
  • 10
  • 71%
  • 3
  • 60%
  • 13
  • 68%
  • 8
  • 89%
  • 5
  • 50%
  • 13
  • 68%
LEVEL 2
  • 4
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 18%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 25%
  • 3
  • 21%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 21%
  • 1
  • 11%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 4
  • 21%
LEVEL 3
  • 1
  • 5%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 9%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 7%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 1
  • 5%
LEVEL 4
  • 1
  • 5%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 9%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • 1
  • 5%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 1
  • 5%

Grade 6 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 317

All Students

PROFICIENT

48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

Male

PROFICIENT

47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 29
  • 27
  • 2
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 22
  • 2
  • 7
  • 10
  • 19
  • 27
  • 2
  • 19
  • 10
  • 29
PROFICIENT
  • 48%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 64%
  • _%
  • 0%
  • 50%
  • 47%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 37%
  • 70%
  • 48%
LEVEL 1
  • 5
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 9%
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 3
  • 16%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 26%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 5
  • 17%
LEVEL 2
  • 10
  • 34%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 27%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 7
  • 37%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 37%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 10
  • 34%
LEVEL 3
  • 6
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 27%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 4
  • 21%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 21%
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 6
  • 21%
LEVEL 4
  • 8
  • 28%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 36%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 5
  • 26%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 16%
  • 5
  • 50%
  • 8
  • 28%

Grade 7 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 296

All Students

PROFICIENT

29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 24
  • 19
  • 5
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 17
  • 1
  • 7
  • 7
  • 17
  • 22
  • 2
  • 17
  • 7
  • 24
PROFICIENT
  • 29%
  • 37%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 29%
  • _%
  • 29%
  • 43%
  • 24%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 24%
  • 43%
  • 29%
LEVEL 1
  • 8
  • 33%
  • 4
  • 21%
  • 4
  • 80%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 24%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 7
  • 41%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 47%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 8
  • 33%
LEVEL 2
  • 9
  • 38%
  • 8
  • 42%
  • 1
  • 20%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 47%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 14%
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 6
  • 35%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 29%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 9
  • 38%
LEVEL 3
  • 7
  • 29%
  • 7
  • 37%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 29%
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 4
  • 24%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 24%
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 7
  • 29%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%

Grade 8 Mathematics

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 287

All Students

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 14
  • 12
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 12
  • 14
  • 6
  • 8
  • 13
  • 1
  • 7
  • 7
  • 14
PROFICIENT
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 0%
  • 0%
  • 0%
LEVEL 1
  • 6
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 6
  • 43%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 3
  • 43%
  • 6
  • 43%
LEVEL 2
  • 8
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 57%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 5
  • 63%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 4
  • 57%
  • 8
  • 57%
LEVEL 3
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test

Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE

5

83%

LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE

6

100%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 6
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 3
  • 1
  • 17%
4 & ABOVE
  • 5
  • 83%
3 & ABOVE
  • 6
  • 100%

Grade 4 Science

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 76

All Students

PROFICIENT

73%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

15

41%

General Education

PROFICIENT

92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

14

54%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

89%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

14

52%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Female

PROFICIENT

70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

9

45%

Male

PROFICIENT

76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

8

67%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

73%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

15

41%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 37
  • 26
  • 11
  • 3
  • 3
  • 1
  • 27
  • 3
  • 10
  • 20
  • 17
  • 36
  • 1
  • 25
  • 12
  • 37
PROFICIENT
  • 73%
  • 92%
  • 27%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 89%
  • _%
  • 30%
  • 70%
  • 76%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 64%
  • 92%
  • 73%
LEVEL 1
  • 4
  • 11%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 36%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 40%
  • 2
  • 10%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 4
  • 16%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 4
  • 11%
LEVEL 2
  • 6
  • 16%
  • 2
  • 8%
  • 4
  • 36%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 11%
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 30%
  • 4
  • 20%
  • 2
  • 12%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 20%
  • 1
  • 8%
  • 6
  • 16%
LEVEL 3
  • 12
  • 32%
  • 10
  • 38%
  • 2
  • 18%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 10
  • 37%
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 20%
  • 5
  • 25%
  • 7
  • 41%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 36%
  • 3
  • 25%
  • 12
  • 32%
LEVEL 4
  • 15
  • 41%
  • 14
  • 54%
  • 1
  • 9%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 14
  • 52%
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 10%
  • 9
  • 45%
  • 6
  • 35%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 28%
  • 8
  • 67%
  • 15
  • 41%

Grade 8 Science

Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.

Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

MEAN SCORE: 68

All Students

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

General Education

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

12

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Female

PROFICIENT

44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Male

PROFICIENT

64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

9

64%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 23
  • 20
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 17
  • 6
  • 9
  • 14
  • 20
  • 3
  • 15
  • 8
  • 23
PROFICIENT
  • 57%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 71%
  • 17%
  • 44%
  • 64%
  • _%
  • _%
  • 53%
  • 63%
  • 57%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 10
  • 43%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 29%
  • 5
  • 83%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • 5
  • 36%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 7
  • 47%
  • 3
  • 38%
  • 10
  • 43%
LEVEL 3
  • 13
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 12
  • 71%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 4
  • 44%
  • 9
  • 64%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 8
  • 53%
  • 5
  • 63%
  • 13
  • 57%
LEVEL 4
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test

Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

All Students

PROFICIENT

100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 9
PROFICIENT
  • 100%
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 3
  • 4
  • 44%
LEVEL 4
  • 5
  • 56%

Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)

Grade: 4

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 32%
  • *%
  • 20%
  • 48%
  • 44%
  • 20%
  • *%
  • 70%
  • 74%
  • 43%
BASIC
  • 32%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 34%
  • 37%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 22%
  • 21%
  • 36%
PROFICIENT
  • 27%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 15%
  • 17%
  • 37%
  • *%
  • 7%
  • 4%
  • 18%
ADVANCED
  • 9%
  • *%
  • 17%
  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 12%
  • *%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 88

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

32

Percent Basic

32

Percent Proficient

27

Percent Advanced

9

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

33

Percent Advanced

17

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

34

Percent Proficient

15

Percent Advanced

3

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

44

Percent Basic

37

Percent Proficient

17

Percent Advanced

2

White
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

37

Percent Advanced

12

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

70

Percent Basic

22

Percent Proficient

7

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

74

Percent Basic

21

Percent Proficient

4

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

88

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

43

Percent Basic

36

Percent Proficient

18

Percent Advanced

3

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 21%
  • *%
  • 12%
  • 40%
  • 28%
  • 12%
  • *%
  • 49%
  • 56%
  • 29%
BASIC
  • 44%
  • *%
  • 31%
  • 46%
  • 51%
  • 41%
  • *%
  • 39%
  • 35%
  • 48%
PROFICIENT
  • 30%
  • *%
  • 42%
  • 13%
  • 20%
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 10%
  • 9%
  • 21%
ADVANCED
  • 5%
  • *%
  • 15%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 7%
  • *%
  • 2%
  • *%
  • 2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 91

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

21

Percent Basic

44

Percent Proficient

30

Percent Advanced

5

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

12

Percent Basic

31

Percent Proficient

42

Percent Advanced

15

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

40

Percent Basic

46

Percent Proficient

13

Percent Advanced

1

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

28

Percent Basic

51

Percent Proficient

20

Percent Advanced

1

White
Percent Below Basic

12

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

40

Percent Advanced

7

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

49

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

10

Percent Advanced

2

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

56

Percent Basic

35

Percent Proficient

9

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

91

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

29

Percent Basic

48

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

2

Grade: 8

Reading

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 27%
  • *%
  • 19%
  • 42%
  • 35%
  • 18%
  • *%
  • 59%
  • 78%
  • 36%
BASIC
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 39%
  • 41%
  • 43%
  • 39%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 19%
  • 42%
PROFICIENT
  • 29%
  • *%
  • 34%
  • 16%
  • 20%
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 3%
  • 21%
ADVANCED
  • 4%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 1%
  • 2%
  • 5%
  • *%
  • *%
  • *%
  • 1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 98
  • 89

Reading

All Students
Percent Below Basic

27

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

29

Percent Advanced

4

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

19

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

34

Percent Advanced

8

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

42

Percent Basic

41

Percent Proficient

16

Percent Advanced

1

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

35

Percent Basic

43

Percent Proficient

20

Percent Advanced

2

White
Percent Below Basic

18

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

38

Percent Advanced

5

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

59

Percent Basic

33

Percent Proficient

8

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

98

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

78

Percent Basic

19

Percent Proficient

3

Percent Advanced

*

Participation Rate

89

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

36

Percent Basic

42

Percent Proficient

21

Percent Advanced

1

Mathematics

GROUP
  • All Students
  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino
  • White
  • Multiracial
  • Students with Disabilities
  • English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 18%
  • 48%
  • 41%
  • 20%
  • *%
  • 64%
  • 72%
  • 40%
BASIC
  • 38%
  • *%
  • 30%
  • 37%
  • 40%
  • 40%
  • *%
  • 27%
  • 21%
  • 39%
PROFICIENT
  • 24%
  • *%
  • 33%
  • 13%
  • 16%
  • 31%
  • *%
  • 8%
  • 6%
  • 17%
ADVANCED
  • 7%
  • *%
  • 19%
  • 2%
  • 3%
  • 9%
  • *%
  • 1%
  • 1%
  • 4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
  • 99
  • 94

Mathematics

All Students
Percent Below Basic

31

Percent Basic

38

Percent Proficient

24

Percent Advanced

7

American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic

18

Percent Basic

30

Percent Proficient

33

Percent Advanced

19

Black or African American
Percent Below Basic

48

Percent Basic

37

Percent Proficient

13

Percent Advanced

2

Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic

41

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

16

Percent Advanced

3

White
Percent Below Basic

20

Percent Basic

40

Percent Proficient

31

Percent Advanced

9

Multiracial
Percent Below Basic

*

Percent Basic

*

Percent Proficient

*

Percent Advanced

*

Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic

64

Percent Basic

27

Percent Proficient

8

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

99

English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic

72

Percent Basic

21

Percent Proficient

6

Percent Advanced

1

Participation Rate

94

Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic

40

Percent Basic

39

Percent Proficient

17

Percent Advanced

4

Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)

Algebra I (Common Core)

Algebra I (Common Core)

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • White
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 6
  • 6
  • 6
  • 2
  • 4
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2
  • 6
LEVEL 1
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 2
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 0
  • 0%
LEVEL 3
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • 1
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 17%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 1
  • 17%
LEVEL 4
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • 3
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 50%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 3
  • 50%
LEVEL 5
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 33%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 2
  • 33%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

LEVEL 5

2

33%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

LEVEL 5

2

33%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

LEVEL 5

2

33%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

LEVEL 5

2

33%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

LEVEL 5

2

33%

Living Environment

Regents Living Environment

GROUP
  • All Students
  • General Education
  • White
  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-English Language Learners
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Economically Disadvantaged
  • Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
  • 9
  • 9
  • 9
  • 2
  • 7
  • 9
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9
55
  • 9
  • 100%
  • 9
  • 100%
  • 9
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 100%
65
  • 9
  • 100%
  • 9
  • 100%
  • 9
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 100%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 9
  • 100%
85
  • 5
  • 56%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • 5
  • 56%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 56%
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • 5
  • 56%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

9

100%

65

9

100%

85

5

56%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

9

100%

65

9

100%

85

5

56%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

9

100%

65

9

100%

85

5

56%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

9

100%

65

9

100%

85

5

56%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

9

100%

65

9

100%

85

5

56%

New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2015 - 16)

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
PROFICIENT
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
  • _%
LEVEL 1
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
LEVEL 2
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
LEVEL 3
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
LEVEL 4
  • _
  • _
  • _
  • _
Grade 5 ELA

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Grade 5 Math

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Grade 7 ELA

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

Grade 7 Math

PROFICIENT


_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

LEVEL 2

_

LEVEL 3

_

LEVEL 4

_

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2015 - 16)

Kindergarten

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _
  • _

Grade 1

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 2
  • 2
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _

Grade 2

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 7
  • 6
  • 1
ENTERING
  • 14%
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • 0%
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • 29%
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • 57%
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • 0%
  • _
  • _

Grade 3

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 4
  • 4
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _

Grade 4

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 1
  • 1
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _

Grade 6

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 2
  • 2
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _

Grade 7

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 2
  • 2
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _

Grade 8

GROUP
TOTAL TESTED
  • 3
  • 3
ENTERING
  • _
  • _
EMERGING
  • _
  • _
TRANSITIONING
  • _
  • _
EXPANDING
  • _
  • _
COMMANDING
  • _
  • _

Kindergarten

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 1

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 2

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING

14%

EMERGING

0%

TRANSITIONING

29%

EXPANDING

57%

COMMANDING

0%

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 3

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 4

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 6

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 7

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Grade 8

All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING

_

EMERGING

_

TRANSITIONING

_

EXPANDING

_

COMMANDING

_

Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

422*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

158

PI

88

EAMO

96

Safe Harbor Target

96

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

22

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

14

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

12

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

9

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

18

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

16

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

302*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

81%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

109

PI

106

EAMO

109

Safe Harbor Target

108

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

11

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

10

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

36

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

27

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

12

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

10

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

265*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

100

PI

67

EAMO

83

Safe Harbor Target

83

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 422*
  • 372*
  • 397*
  • 394*
  • 120*
  • 405*
  • 341*
  • 403*
  • 157*
  • 217*
  • 205*
  • 0
  • 422*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 83%*
  • 83%*
  • 83%*
  • 82%*
  • 86%*
  • 82%*
  • 84%*
  • 82%*
  • 82%*
  • 83%*
  • 82%*
  • 83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 158
  • 144
  • 149
  • 142
  • 49
  • 148
  • 131
  • 148
  • 58
  • 79
  • 79
  • 0
  • 158
PI
  • 88
  • 93
  • 91
  • 92
  • 47
  • 89
  • 101
  • 93
  • 124
  • 87
  • 89
  • 88
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

422*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

158

PI

88

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

372*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

144

PI

93

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

397*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

149

PI

91

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

394*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

82%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

142

PI

92

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

120*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

86%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

49

PI

47

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

405*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

82%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

148

PI

89

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

341*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

84%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

131

PI

101

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

403*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

82%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

148

PI

93

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

157*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

82%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

58

PI

124

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

217*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

79

PI

87

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

205*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

82%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

79

PI

89

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

422*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

83%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

158

PI

88

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.

Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 95%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Safe Harbor Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

422*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

147

PI

93

EAMO

92

Safe Harbor Target

92

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

22

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

12

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

12

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

9

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

18

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

14

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

302*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

104

PI

110

EAMO

105

Safe Harbor Target

105

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

11

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

8

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

36

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

23

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

12

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

9

PI

EAMO

Safe Harbor Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%

NO

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

265*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

92

PI

76

EAMO

81

Safe Harbor Target

81

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 422*
  • 372*
  • 397*
  • 394*
  • 120*
  • 405*
  • 341*
  • 403*
  • 157*
  • 217*
  • 205*
  • 0
  • 422*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 77%*
  • 79%*
  • 77%*
  • 76%*
  • 77%*
  • 77%*
  • 80%*
  • 77%*
  • 78%*
  • 79%*
  • 75%*
  • 77%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 147
  • 135
  • 138
  • 133
  • 43
  • 139
  • 124
  • 138
  • 55
  • 76
  • 71
  • 0
  • 147
PI
  • 93
  • 99
  • 96
  • 96
  • 53
  • 94
  • 105
  • 97
  • 122
  • 101
  • 85
  • 93
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

422*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

147

PI

93

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

372*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

79%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

135

PI

99

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

397*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

138

PI

96

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

394*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

76%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

133

PI

96

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

120*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

43

PI

53

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

405*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

139

PI

94

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

341*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

80%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

124

PI

105

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

403*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

138

PI

97

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

157*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

78%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

55

PI

122

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

217*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

79%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

76

PI

101

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

205*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

75%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

71

PI

85

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

422*

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

77%*

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

147

PI

93

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.

Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP
MADE AYP
Tested 80%
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
PI
EAMO
Progress Target
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

76

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

91%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

65

PI

165

EAMO

175

Progress Target

172

American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

8

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

5

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

1

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

1

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

6

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

6

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

58

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

91%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

YES

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

50

PI

184

EAMO

181

Progress Target

180

Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

3

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

3

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

15

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

14

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

4

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

4

PI

EAMO

Progress Target

Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%

YES

Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

49

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%

PI >= EAMO or Progress Target

NO

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

40

PI

153

EAMO

165

Progress Target

160

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
  • 76
  • 68
  • 75
  • 70
  • 18
  • 73
  • 61
  • 72
  • 27
  • 40
  • 36
  • 0
  • 76
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
  • 91%
  • 93%
  • 91%
  • 90%
  • 90%
  • 90%
  • 90%
  • 95%
  • 91%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
  • 65
  • 60
  • 64
  • 59
  • 15
  • 62
  • 51
  • 61
  • 25
  • 35
  • 30
  • 0
  • 65
PI
  • 165
  • 172
  • 166
  • 168
  • 169
  • 180
  • 169
  • 171
  • 157
  • 165
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

76

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

91%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

65

PI

165

Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

68

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

93%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

60

PI

172

Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

75

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

91%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

64

PI

166

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

70

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

59

PI

168

Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

18

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

15

PI

Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

73

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

62

PI

169

General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

61

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

51

PI

180

English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

72

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

90%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

61

PI

169

Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

27

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

25

PI

Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

40

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

95%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

35

PI

171

Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

36

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

30

PI

157

Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

0

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

0

PI

Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period

76

Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores

91%

Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day

65

PI

165

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

GROUP
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
  • 88
  • 106
  • 67
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
  • 93
  • 110
  • 76
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
  • 91
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 108
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 72
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
88
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
93
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
91
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
106
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
110
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
108
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
67
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
76
Secondary-Level ELA PI
Secondary-Level MATH PI
Unweighted Combined PI
72
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.