GENESEE COMMUNITY CS - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
6%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
6%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
1
0
2
0
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
1
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
2
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
19
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
11%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
11%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
11%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
11%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
18
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
11%
Total Number of Classes
19
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
11%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 19
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
11%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
11%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
11%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
11%
Total Number of Core Classes
18
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
11%
Total Number of Classes
19
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
11%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 296
All Students
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
9
32%
LEVEL 2
13
46%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
3
16%
LEVEL 2
10
53%
LEVEL 3
6
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
6
67%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
5
31%
LEVEL 2
6
38%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
7
58%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
9
32%
LEVEL 2
13
46%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
4
24%
LEVEL 2
9
53%
LEVEL 3
4
24%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
9
32%
LEVEL 2
13
46%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
28
26
2
3
4
19
2
9
16
12
28
11
17
28
PROFICIENT
21%
_%
_%
_%
_%
32%
_%
0%
31%
8%
21%
18%
24%
21%
LEVEL 1
9
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
16%
_
_
6
67%
5
31%
4
33%
9
32%
5
45%
4
24%
9
32%
LEVEL 2
13
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
53%
_
_
3
33%
6
38%
7
58%
13
46%
4
36%
9
53%
13
46%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
32%
_
_
0
0%
5
31%
1
8%
6
21%
2
18%
4
24%
6
21%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 297
All Students
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
9
41%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
2
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
6
50%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
9
41%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
6
38%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
9
41%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
22
21
1
8
3
11
11
10
12
22
6
16
22
PROFICIENT
32%
_%
_%
_%
_%
45%
18%
20%
42%
32%
17%
38%
32%
LEVEL 1
9
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
36%
5
45%
3
30%
6
50%
9
41%
3
50%
6
38%
9
41%
LEVEL 2
6
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
18%
4
36%
5
50%
1
8%
6
27%
2
33%
4
25%
6
27%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
18%
2
18%
0
0%
4
33%
4
18%
1
17%
3
19%
4
18%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
27%
0
0%
2
20%
1
8%
3
14%
0
0%
3
19%
3
14%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 327
All Students
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
Female
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
19
2
2
18
1
21
9
12
21
4
17
21
PROFICIENT
67%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
67%
67%
67%
67%
_%
_%
67%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
33%
3
33%
4
33%
7
33%
_
_
_
_
7
33%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
43%
4
44%
5
42%
9
43%
_
_
_
_
9
43%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
24%
2
22%
3
25%
5
24%
_
_
_
_
5
24%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 317
All Students
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
10
48%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
10
67%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
9
64%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
4
57%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
10
48%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
10
48%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
20
1
3
1
15
2
6
14
7
21
4
17
21
PROFICIENT
57%
_%
_%
_%
_%
80%
_%
0%
64%
43%
57%
_%
_%
57%
LEVEL 1
5
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
7%
_
_
4
67%
1
7%
4
57%
5
24%
_
_
_
_
5
24%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
13%
_
_
2
33%
4
29%
0
0%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
4
19%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
13%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
2
29%
2
10%
_
_
_
_
2
10%
LEVEL 4
10
48%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
67%
_
_
0
0%
9
64%
1
14%
10
48%
_
_
_
_
10
48%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 304
All Students
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
4
22%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
7
39%
LEVEL 4
3
17%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
4
25%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
9
33%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
25
2
3
4
18
2
9
15
12
27
11
16
27
PROFICIENT
41%
_%
_%
_%
_%
56%
_%
11%
40%
42%
41%
36%
44%
41%
LEVEL 1
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
22%
_
_
5
56%
6
40%
3
25%
9
33%
5
45%
4
25%
9
33%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
22%
_
_
3
33%
3
20%
4
33%
7
26%
2
18%
5
31%
7
26%
LEVEL 3
8
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
39%
_
_
1
11%
4
27%
4
33%
8
30%
3
27%
5
31%
8
30%
LEVEL 4
3
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
17%
_
_
0
0%
2
13%
1
8%
3
11%
1
9%
2
13%
3
11%
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 306
All Students
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
5
36%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
19
1
8
3
9
11
9
11
20
6
14
20
PROFICIENT
45%
_%
_%
_%
_%
78%
18%
44%
45%
45%
33%
50%
45%
LEVEL 1
5
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
11%
4
36%
1
11%
4
36%
5
25%
2
33%
3
21%
5
25%
LEVEL 2
6
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
11%
5
45%
4
44%
2
18%
6
30%
2
33%
4
29%
6
30%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
56%
1
9%
3
33%
3
27%
6
30%
1
17%
5
36%
6
30%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
22%
1
9%
1
11%
2
18%
3
15%
1
17%
2
14%
3
15%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 349
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
11
52%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
11
52%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
1
11%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
8
67%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
11
52%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
LEVEL 4
11
52%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
19
2
2
18
1
21
9
12
21
4
17
21
PROFICIENT
95%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
95%
89%
100%
95%
_%
_%
95%
LEVEL 1
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
5%
1
11%
0
0%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
43%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
43%
5
56%
4
33%
9
43%
_
_
_
_
9
43%
LEVEL 4
11
52%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
52%
3
33%
8
67%
11
52%
_
_
_
_
11
52%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 318
All Students
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
5
24%
LEVEL 3
6
29%
LEVEL 4
7
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
6
40%
LEVEL 4
7
47%
Multiracial
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
6
43%
Male
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
3
43%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
1
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
5
24%
LEVEL 3
6
29%
LEVEL 4
7
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
5
24%
LEVEL 3
6
29%
LEVEL 4
7
33%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
19
2
3
1
15
2
6
14
7
21
4
17
21
PROFICIENT
62%
_%
_%
_%
_%
87%
_%
0%
64%
57%
62%
_%
_%
62%
LEVEL 1
3
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
3
50%
0
0%
3
43%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
LEVEL 2
5
24%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
13%
_
_
3
50%
5
36%
0
0%
5
24%
_
_
_
_
5
24%
LEVEL 3
6
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
40%
_
_
0
0%
3
21%
3
43%
6
29%
_
_
_
_
6
29%
LEVEL 4
7
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
47%
_
_
0
0%
6
43%
1
14%
7
33%
_
_
_
_
7
33%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 84
All Students
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
12
60%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
7
78%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
18%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
5
45%
Female
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
11%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
5
56%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
7
64%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
12
60%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
3
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
14%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
9
64%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
12
60%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
19
1
8
3
9
11
9
11
20
6
14
20
PROFICIENT
90%
_%
_%
_%
_%
100%
82%
89%
91%
90%
100%
86%
90%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
2
18%
1
11%
1
9%
2
10%
0
0%
2
14%
2
10%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
22%
4
36%
3
33%
3
27%
6
30%
3
50%
3
21%
6
30%
LEVEL 4
12
60%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
78%
5
45%
5
56%
7
64%
12
60%
3
50%
9
64%
12
60%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
241*
0
19
12
1
166*
8
12
2
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
―
―
―
―
88%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
0
14
10
0
63
5
6
0
25
PI
117
―
―
―
―
143
―
―
―
―
EAMO
87
―
―
―
―
102
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
87
―
―
―
―
102
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
241*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
PI
117
EAMO
87
Safe Harbor Target
87
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
166*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
63
PI
143
EAMO
102
Safe Harbor Target
102
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
241*
200*
220*
240*
40
229*
219*
239*
179*
115*
126*
0
241*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
87%*
87%*
88%*
73%
88%*
89%*
88%*
88%*
88%*
87%*
―
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
78
82
92
29
87
86
92
67
43
49
0
92
PI
117
128
126
117
―
118
121
117
127
107
127
―
117
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
241*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
PI
117
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
200*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
78
PI
128
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
220*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
82
PI
126
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
240*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
PI
117
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
73%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
29
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
229*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
87
PI
118
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
219*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
89%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
86
PI
121
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
239*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
PI
117
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
179*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
67
PI
127
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
115*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
88%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43
PI
107
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
126*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
49
PI
127
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
241*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
92
PI
117
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
242*
0
19
12
1
167*
8
12
2
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
―
―
―
―
84%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
0
14
10
0
60
5
7
0
25
PI
139
―
―
―
―
172
―
―
―
―
EAMO
83
―
―
―
―
98
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
83
―
―
―
―
98
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
242*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
139
EAMO
83
Safe Harbor Target
83
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
167*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
172
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
98
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
8
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
242*
201*
221*
241*
40
230*
220*
240*
180*
115*
127*
0
242*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
84%*
84%*
85%*
73%
85%*
85%*
85%*
85%*
85%*
84%*
―
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
75
79
89
29
84
82
89
64
42
47
0
89
PI
139
152
147
139
―
144
139
139
152
138
140
―
139
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
242*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
139
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
201*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
75
PI
152
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
221*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
79
PI
147
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
241*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
139
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
73%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
29
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
230*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
84
PI
144
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
220*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
82
PI
139
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
240*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
139
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
180*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64
PI
152
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
115*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
42
PI
138
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
127*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47
PI
140
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
242*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
89
PI
139
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
0
10
3
1
15
0
1
2
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
0
10
7
0
31**
2
3
0
12
PI
196**
―
―
―
―
200**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
172
―
―
―
―
176
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
172
―
―
―
―
1
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
PI
196**
EAMO
172
Progress Target
172
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
3
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
31**
PI
200**
EAMO
176
Progress Target
1
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
19
26
28
14
29
28
27
19
14
15
0
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
40**
43**
50**
19
48**
47**
50**
38**
28
22
0
50**
PI
196**
198**
198**
196**
―
196**
196**
196**
195**
―
―
―
196**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
PI
196**
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40**
PI
198**
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43**
PI
198**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
28
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
PI
196**
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
19
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
48**
PI
196**
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
28
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47**
PI
196**
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
27
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
PI
196**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38**
PI
195**
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
29
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
PI
196**
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. **The number of tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test period in the school/district in the current year is less than 30, so the numbers in the current year and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
117
―
―
―
―
143
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
139
―
―
―
―
172
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
128
0
0
0
0
158
0
0
0
0
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
117
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
139
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
128
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
143
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
172
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
158
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
