FAYETTEVILLE-MANLIUS CSD - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
23%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
23%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
7%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
6
5
49
112
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
6
Assistant Principals
5
Other Professional Staff
49
Paraprofessionals
112
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
331
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
2%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
37%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
790
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
1,073
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 331
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
0%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
2%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
37%
Total Number of Core Classes
790
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
0%
Total Number of Classes
1,073
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
0%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
333
309
24
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
330
309
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
325
98%
309
100%
16
76%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
240
73%
237
77%
3
14%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
2%
0
0%
5
24%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
1%
0
0%
3
13%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
333
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
330
Regents Diploma
325
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
240
73%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
309
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
309
Regents Diploma
309
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
237
77%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
24
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
16
76%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
14%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
24%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
13%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
333
309
24
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
330
309
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
325
98%
309
100%
16
76%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
240
73%
237
77%
3
14%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
2%
0
0%
5
24%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
1%
0
0%
3
13%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
333
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
330
Regents Diploma
325
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
240
73%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
309
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
309
Regents Diploma
309
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
237
77%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
24
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
16
76%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
14%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
24%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
13%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
333
309
24
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
330
309
21
REGENTS DIPLOMA
325
98%
309
100%
16
76%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
240
73%
237
77%
3
14%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
5
2%
0
0%
5
24%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
3
1%
0
0%
3
13%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
333
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
330
Regents Diploma
325
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
240
73%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
1%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
309
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
309
Regents Diploma
309
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
237
77%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
24
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
21
Regents Diploma
16
76%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
3
14%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
5
24%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
3
13%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
4
0%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
4
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
0%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
4
0%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
4
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
0%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
4
0%
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
4
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
3
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
7
0%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
263
79%
255
83%
8
33%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
53
16%
44
14%
9
38%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
3
1%
3
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
0%
1
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
1%
1
0%
1
4%
TO ADULT SERVICES
3
1%
0
0%
3
13%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
8
2%
5
2%
3
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
263
79%
To Two-Year College
53
16%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
1
0%
To Employment
2
1%
To Adult Services
3
1%
To Other Known Plans
8
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
255
83%
To Two-Year College
44
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
1
0%
To Employment
1
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
5
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
8
33%
To Two-Year College
9
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
4%
To Adult Services
3
13%
To Other Known Plans
3
13%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
263
79%
255
83%
8
33%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
53
16%
44
14%
9
38%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
3
1%
3
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
0%
1
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
1%
1
0%
1
4%
TO ADULT SERVICES
3
1%
0
0%
3
13%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
8
2%
5
2%
3
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
263
79%
To Two-Year College
53
16%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
1
0%
To Employment
2
1%
To Adult Services
3
1%
To Other Known Plans
8
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
255
83%
To Two-Year College
44
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
1
0%
To Employment
1
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
5
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
8
33%
To Two-Year College
9
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
4%
To Adult Services
3
13%
To Other Known Plans
3
13%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
263
79%
255
83%
8
33%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
53
16%
44
14%
9
38%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
3
1%
3
1%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
1
0%
1
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
1%
1
0%
1
4%
TO ADULT SERVICES
3
1%
0
0%
3
13%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
8
2%
5
2%
3
13%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
263
79%
To Two-Year College
53
16%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
1
0%
To Employment
2
1%
To Adult Services
3
1%
To Other Known Plans
8
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
255
83%
To Two-Year College
44
14%
To Other Post-Secondary
3
1%
To the Military
1
0%
To Employment
1
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
5
2%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
8
33%
To Two-Year College
9
38%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
1
4%
To Adult Services
3
13%
To Other Known Plans
3
13%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
36
15%
LEVEL 2
81
33%
LEVEL 3
100
41%
LEVEL 4
29
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 232
LEVEL 1
26
11%
LEVEL 2
78
34%
LEVEL 3
99
43%
LEVEL 4
29
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
10
71%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
10
32%
LEVEL 3
12
39%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
White
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 191
LEVEL 1
29
15%
LEVEL 2
62
32%
LEVEL 3
78
41%
LEVEL 4
22
12%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
4
57%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 127
LEVEL 1
17
13%
LEVEL 2
35
28%
LEVEL 3
55
43%
LEVEL 4
20
16%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119
LEVEL 1
19
16%
LEVEL 2
46
39%
LEVEL 3
45
38%
LEVEL 4
9
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 245
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
10
33%
LEVEL 2
12
40%
LEVEL 3
8
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
26
12%
LEVEL 2
69
32%
LEVEL 3
92
43%
LEVEL 4
29
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
36
15%
LEVEL 2
81
33%
LEVEL 3
100
41%
LEVEL 4
29
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
246
232
14
31
8
9
191
7
127
119
245
1
30
216
246
PROFICIENT
52%
55%
7%
55%
50%
44%
52%
57%
59%
45%
_%
_%
27%
56%
52%
LEVEL 1
36
15%
26
11%
10
71%
4
13%
2
25%
1
11%
29
15%
0
0%
17
13%
19
16%
_
_
_
_
10
33%
26
12%
36
15%
LEVEL 2
81
33%
78
34%
3
21%
10
32%
2
25%
4
44%
62
32%
3
43%
35
28%
46
39%
_
_
_
_
12
40%
69
32%
81
33%
LEVEL 3
100
41%
99
43%
1
7%
12
39%
3
38%
3
33%
78
41%
4
57%
55
43%
45
38%
_
_
_
_
8
27%
92
43%
100
41%
LEVEL 4
29
12%
29
13%
0
0%
5
16%
1
13%
1
11%
22
12%
0
0%
20
16%
9
8%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
29
13%
29
12%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 322
All Students
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 269
LEVEL 1
25
9%
LEVEL 2
75
28%
LEVEL 3
97
36%
LEVEL 4
72
27%
General Education
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
16
7%
LEVEL 2
65
26%
LEVEL 3
93
38%
LEVEL 4
72
29%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
9
39%
LEVEL 2
10
43%
LEVEL 3
4
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
4
13%
LEVEL 3
6
20%
LEVEL 4
19
63%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 223
LEVEL 1
20
9%
LEVEL 2
65
29%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
52
23%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 124
LEVEL 1
9
7%
LEVEL 2
25
20%
LEVEL 3
45
36%
LEVEL 4
45
36%
Male
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 145
LEVEL 1
16
11%
LEVEL 2
50
34%
LEVEL 3
52
36%
LEVEL 4
27
19%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 268
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 242
LEVEL 1
16
7%
LEVEL 2
68
28%
LEVEL 3
89
37%
LEVEL 4
69
29%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 269
LEVEL 1
25
9%
LEVEL 2
75
28%
LEVEL 3
97
36%
LEVEL 4
72
27%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
269
246
23
30
7
4
223
5
9
124
145
268
1
27
242
269
PROFICIENT
63%
67%
17%
83%
0%
_%
62%
_%
67%
73%
54%
_%
_%
41%
65%
63%
LEVEL 1
25
9%
16
7%
9
39%
1
3%
3
43%
_
_
20
9%
_
_
1
11%
9
7%
16
11%
_
_
_
_
9
33%
16
7%
25
9%
LEVEL 2
75
28%
65
26%
10
43%
4
13%
4
57%
_
_
65
29%
_
_
2
22%
25
20%
50
34%
_
_
_
_
7
26%
68
28%
75
28%
LEVEL 3
97
36%
93
38%
4
17%
6
20%
0
0%
_
_
86
39%
_
_
5
56%
45
36%
52
36%
_
_
_
_
8
30%
89
37%
97
36%
LEVEL 4
72
27%
72
29%
0
0%
19
63%
0
0%
_
_
52
23%
_
_
1
11%
45
36%
27
19%
_
_
_
_
3
11%
69
29%
72
27%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 315
All Students
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
46
19%
LEVEL 2
65
26%
LEVEL 3
82
33%
LEVEL 4
53
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 229
LEVEL 1
34
15%
LEVEL 2
60
26%
LEVEL 3
82
36%
LEVEL 4
53
23%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
12
71%
LEVEL 2
5
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
12
48%
LEVEL 4
7
28%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 195
LEVEL 1
36
18%
LEVEL 2
50
26%
LEVEL 3
64
33%
LEVEL 4
45
23%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
5
42%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
14
12%
LEVEL 2
28
24%
LEVEL 3
49
42%
LEVEL 4
27
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 128
LEVEL 1
32
25%
LEVEL 2
37
29%
LEVEL 3
33
26%
LEVEL 4
26
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
46
19%
LEVEL 2
65
26%
LEVEL 3
82
33%
LEVEL 4
53
22%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
10
43%
LEVEL 2
6
26%
LEVEL 3
5
22%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 223
LEVEL 1
36
16%
LEVEL 2
59
26%
LEVEL 3
77
35%
LEVEL 4
51
23%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 246
LEVEL 1
46
19%
LEVEL 2
65
26%
LEVEL 3
82
33%
LEVEL 4
53
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
246
229
17
25
14
9
195
3
12
118
128
246
23
223
246
PROFICIENT
55%
59%
0%
76%
21%
_%
56%
_%
33%
64%
46%
55%
30%
57%
55%
LEVEL 1
46
19%
34
15%
12
71%
1
4%
6
43%
_
_
36
18%
_
_
3
25%
14
12%
32
25%
46
19%
10
43%
36
16%
46
19%
LEVEL 2
65
26%
60
26%
5
29%
5
20%
5
36%
_
_
50
26%
_
_
5
42%
28
24%
37
29%
65
26%
6
26%
59
26%
65
26%
LEVEL 3
82
33%
82
36%
0
0%
12
48%
2
14%
_
_
64
33%
_
_
4
33%
49
42%
33
26%
82
33%
5
22%
77
35%
82
33%
LEVEL 4
53
22%
53
23%
0
0%
7
28%
1
7%
_
_
45
23%
_
_
0
0%
27
23%
26
20%
53
22%
2
9%
51
23%
53
22%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 319
All Students
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
35
13%
LEVEL 2
101
37%
LEVEL 3
47
17%
LEVEL 4
93
34%
General Education
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 255
LEVEL 1
18
7%
LEVEL 2
98
38%
LEVEL 3
46
18%
LEVEL 4
93
36%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
17
81%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
8
29%
LEVEL 3
3
11%
LEVEL 4
16
57%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
4
80%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 237
LEVEL 1
32
14%
LEVEL 2
87
37%
LEVEL 3
43
18%
LEVEL 4
75
32%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 141
LEVEL 1
12
9%
LEVEL 2
45
32%
LEVEL 3
26
18%
LEVEL 4
58
41%
Male
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 135
LEVEL 1
23
17%
LEVEL 2
56
41%
LEVEL 3
21
16%
LEVEL 4
35
26%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
35
13%
LEVEL 2
101
37%
LEVEL 3
47
17%
LEVEL 4
93
34%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
7
32%
LEVEL 2
9
41%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 254
LEVEL 1
28
11%
LEVEL 2
92
36%
LEVEL 3
44
17%
LEVEL 4
90
35%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
35
13%
LEVEL 2
101
37%
LEVEL 3
47
17%
LEVEL 4
93
34%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
276
255
21
28
4
5
237
2
6
141
135
276
22
254
276
PROFICIENT
51%
55%
5%
68%
_%
0%
50%
_%
50%
60%
41%
51%
27%
53%
51%
LEVEL 1
35
13%
18
7%
17
81%
1
4%
_
_
1
20%
32
14%
_
_
1
17%
12
9%
23
17%
35
13%
7
32%
28
11%
35
13%
LEVEL 2
101
37%
98
38%
3
14%
8
29%
_
_
4
80%
87
37%
_
_
2
33%
45
32%
56
41%
101
37%
9
41%
92
36%
101
37%
LEVEL 3
47
17%
46
18%
1
5%
3
11%
_
_
0
0%
43
18%
_
_
1
17%
26
18%
21
16%
47
17%
3
14%
44
17%
47
17%
LEVEL 4
93
34%
93
36%
0
0%
16
57%
_
_
0
0%
75
32%
_
_
2
33%
58
41%
35
26%
93
34%
3
14%
90
35%
93
34%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 320
All Students
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 304
LEVEL 1
35
12%
LEVEL 2
80
26%
LEVEL 3
129
42%
LEVEL 4
60
20%
General Education
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 277
LEVEL 1
16
6%
LEVEL 2
74
27%
LEVEL 3
127
46%
LEVEL 4
60
22%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
19
70%
LEVEL 2
6
22%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
52%
LEVEL 4
12
39%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
5
71%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 255
LEVEL 1
30
12%
LEVEL 2
67
26%
LEVEL 3
110
43%
LEVEL 4
48
19%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
2
40%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 165
LEVEL 1
12
7%
LEVEL 2
38
23%
LEVEL 3
74
45%
LEVEL 4
41
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
23
17%
LEVEL 2
42
30%
LEVEL 3
55
40%
LEVEL 4
19
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 301
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
11
31%
LEVEL 2
17
49%
LEVEL 3
6
17%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 269
LEVEL 1
24
9%
LEVEL 2
63
23%
LEVEL 3
123
46%
LEVEL 4
59
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 304
LEVEL 1
35
12%
LEVEL 2
80
26%
LEVEL 3
129
42%
LEVEL 4
60
20%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
304
277
27
1
31
7
6
255
4
5
165
139
301
3
35
269
304
PROFICIENT
62%
68%
7%
_%
90%
14%
17%
62%
_%
20%
70%
53%
_%
_%
20%
68%
62%
LEVEL 1
35
12%
16
6%
19
70%
_
_
1
3%
1
14%
1
17%
30
12%
_
_
2
40%
12
7%
23
17%
_
_
_
_
11
31%
24
9%
35
12%
LEVEL 2
80
26%
74
27%
6
22%
_
_
2
6%
5
71%
4
67%
67
26%
_
_
2
40%
38
23%
42
30%
_
_
_
_
17
49%
63
23%
80
26%
LEVEL 3
129
42%
127
46%
2
7%
_
_
16
52%
1
14%
1
17%
110
43%
_
_
1
20%
74
45%
55
40%
_
_
_
_
6
17%
123
46%
129
42%
LEVEL 4
60
20%
60
22%
0
0%
_
_
12
39%
0
0%
0
0%
48
19%
_
_
0
0%
41
25%
19
14%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
59
22%
60
20%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 328
All Students
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 240
LEVEL 1
15
6%
LEVEL 2
53
22%
LEVEL 3
94
39%
LEVEL 4
78
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 216
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
45
21%
LEVEL 3
91
42%
LEVEL 4
77
36%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
12
50%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
3
16%
LEVEL 4
13
68%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
White
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 203
LEVEL 1
14
7%
LEVEL 2
43
21%
LEVEL 3
87
43%
LEVEL 4
59
29%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
Female
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 115
LEVEL 1
3
3%
LEVEL 2
21
18%
LEVEL 3
42
37%
LEVEL 4
49
43%
Male
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 125
LEVEL 1
12
10%
LEVEL 2
32
26%
LEVEL 3
52
42%
LEVEL 4
29
23%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 240
LEVEL 1
15
6%
LEVEL 2
53
22%
LEVEL 3
94
39%
LEVEL 4
78
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
4
22%
LEVEL 2
6
33%
LEVEL 3
7
39%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 222
LEVEL 1
11
5%
LEVEL 2
47
21%
LEVEL 3
87
39%
LEVEL 4
77
35%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 240
LEVEL 1
15
6%
LEVEL 2
53
22%
LEVEL 3
94
39%
LEVEL 4
78
33%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
240
216
24
19
8
8
203
2
10
115
125
240
18
222
240
PROFICIENT
72%
78%
17%
84%
_%
38%
72%
_%
70%
79%
65%
72%
44%
74%
72%
LEVEL 1
15
6%
3
1%
12
50%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
14
7%
_
_
1
10%
3
3%
12
10%
15
6%
4
22%
11
5%
15
6%
LEVEL 2
53
22%
45
21%
8
33%
3
16%
_
_
5
63%
43
21%
_
_
2
20%
21
18%
32
26%
53
22%
6
33%
47
21%
53
22%
LEVEL 3
94
39%
91
42%
3
13%
3
16%
_
_
0
0%
87
43%
_
_
4
40%
42
37%
52
42%
94
39%
7
39%
87
39%
94
39%
LEVEL 4
78
33%
77
36%
1
4%
13
68%
_
_
3
38%
59
29%
_
_
3
30%
49
43%
29
23%
78
33%
1
6%
77
35%
78
33%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 336
All Students
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 247
LEVEL 1
13
5%
LEVEL 2
30
12%
LEVEL 3
80
32%
LEVEL 4
124
50%
General Education
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 234
LEVEL 1
8
3%
LEVEL 2
25
11%
LEVEL 3
77
33%
LEVEL 4
124
53%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
3
9%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
23
70%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
White
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 190
LEVEL 1
10
5%
LEVEL 2
21
11%
LEVEL 3
67
35%
LEVEL 4
92
48%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
4
67%
Female
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
8
6%
LEVEL 2
19
15%
LEVEL 3
42
33%
LEVEL 4
60
47%
Male
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 118
LEVEL 1
5
4%
LEVEL 2
11
9%
LEVEL 3
38
32%
LEVEL 4
64
54%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 243
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
8
27%
LEVEL 3
9
30%
LEVEL 4
8
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 217
LEVEL 1
8
4%
LEVEL 2
22
10%
LEVEL 3
71
33%
LEVEL 4
116
53%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 247
LEVEL 1
13
5%
LEVEL 2
30
12%
LEVEL 3
80
32%
LEVEL 4
124
50%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
247
234
13
33
8
10
190
6
129
118
243
4
30
217
247
PROFICIENT
83%
86%
23%
88%
63%
60%
84%
83%
79%
86%
_%
_%
57%
86%
83%
LEVEL 1
13
5%
8
3%
5
38%
1
3%
2
25%
0
0%
10
5%
0
0%
8
6%
5
4%
_
_
_
_
5
17%
8
4%
13
5%
LEVEL 2
30
12%
25
11%
5
38%
3
9%
1
13%
4
40%
21
11%
1
17%
19
15%
11
9%
_
_
_
_
8
27%
22
10%
30
12%
LEVEL 3
80
32%
77
33%
3
23%
6
18%
3
38%
3
30%
67
35%
1
17%
42
33%
38
32%
_
_
_
_
9
30%
71
33%
80
32%
LEVEL 4
124
50%
124
53%
0
0%
23
70%
2
25%
3
30%
92
48%
4
67%
60
47%
64
54%
_
_
_
_
8
27%
116
53%
124
50%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 333
All Students
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 267
LEVEL 1
15
6%
LEVEL 2
46
17%
LEVEL 3
87
33%
LEVEL 4
119
45%
General Education
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 242
LEVEL 1
5
2%
LEVEL 2
40
17%
LEVEL 3
81
33%
LEVEL 4
116
48%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
10
40%
LEVEL 2
6
24%
LEVEL 3
6
24%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
24
80%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 223
LEVEL 1
13
6%
LEVEL 2
40
18%
LEVEL 3
78
35%
LEVEL 4
92
41%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
3
38%
LEVEL 4
3
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123
LEVEL 1
8
7%
LEVEL 2
16
13%
LEVEL 3
45
37%
LEVEL 4
54
44%
Male
PROFICIENT
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 144
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
30
21%
LEVEL 3
42
29%
LEVEL 4
65
45%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 266
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
9
36%
LEVEL 3
5
20%
LEVEL 4
7
28%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 242
LEVEL 1
11
5%
LEVEL 2
37
15%
LEVEL 3
82
34%
LEVEL 4
112
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 267
LEVEL 1
15
6%
LEVEL 2
46
17%
LEVEL 3
87
33%
LEVEL 4
119
45%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
267
242
25
30
6
4
223
4
8
123
144
266
1
25
242
267
PROFICIENT
77%
81%
36%
90%
50%
_%
76%
_%
75%
80%
74%
_%
_%
48%
80%
77%
LEVEL 1
15
6%
5
2%
10
40%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
13
6%
_
_
1
13%
8
7%
7
5%
_
_
_
_
4
16%
11
5%
15
6%
LEVEL 2
46
17%
40
17%
6
24%
3
10%
2
33%
_
_
40
18%
_
_
1
13%
16
13%
30
21%
_
_
_
_
9
36%
37
15%
46
17%
LEVEL 3
87
33%
81
33%
6
24%
3
10%
3
50%
_
_
78
35%
_
_
3
38%
45
37%
42
29%
_
_
_
_
5
20%
82
34%
87
33%
LEVEL 4
119
45%
116
48%
3
12%
24
80%
0
0%
_
_
92
41%
_
_
3
38%
54
44%
65
45%
_
_
_
_
7
28%
112
46%
119
45%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 335
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
19
8%
LEVEL 2
34
14%
LEVEL 3
94
39%
LEVEL 4
92
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 225
LEVEL 1
9
4%
LEVEL 2
32
14%
LEVEL 3
92
41%
LEVEL 4
92
41%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
10
71%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
18
67%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
4
31%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 189
LEVEL 1
15
8%
LEVEL 2
27
14%
LEVEL 3
78
41%
LEVEL 4
69
37%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
30%
LEVEL 3
3
30%
LEVEL 4
4
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 113
LEVEL 1
6
5%
LEVEL 2
18
16%
LEVEL 3
45
40%
LEVEL 4
44
39%
Male
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
13
10%
LEVEL 2
16
13%
LEVEL 3
49
39%
LEVEL 4
48
38%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 236
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
6
29%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
8
38%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 218
LEVEL 1
13
6%
LEVEL 2
30
14%
LEVEL 3
86
39%
LEVEL 4
89
41%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 239
LEVEL 1
19
8%
LEVEL 2
34
14%
LEVEL 3
94
39%
LEVEL 4
92
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
239
225
14
27
13
7
189
3
10
113
126
236
3
21
218
239
PROFICIENT
78%
82%
14%
100%
38%
_%
78%
_%
70%
79%
77%
_%
_%
52%
80%
78%
LEVEL 1
19
8%
9
4%
10
71%
0
0%
4
31%
_
_
15
8%
_
_
0
0%
6
5%
13
10%
_
_
_
_
6
29%
13
6%
19
8%
LEVEL 2
34
14%
32
14%
2
14%
0
0%
4
31%
_
_
27
14%
_
_
3
30%
18
16%
16
13%
_
_
_
_
4
19%
30
14%
34
14%
LEVEL 3
94
39%
92
41%
2
14%
9
33%
4
31%
_
_
78
41%
_
_
3
30%
45
40%
49
39%
_
_
_
_
8
38%
86
39%
94
39%
LEVEL 4
92
38%
92
41%
0
0%
18
67%
1
8%
_
_
69
37%
_
_
4
40%
44
39%
48
38%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
89
41%
92
38%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 343
All Students
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 270
LEVEL 1
18
7%
LEVEL 2
28
10%
LEVEL 3
66
24%
LEVEL 4
158
59%
General Education
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 248
LEVEL 1
3
1%
LEVEL 2
25
10%
LEVEL 3
64
26%
LEVEL 4
156
63%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
15
68%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
2
9%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
21
75%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
White
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 230
LEVEL 1
15
7%
LEVEL 2
25
11%
LEVEL 3
56
24%
LEVEL 4
134
58%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
2
29%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Female
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 139
LEVEL 1
7
5%
LEVEL 2
12
9%
LEVEL 3
33
24%
LEVEL 4
87
63%
Male
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 131
LEVEL 1
11
8%
LEVEL 2
16
12%
LEVEL 3
33
25%
LEVEL 4
71
54%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 270
LEVEL 1
18
7%
LEVEL 2
28
10%
LEVEL 3
66
24%
LEVEL 4
158
59%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
5
22%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
7
30%
LEVEL 4
9
39%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 247
LEVEL 1
13
5%
LEVEL 2
26
11%
LEVEL 3
59
24%
LEVEL 4
149
60%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 270
LEVEL 1
18
7%
LEVEL 2
28
10%
LEVEL 3
66
24%
LEVEL 4
158
59%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
270
248
22
28
4
5
230
3
7
139
131
270
23
247
270
PROFICIENT
83%
89%
18%
96%
_%
60%
83%
_%
57%
86%
79%
83%
70%
84%
83%
LEVEL 1
18
7%
3
1%
15
68%
1
4%
_
_
0
0%
15
7%
_
_
2
29%
7
5%
11
8%
18
7%
5
22%
13
5%
18
7%
LEVEL 2
28
10%
25
10%
3
14%
0
0%
_
_
2
40%
25
11%
_
_
1
14%
12
9%
16
12%
28
10%
2
9%
26
11%
28
10%
LEVEL 3
66
24%
64
26%
2
9%
6
21%
_
_
2
40%
56
24%
_
_
2
29%
33
24%
33
25%
66
24%
7
30%
59
24%
66
24%
LEVEL 4
158
59%
156
63%
2
9%
21
75%
_
_
1
20%
134
58%
_
_
2
29%
87
63%
71
54%
158
59%
9
39%
149
60%
158
59%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 337
All Students
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 281
LEVEL 1
21
7%
LEVEL 2
45
16%
LEVEL 3
102
36%
LEVEL 4
113
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 259
LEVEL 1
10
4%
LEVEL 2
37
14%
LEVEL 3
101
39%
LEVEL 4
111
43%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
11
50%
LEVEL 2
8
36%
LEVEL 3
1
5%
LEVEL 4
2
9%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
25
81%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 235
LEVEL 1
19
8%
LEVEL 2
40
17%
LEVEL 3
89
38%
LEVEL 4
87
37%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Female
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
11
7%
LEVEL 2
24
16%
LEVEL 3
55
36%
LEVEL 4
61
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 130
LEVEL 1
10
8%
LEVEL 2
21
16%
LEVEL 3
47
36%
LEVEL 4
52
40%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 276
LEVEL 1
20
7%
LEVEL 2
45
16%
LEVEL 3
101
37%
LEVEL 4
110
40%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
3
60%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
8
28%
LEVEL 2
7
24%
LEVEL 3
10
34%
LEVEL 4
4
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 252
LEVEL 1
13
5%
LEVEL 2
38
15%
LEVEL 3
92
37%
LEVEL 4
109
43%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 281
LEVEL 1
21
7%
LEVEL 2
45
16%
LEVEL 3
102
36%
LEVEL 4
113
40%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
281
259
22
31
6
6
235
3
9
151
130
276
5
29
252
281
PROFICIENT
77%
82%
14%
97%
_%
67%
75%
_%
56%
77%
76%
76%
80%
48%
80%
77%
LEVEL 1
21
7%
10
4%
11
50%
1
3%
_
_
0
0%
19
8%
_
_
1
11%
11
7%
10
8%
20
7%
1
20%
8
28%
13
5%
21
7%
LEVEL 2
45
16%
37
14%
8
36%
0
0%
_
_
2
33%
40
17%
_
_
3
33%
24
16%
21
16%
45
16%
0
0%
7
24%
38
15%
45
16%
LEVEL 3
102
36%
101
39%
1
5%
5
16%
_
_
4
67%
89
38%
_
_
4
44%
55
36%
47
36%
101
37%
1
20%
10
34%
92
37%
102
36%
LEVEL 4
113
40%
111
43%
2
9%
25
81%
_
_
0
0%
87
37%
_
_
1
11%
61
40%
52
40%
110
40%
3
60%
4
14%
109
43%
113
40%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 319
All Students
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
11
14%
LEVEL 2
18
23%
LEVEL 3
38
49%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
15
23%
LEVEL 3
34
53%
LEVEL 4
11
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
7
50%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
10
14%
LEVEL 2
17
24%
LEVEL 3
35
49%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
6
17%
LEVEL 2
8
22%
LEVEL 3
17
47%
LEVEL 4
5
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42
LEVEL 1
5
12%
LEVEL 2
10
24%
LEVEL 3
21
50%
LEVEL 4
6
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
11
14%
LEVEL 2
18
23%
LEVEL 3
38
49%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
5
71%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 71
LEVEL 1
6
8%
LEVEL 2
17
24%
LEVEL 3
38
54%
LEVEL 4
10
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 78
LEVEL 1
11
14%
LEVEL 2
18
23%
LEVEL 3
38
49%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
78
64
14
2
1
3
72
6
36
42
78
7
71
78
PROFICIENT
63%
70%
29%
_%
_%
_%
63%
67%
61%
64%
63%
14%
68%
63%
LEVEL 1
11
14%
4
6%
7
50%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
14%
1
17%
6
17%
5
12%
11
14%
5
71%
6
8%
11
14%
LEVEL 2
18
23%
15
23%
3
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
24%
1
17%
8
22%
10
24%
18
23%
1
14%
17
24%
18
23%
LEVEL 3
38
49%
34
53%
4
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
35
49%
3
50%
17
47%
21
50%
38
49%
0
0%
38
54%
38
49%
LEVEL 4
11
14%
11
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
14%
1
17%
5
14%
6
14%
11
14%
1
14%
10
14%
11
14%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 156
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
7%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
145
93%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
156
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
156
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
7%
4 & ABOVE
145
93%
3 & ABOVE
156
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 90
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 279
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
4
1%
LEVEL 3
41
15%
LEVEL 4
233
84%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 252
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
32
13%
LEVEL 4
220
87%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
13
48%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
10%
LEVEL 4
26
90%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
4
57%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 234
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
3
1%
LEVEL 3
34
15%
LEVEL 4
196
84%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
7
78%
Female
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 129
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
15
12%
LEVEL 4
112
87%
Male
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 150
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
1%
LEVEL 3
26
17%
LEVEL 4
121
81%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 278
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
12
44%
LEVEL 4
14
52%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 252
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
3
1%
LEVEL 3
29
12%
LEVEL 4
219
87%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 279
LEVEL 1
1
0%
LEVEL 2
4
1%
LEVEL 3
41
15%
LEVEL 4
233
84%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
279
252
27
29
7
4
234
5
9
129
150
278
1
27
252
279
PROFICIENT
98%
100%
81%
100%
86%
_%
98%
_%
100%
98%
98%
_%
_%
96%
98%
98%
LEVEL 1
1
0%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
1
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
0%
1
0%
LEVEL 2
4
1%
0
0%
4
15%
0
0%
1
14%
_
_
3
1%
_
_
0
0%
2
2%
2
1%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
3
1%
4
1%
LEVEL 3
41
15%
32
13%
9
33%
3
10%
2
29%
_
_
34
15%
_
_
2
22%
15
12%
26
17%
_
_
_
_
12
44%
29
12%
41
15%
LEVEL 4
233
84%
220
87%
13
48%
26
90%
4
57%
_
_
196
84%
_
_
7
78%
112
87%
121
81%
_
_
_
_
14
52%
219
87%
233
84%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 84
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
49
32%
LEVEL 4
94
62%
General Education
PROFICIENT
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 126
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
1%
LEVEL 3
37
29%
LEVEL 4
88
70%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
6
24%
LEVEL 3
12
48%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
4
67%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
4
67%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
6
5%
LEVEL 3
40
30%
LEVEL 4
86
65%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 77
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
5%
LEVEL 3
24
31%
LEVEL 4
49
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 74
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
3
4%
LEVEL 3
25
34%
LEVEL 4
45
61%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
49
32%
LEVEL 4
94
62%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
5
28%
LEVEL 4
8
44%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 133
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
2
2%
LEVEL 3
44
33%
LEVEL 4
86
65%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
LEVEL 3
49
32%
LEVEL 4
94
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
151
126
25
6
6
5
133
1
6
77
74
151
18
133
151
PROFICIENT
95%
99%
72%
100%
83%
_%
95%
_%
100%
95%
95%
95%
72%
98%
95%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
1
1%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
0
0%
1
1%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
7
5%
1
1%
6
24%
0
0%
1
17%
_
_
6
5%
_
_
0
0%
4
5%
3
4%
7
5%
5
28%
2
2%
7
5%
LEVEL 3
49
32%
37
29%
12
48%
2
33%
1
17%
_
_
40
30%
_
_
6
100%
24
31%
25
34%
49
32%
5
28%
44
33%
49
32%
LEVEL 4
94
62%
88
70%
6
24%
4
67%
4
67%
_
_
86
65%
_
_
0
0%
49
64%
45
61%
94
62%
8
44%
86
65%
94
62%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 151
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
LEVEL 4
145
96%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
151
PROFICIENT
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
4%
LEVEL 4
145
96%
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2014 - 15)
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 5
Grade 7
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
3
3
2
GRADE
Grade 3
Grade 5
Grade 7
RECENTLY ARRIVED ELL STUDENTS NOT TAKING NYSESLAT IN LIEU OF NYSTP
3
3
2
Recently Arrived ELL Students (2014 - 15)
Recently Arrived ELL Students Taking NYSESLAT in Lieu of NYSTP
Grade 3
3
Grade 5
3
Grade 7
2
Recently Arrived ELL Students NOT Tested on the ELA NYSTP
Grade 3
3
Grade 5
3
Grade 7
2
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 Math
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Science
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 Math
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Science
Secondary-Level ELA
Secondary-Level Math
Secondary-Level Science
Secondary-Level Social Studies
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
40%
60%
60%
60%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
0
0
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
2
2
2
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
3
3
3
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0
0
0
Grade 3 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 3 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 4 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 7 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 8 Science
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Secondary-Level ELA
PROFICIENT
2 40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
3
LEVEL 3
2
LEVEL 4
0
Secondary-Level Math
PROFICIENT
3 60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
2
LEVEL 3
3
LEVEL 4
0
Secondary-Level Science
PROFICIENT
3 60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
2
LEVEL 3
3
LEVEL 4
0
Secondary-Level Social Studies
PROFICIENT
3 60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
LEVEL 2
2
LEVEL 3
3
LEVEL 4
0
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2014 - 15)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
7
7
ENTERING
0%
0%
EMERGING
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
29%
29%
EXPANDING
43%
43%
COMMANDING
29%
29%
Grade 1
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
6
6
ENTERING
17%
17%
EMERGING
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
17%
17%
EXPANDING
17%
17%
COMMANDING
50%
50%
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 3
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
4
4
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 4
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
3
3
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 7
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
ENTERING
0%
0%
EMERGING
0%
0%
TRANSITIONING
20%
20%
EXPANDING
40%
40%
COMMANDING
40%
40%
Grade 9
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 10
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
5
5
ENTERING
40%
40%
EMERGING
20%
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
20%
EXPANDING
0%
0%
COMMANDING
20%
20%
Grade 11
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Grade 12
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
29%
EXPANDING
43%
COMMANDING
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
29%
EXPANDING
43%
COMMANDING
29%
Grade 1
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
17%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
17%
COMMANDING
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
17%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
17%
COMMANDING
50%
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 3
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 4
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 3
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 7
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
40%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
40%
COMMANDING
40%
Grade 9
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 10
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
40%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
0%
COMMANDING
20%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
40%
EMERGING
20%
TRANSITIONING
20%
EXPANDING
0%
COMMANDING
20%
Grade 11
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 12
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
YES
YES
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
YES
YES
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,850*
1
112*
91*
348*
3,246*
27
422*
13
390*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
―
93%*
95%*
96%*
90%*
―
80%*
―
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,565
1
49
40
162
1,291
22
148✝
5
150
PI
147
―
108
120
170
147
―
65✝
―
100
EAMO
94
―
64
68
115
111
―
51
―
76
Safe Harbor Target
94
―
64
68
115
111
―
51
―
76
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,850*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,565
PI
147
EAMO
94
Safe Harbor Target
94
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
112*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
49
PI
108
EAMO
64
Safe Harbor Target
64
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
91*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
120
EAMO
68
Safe Harbor Target
68
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
348*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
162
PI
170
EAMO
115
Safe Harbor Target
115
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,246*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,291
PI
147
EAMO
111
Safe Harbor Target
111
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
422*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
148✝
PI
65✝
EAMO
51
Safe Harbor Target
51
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
390*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
150
PI
100
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
76
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,845*
3,738*
3,759*
3,502*
604*
3,802*
3,428*
3,831*
3,460*
1,947*
1,903*
0
3,850*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
90%*
90%*
90%*
95%*
90%*
92%*
90%*
91%*
90%*
91%*
―
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,564
1,516
1,525
1,403
274
1,543
1,431
1,560
1,415
783
782
0
1,565
PI
147
149
148
145
149
147
156
148
152
136
159
―
147
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,845*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,564
PI
147
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,738*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,516
PI
149
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,759*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,525
PI
148
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,502*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,403
PI
145
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
604*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
274
PI
149
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,802*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,543
PI
147
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,428*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
92%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,431
PI
156
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,831*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,560
PI
148
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,460*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,415
PI
152
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,947*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
783
PI
136
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,903*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
782
PI
159
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,850*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,565
PI
147
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
NO
NO
YES
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
NO
NO
YES
NO
―
NO
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,853*
1
112*
91*
348*
3,249*
27
423*
13
390*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
―
86%*
89%*
95%*
88%*
―
76%*
―
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,519
0
43
37
166
1,254
19
135✝
10
137
PI
175
―
133
157
193
174
―
96✝
―
136
EAMO
91
―
57
65
129
107
―
53
―
72
Safe Harbor Target
91
―
57
65
129
107
―
53
―
72
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,853*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,519
PI
175
EAMO
91
Safe Harbor Target
91
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
112*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
86%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43
PI
133
EAMO
57
Safe Harbor Target
57
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
91*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
157
EAMO
65
Safe Harbor Target
65
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
348*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
166
PI
193
EAMO
129
Safe Harbor Target
129
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,249*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,254
PI
174
EAMO
107
Safe Harbor Target
107
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
19
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
423*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
135✝
PI
96✝
EAMO
53
Safe Harbor Target
53
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
390*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
137
PI
136
EAMO
72
Safe Harbor Target
72
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,848*
3,741*
3,762*
3,505*
604*
3,805*
3,430*
3,834*
3,463*
1,949*
1,904*
0
3,853*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
89%*
89%*
88%*
91%*
89%*
90%*
89%*
90%*
88%*
89%*
―
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,519
1,476
1,482
1,353
265
1,500
1,398
1,509
1,382
755
764
0
1,519
PI
175
176
175
173
177
175
183
175
179
174
176
―
175
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,848*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,519
PI
175
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,741*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,476
PI
176
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,762*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,482
PI
175
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,505*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,353
PI
173
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
604*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
91%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
265
PI
177
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,805*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,500
PI
175
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,430*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,398
PI
183
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,834*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,509
PI
175
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,463*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
90%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,382
PI
179
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,949*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
755
PI
174
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1,904*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
764
PI
176
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3,853*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1,519
PI
175
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
623
0
18
13
53
532
7
75
1
64
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
―
―
―
96%
94%
―
83%
―
81%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
577
0
18
13
51
489
6
68✝
1
49
PI
197
―
―
―
200
197
―
179✝
―
188
EAMO
180
―
―
―
177
188
―
154
―
163
Progress Target
180
―
―
―
177
188
―
154
―
163
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
623
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
577
PI
197
EAMO
180
Progress Target
180
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
18
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
18
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
53
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
51
PI
200
EAMO
177
Progress Target
177
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
532
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
489
PI
197
EAMO
188
Progress Target
188
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
75
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68✝
PI
179✝
EAMO
154
Progress Target
154
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
64
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
49
PI
188
EAMO
163
Progress Target
163
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
623
605
610
570
91
616
548
622
559
327
296
0
623
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
94%
94%
94%
98%
94%
96%
94%
96%
93%
96%
―
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
577
559
564
526
88
571
515
576
528
302
275
0
577
PI
197
198
197
197
198
197
200
197
198
197
198
―
197
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
623
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
577
PI
197
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
605
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
559
PI
198
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
610
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
564
PI
197
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
570
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
526
PI
197
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
91
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
88
PI
198
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
616
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
571
PI
197
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
548
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
515
PI
200
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
622
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
576
PI
197
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
559
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
528
PI
198
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
327
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
93%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
302
PI
197
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
296
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
275
PI
198
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
623
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
94%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
577
PI
197
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
336
2
17
7
20
288
2
23
3
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
336
3
15
7
20
289
2
28
1
40
PI
193
―
―
―
―
193
―
―
―
178
EAMO
164
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
142
Safe Harbor Target
164
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
142
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
336
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
336
PI
193
EAMO
164
Safe Harbor Target
164
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
17
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
20
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
288
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
289
PI
193
EAMO
175
Safe Harbor Target
175
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
23
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
40
PI
178
EAMO
142
Safe Harbor Target
142
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
334
319
329
316
48
334
313
333
296
182
154
0
336
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
333
321
329
316
47
334
308
335
296
184
152
0
336
PI
193
193
192
192
187
193
198
193
195
190
195
―
193
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
334
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
333
PI
193
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
319
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
321
PI
193
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
329
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
329
PI
192
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
316
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
316
PI
192
Not White
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
187
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
334
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
334
PI
193
General Education
12th Graders
313
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
308
PI
198
English Proficient
12th Graders
333
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
335
PI
193
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
296
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
296
PI
195
Male
12th Graders
182
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
184
PI
190
Female
12th Graders
154
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
152
PI
195
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
336
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
336
PI
193
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
12th graders
336
2
17
7
20
288
2
23
3
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
336
3
15
7
20
289
2
28
1
40
PI
181
―
―
―
―
182
―
―
―
148
EAMO
148
―
―
―
―
160
―
―
―
123
Safe Harbor Target
148
―
―
―
―
160
―
―
―
123
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
336
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
336
PI
181
EAMO
148
Safe Harbor Target
148
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
17
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
7
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
20
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
20
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
288
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
289
PI
182
EAMO
160
Safe Harbor Target
160
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
23
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
40
PI
148
EAMO
123
Safe Harbor Target
123
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
334
319
329
316
48
334
313
333
296
182
154
0
336
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
333
321
329
316
47
334
308
335
296
184
152
0
336
PI
182
183
181
180
174
181
187
181
186
177
186
―
181
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
334
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
333
PI
182
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
319
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
321
PI
183
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
329
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
329
PI
181
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
316
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
316
PI
180
Not White
12th Graders
48
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
47
PI
174
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
334
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
334
PI
181
General Education
12th Graders
313
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
308
PI
187
English Proficient
12th Graders
333
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
335
PI
181
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
296
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
296
PI
186
Male
12th Graders
182
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
184
PI
177
Female
12th Graders
154
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
152
PI
186
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
336
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
336
PI
181
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
147
―
108
120
170
147
―
65
―
100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
175
―
133
157
193
174
―
96
―
136
Secondary-Level ELA PI
193
―
―
―
―
193
―
―
―
178
Secondary-Level MATH PI
181
―
―
―
―
182
―
―
―
148
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
174
0
121
139
182
174
0
81
0
141
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
147
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
175
Secondary-Level ELA PI
193
Secondary-Level MATH PI
181
Unweighted Combined PI
174
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
108
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
133
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
121
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
120
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
157
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
139
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
170
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
193
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
182
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
147
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
174
Secondary-Level ELA PI
193
Secondary-Level MATH PI
182
Unweighted Combined PI
174
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
65
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
96
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
81
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
100
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
136
Secondary-Level ELA PI
178
Secondary-Level MATH PI
148
Unweighted Combined PI
141
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
YES
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
437
0
12
12
32
379
2
28
4
48
Graduation Rate
98%
―
―
―
100%
98%
―
―
―
92%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
77%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
437
Graduation Rate
98%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
379
Graduation Rate
98%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
28
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
48
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
77%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
370
3
11
9
34
312
1
28
3
25
Graduation Rate
96%
―
―
―
97%
96%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
80%
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
370
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
9
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
97%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
312
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
28
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
25
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
437
425
425
405
58
435
409
433
389
214
223
0
437
Graduation Rate
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
99%
99%
98%
99%
99%
98%
―
98%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
367
359
361
336
58
369
342
367
345
172
198
0
370
Graduation Rate
96%
96%
96%
96%
97%
96%
99%
96%
97%
95%
96%
―
96%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
437
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
425
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
425
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
405
Graduation Rate
98%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
435
Graduation Rate
99%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
409
Graduation Rate
99%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
433
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
389
Graduation Rate
99%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
214
Graduation Rate
99%
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
223
Graduation Rate
98%
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
437
Graduation Rate
98%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
367
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
359
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
361
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
336
Graduation Rate
96%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
58
Graduation Rate
97%
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
369
Graduation Rate
96%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
342
Graduation Rate
99%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
367
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
345
Graduation Rate
97%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
172
Graduation Rate
95%
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
198
Graduation Rate
96%
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
370
Graduation Rate
96%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
75%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
75%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
1%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
4%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This District)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
