The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
13%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
0%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
13%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
2
0
8
12
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
2
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
8
Paraprofessionals
12
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
44
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
9%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
2%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
30%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
102
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
1%
Total Number of Classes
179
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
6%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 44
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
9%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
2%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
30%
Total Number of Core Classes
102
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This District
1%
Total Number of Classes
179
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
6%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
39
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
18
46%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
Regents Diploma
39
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
18
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
39
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
18
46%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
Regents Diploma
39
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
18
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
39
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
18
46%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
1
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
40
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
39
Regents Diploma
39
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
18
46%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
1
3%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
19
48%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
33%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
15%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
19
48%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
19
48%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
33%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
15%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
19
48%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
19
48%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
33%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
6
15%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
1
3%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
19
48%
To Two-Year College
13
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
1
3%
To Employment
6
15%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
1
3%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
11
44%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
11
44%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
9
50%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
11
44%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
3
18%
LEVEL 3
10
59%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
21
4
1
1
23
25
18
7
25
8
17
1
24
PROFICIENT
52%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
52%
61%
29%
52%
13%
71%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
4
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
16%
3
17%
1
14%
4
16%
2
25%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
8
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
32%
4
22%
4
57%
8
32%
5
63%
3
18%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
11
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
44%
9
50%
2
29%
11
44%
1
13%
10
59%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
8%
2
11%
0
0%
2
8%
0
0%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 287
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
4
80%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
19
14
5
1
18
19
9
10
19
6
13
19
PROFICIENT
26%
36%
0%
_%
_%
26%
33%
20%
26%
17%
31%
26%
LEVEL 1
7
37%
3
21%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
7
37%
4
44%
3
30%
7
37%
2
33%
5
38%
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
6
43%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
7
37%
2
22%
5
50%
7
37%
3
50%
4
31%
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
4
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
21%
3
33%
1
10%
4
21%
1
17%
3
23%
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
1
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
1
10%
1
5%
0
0%
1
8%
1
5%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
5
29%
LEVEL 2
7
41%
LEVEL 3
3
18%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
9
43%
LEVEL 3
8
38%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
29
2
1
30
31
17
14
31
10
21
31
PROFICIENT
35%
_%
_%
_%
_%
35%
29%
43%
35%
10%
48%
35%
LEVEL 1
7
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
23%
5
29%
2
14%
7
23%
5
50%
2
10%
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
42%
7
41%
6
43%
13
42%
4
40%
9
43%
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
29%
3
18%
6
43%
9
29%
1
10%
8
38%
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
2
12%
0
0%
2
6%
0
0%
2
10%
2
6%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
5
22%
LEVEL 4
6
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Female
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
5
33%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
4
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
10
50%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
6
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
29
23
6
1
28
29
15
14
29
9
20
29
PROFICIENT
38%
48%
0%
_%
_%
38%
47%
29%
38%
11%
50%
38%
LEVEL 1
5
17%
1
4%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
5
17%
1
7%
4
29%
5
17%
5
56%
0
0%
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
11
48%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
13
45%
7
47%
6
43%
13
45%
3
33%
10
50%
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
5
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
17%
5
33%
0
0%
5
17%
1
11%
4
20%
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
6
26%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
21%
2
13%
4
29%
6
21%
0
0%
6
30%
6
21%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 292
All Students
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
6
33%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
6
33%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
1
17%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
6
50%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
6
33%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
3
23%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
6
33%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
15
3
18
6
12
18
5
13
18
PROFICIENT
22%
_%
_%
22%
50%
8%
22%
0%
31%
22%
LEVEL 1
6
33%
_
_
_
_
6
33%
1
17%
5
42%
6
33%
3
60%
3
23%
6
33%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
_
_
_
_
8
44%
2
33%
6
50%
8
44%
2
40%
6
46%
8
44%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
_
_
_
_
4
22%
3
50%
1
8%
4
22%
0
0%
4
31%
4
22%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 273
All Students
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
6
86%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
13
9
4
13
13
13
7
6
13
PROFICIENT
8%
_%
_%
8%
8%
8%
14%
0%
8%
LEVEL 1
8
62%
_
_
_
_
8
62%
8
62%
8
62%
6
86%
2
33%
8
62%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
_
_
_
_
4
31%
4
31%
4
31%
0
0%
4
67%
4
31%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
1
8%
1
8%
1
14%
0
0%
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 329
All Students
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
6
33%
LEVEL 4
8
44%
Male
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
6
35%
LEVEL 4
9
53%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
21
4
1
1
23
25
18
7
25
8
17
1
24
PROFICIENT
72%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
72%
78%
57%
72%
38%
88%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
8%
1
6%
1
14%
2
8%
1
13%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
5
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
20%
3
17%
2
29%
5
20%
4
50%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
8
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
32%
6
33%
2
29%
8
32%
2
25%
6
35%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
10
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
40%
8
44%
2
29%
10
40%
1
13%
9
53%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 283
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
14
4
1
17
18
9
9
18
6
12
18
PROFICIENT
28%
_%
_%
_%
_%
28%
11%
44%
28%
0%
42%
28%
LEVEL 1
8
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
44%
5
56%
3
33%
8
44%
4
67%
4
33%
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
28%
3
33%
2
22%
5
28%
2
33%
3
25%
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
22%
1
11%
3
33%
4
22%
0
0%
4
33%
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
1
11%
1
6%
0
0%
1
8%
1
6%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 333
All Students
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
7
58%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
7
37%
LEVEL 4
9
47%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
26
1
1
26
27
15
12
27
8
19
27
PROFICIENT
67%
_%
_%
_%
_%
67%
40%
100%
67%
25%
84%
67%
LEVEL 1
2
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
7%
2
13%
0
0%
2
7%
2
25%
0
0%
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
26%
7
47%
0
0%
7
26%
4
50%
3
16%
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
33%
4
27%
5
42%
9
33%
2
25%
7
37%
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
33%
2
13%
7
58%
9
33%
0
0%
9
47%
9
33%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 339
All Students
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
Female
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
8
57%
Male
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
6
50%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
12
63%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
22
4
1
25
26
14
12
26
7
19
26
PROFICIENT
81%
_%
_%
_%
_%
81%
79%
83%
81%
71%
84%
81%
LEVEL 1
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
8%
1
4%
1
14%
0
0%
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
15%
3
21%
1
8%
4
15%
1
14%
3
16%
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
27%
3
21%
4
33%
7
27%
3
43%
4
21%
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
54%
8
57%
6
50%
14
54%
2
29%
12
63%
14
54%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 311
All Students
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
7
64%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
16
14
2
16
5
11
16
4
12
16
PROFICIENT
31%
_%
_%
31%
40%
27%
31%
_%
_%
31%
LEVEL 1
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
1
20%
1
9%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
LEVEL 2
9
56%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
2
40%
7
64%
9
56%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
LEVEL 3
5
31%
_
_
_
_
5
31%
2
40%
3
27%
5
31%
_
_
_
_
5
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 291
All Students
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
5
4
9
9
9
4
5
9
PROFICIENT
0%
_%
_%
0%
0%
0%
_%
_%
0%
LEVEL 1
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
3
33%
3
33%
_
_
_
_
3
33%
LEVEL 2
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
6
67%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
6
100%
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
6
100%
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
4 & ABOVE
6
100%
3 & ABOVE
6
100%
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 82
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
55%
LEVEL 4
9
45%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
8
67%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
7
54%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
8
42%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
20
5
1
24
25
12
13
25
6
19
25
PROFICIENT
96%
100%
80%
_%
_%
96%
92%
100%
96%
100%
95%
96%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
0
0%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
8%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
5%
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
11
55%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
14
56%
8
67%
6
46%
14
56%
4
67%
10
53%
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
9
45%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
10
40%
3
25%
7
54%
10
40%
2
33%
8
42%
10
40%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 68
All Students
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
2
33%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
16
12
4
16
3
13
16
6
10
16
PROFICIENT
69%
_%
_%
69%
_%
_%
69%
67%
70%
69%
LEVEL 1
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
_
_
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
1
10%
1
6%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
_
_
_
_
4
25%
_
_
_
_
4
25%
2
33%
2
20%
4
25%
LEVEL 3
9
56%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
_
_
_
_
9
56%
2
33%
7
70%
9
56%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
13%
2
33%
0
0%
2
13%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
18
69%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
7
47%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
62%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
22
79%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
38
3
1
2
38
41
26
15
40
1
13
28
41
PROFICIENT
95%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
95%
92%
100%
_%
_%
85%
100%
95%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
34%
6
23%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
8
62%
6
21%
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
61%
18
69%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
22
79%
25
61%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
51%
LEVEL 4
18
44%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
51%
LEVEL 4
18
44%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
35%
LEVEL 4
15
58%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
80%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
69%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
43%
LEVEL 4
16
57%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
51%
LEVEL 4
18
44%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
38
3
1
2
38
41
26
15
40
1
13
28
41
PROFICIENT
95%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
95%
92%
100%
_%
_%
85%
100%
95%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
8%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
21
51%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
21
51%
9
35%
12
80%
_
_
_
_
9
69%
12
43%
21
51%
LEVEL 4
18
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
44%
15
58%
3
20%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
16
57%
18
44%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
23%
LEVEL 4
18
69%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
7
47%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
62%
LEVEL 4
3
23%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
21%
LEVEL 4
22
79%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
38
3
1
2
38
41
26
15
40
1
13
28
41
PROFICIENT
95%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
95%
92%
100%
_%
_%
85%
100%
95%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
34%
6
23%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
8
62%
6
21%
14
34%
LEVEL 4
25
61%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
61%
18
69%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
3
23%
22
79%
25
61%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
36
88%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
36
88%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
23
88%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
13%
LEVEL 4
13
87%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
9
69%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
27
96%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
LEVEL 4
36
88%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
38
3
1
2
38
41
26
15
40
1
13
28
41
PROFICIENT
95%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
95%
92%
100%
_%
_%
85%
100%
95%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
7%
1
4%
2
13%
_
_
_
_
2
15%
1
4%
3
7%
LEVEL 4
36
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
36
88%
23
88%
13
87%
_
_
_
_
9
69%
27
96%
36
88%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
27%
LEVEL 4
28
68%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
27%
LEVEL 4
28
68%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
15%
LEVEL 4
20
77%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
8
53%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
5
38%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
18%
LEVEL 4
23
82%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
27%
LEVEL 4
28
68%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
41
38
3
1
2
38
41
26
15
40
1
13
28
41
PROFICIENT
95%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
95%
92%
100%
_%
_%
85%
100%
95%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
27%
4
15%
7
47%
_
_
_
_
6
46%
5
18%
11
27%
LEVEL 4
28
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
28
68%
20
77%
8
53%
_
_
_
_
5
38%
23
82%
28
68%
Regents Examination Results (2014 - 15)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
34
6
1
2
37
40
21
19
39
1
11
29
40
55
38
95%
34
100%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
95%
20
95%
18
95%
_
_
_
_
9
82%
29
100%
38
95%
65
38
95%
34
100%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
95%
20
95%
18
95%
_
_
_
_
9
82%
29
100%
38
95%
85
23
58%
22
65%
1
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
58%
12
57%
11
58%
_
_
_
_
3
27%
20
69%
23
58%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
95%
65
38
95%
85
23
58%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
100%
65
34
100%
85
22
65%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
67%
65
4
67%
85
1
17%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
95%
65
38
95%
85
23
58%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
20
95%
85
12
57%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
18
95%
65
18
95%
85
11
58%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
82%
65
9
82%
85
3
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
29
100%
85
20
69%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
95%
65
38
95%
85
23
58%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 5
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
American Indian or Alaska Native
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
15
12
3
1
14
15
11
4
15
7
8
15
55
15
100%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
100%
_
_
_
_
15
100%
7
100%
8
100%
15
100%
65
12
80%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
80%
_
_
_
_
12
80%
5
71%
7
88%
12
80%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
12
80%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
12
80%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
12
80%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
5
71%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
7
88%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
12
80%
85
0
0%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
42
41
1
2
40
42
22
20
41
1
5
37
42
55
39
93%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
39
93%
20
91%
19
95%
_
_
_
_
3
60%
36
97%
39
93%
65
32
76%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
76%
17
77%
15
75%
_
_
_
_
2
40%
30
81%
32
76%
85
4
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
10%
3
14%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
4
11%
4
10%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
93%
65
32
76%
85
4
10%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
93%
65
32
76%
85
4
10%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
91%
65
17
77%
85
3
14%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
19
95%
65
15
75%
85
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
60%
65
2
40%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
97%
65
30
81%
85
4
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
93%
65
32
76%
85
4
10%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
23
23
23
17
6
23
3
20
23
55
8
35%
8
35%
8
35%
7
41%
1
17%
8
35%
_
_
_
_
8
35%
65
4
17%
4
17%
4
17%
4
24%
0
0%
4
17%
_
_
_
_
4
17%
85
1
4%
1
4%
1
4%
1
6%
0
0%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
41%
65
4
24%
85
1
6%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
1
17%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
35%
65
4
17%
85
1
4%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
34
3
1
36
37
19
18
37
10
27
37
LEVEL 1
4
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
11%
2
11%
2
11%
4
11%
3
30%
1
4%
4
11%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
16%
4
21%
2
11%
6
16%
2
20%
4
15%
6
16%
LEVEL 3
15
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
41%
10
53%
5
28%
15
41%
4
40%
11
41%
15
41%
LEVEL 4
10
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
27%
3
16%
7
39%
10
27%
0
0%
10
37%
10
27%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
0
0%
2
11%
2
5%
1
10%
1
4%
2
5%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
15
41%
LEVEL 4
10
27%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
15
41%
LEVEL 4
10
27%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
4
21%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
3
16%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
2
11%
LEVEL 3
5
28%
LEVEL 4
7
39%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
15
41%
LEVEL 4
10
27%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
10%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
11
41%
LEVEL 4
10
37%
LEVEL 5
1
4%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
6
16%
LEVEL 3
15
41%
LEVEL 4
10
27%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
38
38
2
36
38
19
19
37
1
4
34
38
LEVEL 1
1
3%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
5%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
10
26%
_
_
_
_
10
26%
7
37%
3
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
23
61%
_
_
_
_
23
61%
10
53%
13
68%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
5%
1
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
2
5%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
0
0%
2
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
13
68%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
2
11%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
23
61%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
LEVEL 5
2
5%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
43
39
4
1
42
43
27
16
43
9
34
43
55
42
98%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
42
98%
27
100%
15
94%
42
98%
8
89%
34
100%
42
98%
65
40
93%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
40
93%
25
93%
15
94%
40
93%
7
78%
33
97%
40
93%
85
31
72%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
31
72%
16
59%
15
94%
31
72%
2
22%
29
85%
31
72%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
40
93%
85
31
72%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 42
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
40
93%
85
31
72%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
25
93%
85
16
59%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
94%
65
15
94%
85
15
94%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
40
93%
85
31
72%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
89%
65
7
78%
85
2
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
100%
65
33
97%
85
29
85%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
42
98%
65
40
93%
85
31
72%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
2
35
37
20
17
36
1
8
29
37
55
37
100%
32
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
37
100%
20
100%
17
100%
_
_
_
_
8
100%
29
100%
37
100%
65
37
100%
32
100%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
37
100%
20
100%
17
100%
_
_
_
_
8
100%
29
100%
37
100%
85
27
73%
25
78%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
27
73%
16
80%
11
65%
_
_
_
_
4
50%
23
79%
27
73%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
37
100%
85
27
73%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
25
78%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
100%
65
5
100%
85
2
40%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
37
100%
85
27
73%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
100%
65
20
100%
85
16
80%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
17
100%
85
11
65%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
4
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
100%
65
29
100%
85
23
79%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
37
100%
65
37
100%
85
27
73%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
40
37
3
40
25
15
40
8
32
40
55
40
100%
_
_
_
_
40
100%
25
100%
15
100%
40
100%
8
100%
32
100%
40
100%
65
40
100%
_
_
_
_
40
100%
25
100%
15
100%
40
100%
8
100%
32
100%
40
100%
85
22
55%
_
_
_
_
22
55%
9
36%
13
87%
22
55%
0
0%
22
69%
22
55%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
40
100%
85
22
55%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
40
100%
85
22
55%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
25
100%
85
9
36%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
15
100%
85
13
87%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
40
100%
85
22
55%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
8
100%
85
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
22
69%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
40
100%
65
40
100%
85
22
55%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
35
30
5
2
33
35
17
18
35
7
28
35
55
33
94%
29
97%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
33
94%
16
94%
17
94%
33
94%
5
71%
28
100%
33
94%
65
32
91%
29
97%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
32
91%
16
94%
16
89%
32
91%
4
57%
28
100%
32
91%
85
15
43%
15
50%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
15
43%
7
41%
8
44%
15
43%
1
14%
14
50%
15
43%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
29
97%
85
15
50%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
3
60%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
16
94%
85
7
41%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
16
89%
85
8
44%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
4
57%
85
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
100%
65
28
100%
85
14
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
94%
65
32
91%
85
15
43%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
21
1
20
21
14
7
21
3
18
21
55
20
95%
20
95%
_
_
_
_
20
95%
14
100%
6
86%
20
95%
_
_
_
_
20
95%
65
18
86%
18
86%
_
_
_
_
18
86%
12
86%
6
86%
18
86%
_
_
_
_
18
86%
85
3
14%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
0
0%
3
43%
3
14%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
100%
65
12
86%
85
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
6
86%
85
3
43%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
20
95%
65
18
86%
85
3
14%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
9
9
2
7
9
8
1
9
9
9
55
6
67%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
6
67%
6
67%
65
6
67%
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
_
_
_
_
6
67%
6
67%
6
67%
85
1
11%
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
_
_
_
_
1
11%
1
11%
1
11%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
67%
65
6
67%
85
1
11%
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
409*
0
2
2
1
401*
0
36
0
115*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
―
―
―
―
69%*
―
―
―
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
0
2
2
1
126
0
22
0
44
PI
108
―
―
―
―
109
―
―
―
59
EAMO
88
―
―
―
―
105
―
―
―
69
Safe Harbor Target
88
―
―
―
―
105
―
―
―
69
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
409*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
PI
108
EAMO
88
Safe Harbor Target
88
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
401*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
126
PI
109
EAMO
105
Safe Harbor Target
105
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
36
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
115*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
76%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
44
PI
59
EAMO
69
Safe Harbor Target
69
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
409*
405*
406*
408*
5
409*
346*
409*
294*
233*
176*
1
408*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
69%*
69%*
69%*
―
69%*
69%*
69%*
66%*
69%*
69%*
―
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
129
129
130
5
131
109
131
87
67
64
1
130
PI
108
109
108
109
―
108
123
108
133
93
125
―
108
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
409*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
PI
108
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
405*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
129
PI
109
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
406*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
129
PI
108
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
109
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
409*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
PI
108
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
346*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
109
PI
123
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
409*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
PI
108
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
294*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
66%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
87
PI
133
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
233*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
67
PI
93
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
176*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
64
PI
125
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
69%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
130
PI
108
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
0
2
2
1
400*
0
35
0
113*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
―
―
―
―
67%*
―
―
―
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
0
2
2
1
118
0
17
0
37
PI
147
―
―
―
―
147
―
―
―
103
EAMO
85
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
65
Safe Harbor Target
85
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
65
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
PI
147
EAMO
85
Safe Harbor Target
85
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
400*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
67%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
118
PI
147
EAMO
100
Safe Harbor Target
100
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
17
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
113*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
70%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
103
EAMO
65
Safe Harbor Target
65
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
404*
405*
407*
5
408*
345*
408*
295*
233*
175*
1
406*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
68%*
67%*
68%*
―
68%*
68%*
68%*
67%*
65%*
71%*
―
67%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
121
121
122
5
123
106
123
86
63
60
1
122
PI
147
147
146
148
―
147
161
147
166
151
143
―
148
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
PI
147
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
404*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
121
PI
147
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
405*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
67%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
121
PI
146
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
407*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
122
PI
148
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
PI
147
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
345*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
106
PI
161
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
408*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
68%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
123
PI
147
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
295*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
67%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
86
PI
166
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
233*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
65%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
63
PI
151
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
175*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
71%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
143
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
406*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
67%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
122
PI
148
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
0
0
0
1
138*
0
15
0
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
―
―
―
―
63%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
0
0
0
1
37
0
8
0
11
PI
187
―
―
―
―
186
―
―
―
―
EAMO
169
―
―
―
―
177
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
169
―
―
―
―
177
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
187
EAMO
169
Progress Target
169
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
138*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
186
EAMO
177
Progress Target
177
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
15
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
139*
141*
140*
1
141*
117*
141*
103*
83*
22
0
141*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
63%*
63%*
63%*
―
63%*
62%*
63%*
63%*
58%*
―
―
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
38
38
37
1
38
30
38
62
46
14
0
38
PI
187
187
187
186
―
187
190
187
194
187
―
―
187
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
187
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
139*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
187
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
187
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
140*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
186
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
187
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
117*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
62%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
30
PI
190
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
187
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
103*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
62
PI
194
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
83*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
58%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
46
PI
187
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
22
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
141*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
63%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
187
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 80 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
39
0
1
0
2
36
0
2
1
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
1
0
0
2
36
0
3
1
12
PI
185
―
―
―
―
189
―
―
―
―
EAMO
154
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
154
―
―
―
―
165
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
185
EAMO
154
Safe Harbor Target
154
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
189
EAMO
165
Safe Harbor Target
165
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
38
39
37
3
39
37
38
28
15
24
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
39
39
37
3
39
36
38
27
14
25
0
39
PI
189
185
185
184
―
185
192
184
―
―
―
―
185
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
189
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
185
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
185
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
184
Not White
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
185
General Education
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
192
English Proficient
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
184
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
25
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
185
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
39
0
1
0
2
36
0
2
1
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
1
0
0
2
36
0
3
1
12
PI
172
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
―
EAMO
138
―
―
―
―
150
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
138
―
―
―
―
150
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
172
EAMO
138
Safe Harbor Target
138
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
175
EAMO
150
Safe Harbor Target
150
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
11
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
38
39
37
3
39
37
38
28
15
24
0
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
39
39
37
3
39
36
38
27
14
25
0
39
PI
176
172
172
170
―
172
178
171
―
―
―
―
172
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
176
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
172
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
172
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
37
PI
170
Not White
12th Graders
3
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
172
General Education
12th Graders
37
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
178
English Proficient
12th Graders
38
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
171
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
24
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
25
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
39
PI
172
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
108
―
―
―
―
109
―
―
―
59
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
147
―
―
―
―
147
―
―
―
103
Secondary-Level ELA PI
185
―
―
―
―
189
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
172
―
―
―
―
175
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
153
0
0
0
0
155
0
0
0
81
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
108
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
147
Secondary-Level ELA PI
185
Secondary-Level MATH PI
172
Unweighted Combined PI
153
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
109
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
147
Secondary-Level ELA PI
189
Secondary-Level MATH PI
175
Unweighted Combined PI
155
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
59
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
103
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
81
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
1
0
0
0
36
0
4
0
5
Graduation Rate
92%
―
―
―
―
92%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
5
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
0
0
0
0
40
0
3
0
6
Graduation Rate
93%
―
―
―
―
93%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
6
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
37
37
37
1
37
33
37
32
16
21
0
37
Graduation Rate
92%
92%
92%
92%
―
92%
97%
92%
94%
―
―
―
92%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
40
40
40
0
40
37
40
34
25
15
0
40
Graduation Rate
93%
93%
93%
93%
―
93%
92%
93%
94%
―
―
―
93%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
33
Graduation Rate
97%
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
32
Graduation Rate
94%
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
21
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
92%
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
94%
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
25
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in This District Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This District)
38%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
