CHAZY CENTRAL RURAL ES - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
28%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
22
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
5%
Total Number of Classes
28
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
14%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 18
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
11%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
0%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
28%
Total Number of Core Classes
22
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
5%
Total Number of Classes
28
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
14%
Grade 3 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 313
All Students
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
11
44%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
11
44%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Female
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
3
17%
LEVEL 2
4
22%
LEVEL 3
9
50%
LEVEL 4
2
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
4
57%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
11
44%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
5
63%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
2
12%
LEVEL 2
3
18%
LEVEL 3
10
59%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
21
4
1
1
23
25
18
7
25
8
17
1
24
PROFICIENT
52%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
52%
61%
29%
52%
13%
71%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
4
16%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
16%
3
17%
1
14%
4
16%
2
25%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
8
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
32%
4
22%
4
57%
8
32%
5
63%
3
18%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
11
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
44%
9
50%
2
29%
11
44%
1
13%
10
59%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
8%
2
11%
0
0%
2
8%
0
0%
2
12%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 287
All Students
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
General Education
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
4
29%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
4
80%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
5
50%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
5
38%
LEVEL 2
4
31%
LEVEL 3
3
23%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
19
14
5
1
18
19
9
10
19
6
13
19
PROFICIENT
26%
36%
0%
_%
_%
26%
33%
20%
26%
17%
31%
26%
LEVEL 1
7
37%
3
21%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
7
37%
4
44%
3
30%
7
37%
2
33%
5
38%
7
37%
LEVEL 2
7
37%
6
43%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
7
37%
2
22%
5
50%
7
37%
3
50%
4
31%
7
37%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
4
29%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
4
21%
3
33%
1
10%
4
21%
1
17%
3
23%
4
21%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
1
7%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
5%
0
0%
1
10%
1
5%
0
0%
1
8%
1
5%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
5
29%
LEVEL 2
7
41%
LEVEL 3
3
18%
LEVEL 4
2
12%
Male
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
2
14%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
5
50%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
9
43%
LEVEL 3
8
38%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
29
2
1
30
31
17
14
31
10
21
31
PROFICIENT
35%
_%
_%
_%
_%
35%
29%
43%
35%
10%
48%
35%
LEVEL 1
7
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
23%
5
29%
2
14%
7
23%
5
50%
2
10%
7
23%
LEVEL 2
13
42%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
42%
7
41%
6
43%
13
42%
4
40%
9
43%
13
42%
LEVEL 3
9
29%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
29%
3
18%
6
43%
9
29%
1
10%
8
38%
9
29%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
2
12%
0
0%
2
6%
0
0%
2
10%
2
6%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 310
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
General Education
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
11
48%
LEVEL 3
5
22%
LEVEL 4
6
26%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Female
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
5
33%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
4
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
10
50%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
6
30%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
29
23
6
1
28
29
15
14
29
9
20
29
PROFICIENT
38%
48%
0%
_%
_%
38%
47%
29%
38%
11%
50%
38%
LEVEL 1
5
17%
1
4%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
5
17%
1
7%
4
29%
5
17%
5
56%
0
0%
5
17%
LEVEL 2
13
45%
11
48%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
13
45%
7
47%
6
43%
13
45%
3
33%
10
50%
13
45%
LEVEL 3
5
17%
5
22%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
17%
5
33%
0
0%
5
17%
1
11%
4
20%
5
17%
LEVEL 4
6
21%
6
26%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
6
21%
2
13%
4
29%
6
21%
0
0%
6
30%
6
21%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: _
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 3 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 329
All Students
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
3
17%
LEVEL 3
6
33%
LEVEL 4
8
44%
Male
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
2
29%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
6
35%
LEVEL 4
9
53%
Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Migrant
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
21
4
1
1
23
25
18
7
25
8
17
1
24
PROFICIENT
72%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
72%
78%
57%
72%
38%
88%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
8%
1
6%
1
14%
2
8%
1
13%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
5
20%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
20%
3
17%
2
29%
5
20%
4
50%
1
6%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
8
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
32%
6
33%
2
29%
8
32%
2
25%
6
35%
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
10
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
40%
8
44%
2
29%
10
40%
1
13%
9
53%
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 283
All Students
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Female
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
5
56%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
3
33%
LEVEL 2
2
22%
LEVEL 3
3
33%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
4
33%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
18
14
4
1
17
18
9
9
18
6
12
18
PROFICIENT
28%
_%
_%
_%
_%
28%
11%
44%
28%
0%
42%
28%
LEVEL 1
8
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
44%
5
56%
3
33%
8
44%
4
67%
4
33%
8
44%
LEVEL 2
5
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
28%
3
33%
2
22%
5
28%
2
33%
3
25%
5
28%
LEVEL 3
4
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
22%
1
11%
3
33%
4
22%
0
0%
4
33%
4
22%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
1
11%
1
6%
0
0%
1
8%
1
6%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 333
All Students
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
42%
LEVEL 4
7
58%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
2
25%
LEVEL 2
4
50%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
7
37%
LEVEL 4
9
47%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27
LEVEL 1
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
27
26
1
1
26
27
15
12
27
8
19
27
PROFICIENT
67%
_%
_%
_%
_%
67%
40%
100%
67%
25%
84%
67%
LEVEL 1
2
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
7%
2
13%
0
0%
2
7%
2
25%
0
0%
2
7%
LEVEL 2
7
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
26%
7
47%
0
0%
7
26%
4
50%
3
16%
7
26%
LEVEL 3
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
33%
4
27%
5
42%
9
33%
2
25%
7
37%
9
33%
LEVEL 4
9
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
33%
2
13%
7
58%
9
33%
0
0%
9
47%
9
33%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 339
All Students
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
Female
PROFICIENT
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
21%
LEVEL 3
3
21%
LEVEL 4
8
57%
Male
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
6
50%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
1
14%
LEVEL 3
3
43%
LEVEL 4
2
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
16%
LEVEL 3
4
21%
LEVEL 4
12
63%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
26
22
4
1
25
26
14
12
26
7
19
26
PROFICIENT
81%
_%
_%
_%
_%
81%
79%
83%
81%
71%
84%
81%
LEVEL 1
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
0
0%
1
8%
1
4%
1
14%
0
0%
1
4%
LEVEL 2
4
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
15%
3
21%
1
8%
4
15%
1
14%
3
16%
4
15%
LEVEL 3
7
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
27%
3
21%
4
33%
7
27%
3
43%
4
21%
7
27%
LEVEL 4
14
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
54%
8
57%
6
50%
14
54%
2
29%
12
63%
14
54%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: _
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Female
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Male
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Grade 4 Science
MEAN SCORE: 82
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
General Education
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
55%
LEVEL 4
9
45%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Female
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
8
67%
LEVEL 4
3
25%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
7
54%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
67%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
10
53%
LEVEL 4
8
42%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
25
20
5
1
24
25
12
13
25
6
19
25
PROFICIENT
96%
100%
80%
_%
_%
96%
92%
100%
96%
100%
95%
96%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
0
0%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
1
4%
1
8%
0
0%
1
4%
0
0%
1
5%
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
56%
11
55%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
14
56%
8
67%
6
46%
14
56%
4
67%
10
53%
14
56%
LEVEL 4
10
40%
9
45%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
10
40%
3
25%
7
54%
10
40%
2
33%
8
42%
10
40%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
258*
0
2
2
1
251*
0
23
0
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
―
―
―
―
83%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
0
2
2
1
99
0
16
0
32
PI
119
―
―
―
―
120
―
―
―
69
EAMO
87
―
―
―
―
104
―
―
―
67
Safe Harbor Target
87
―
―
―
―
104
―
―
―
20
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
258*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
PI
119
EAMO
87
Safe Harbor Target
87
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
251*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
99
PI
120
EAMO
104
Safe Harbor Target
104
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
16
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
69
EAMO
67
Safe Harbor Target
20
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
258*
255*
255*
257*
5
258*
223*
258*
188*
130*
128*
1
257*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
83%*
83%*
83%*
―
83%*
84%*
83%*
81%*
80%*
87%*
―
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
102
102
103
5
104
88
104
72
44
60
1
103
PI
119
120
119
120
―
119
134
119
142
111
125
―
119
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
258*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
PI
119
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
255*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
102
PI
120
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
255*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
102
PI
119
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
257*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
103
PI
120
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
258*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
PI
119
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
223*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
84%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
88
PI
134
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
258*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
104
PI
119
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
188*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
72
PI
142
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
130*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
80%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
44
PI
111
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
128*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
87%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
125
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
257*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
83%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
103
PI
119
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259*
0
2
2
1
252*
0
23
0
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
―
―
―
―
79%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
0
2
2
1
91
0
12
0
28
PI
155
―
―
―
―
156
―
―
―
―
EAMO
84
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
84
―
―
―
―
100
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
155
EAMO
84
Safe Harbor Target
84
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
252*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
91
PI
156
EAMO
100
Safe Harbor Target
100
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259*
256*
256*
258*
5
259*
223*
259*
189*
131*
128*
1
257*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
79%*
79%*
79%*
―
79%*
81%*
79%*
78%*
73%*
85%*
―
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
94
94
95
5
96
84
96
68
39
57
1
95
PI
155
155
154
157
―
155
169
155
174
172
144
―
156
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
155
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
256*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
94
PI
155
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
256*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
94
PI
154
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
258*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
95
PI
157
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
155
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
223*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
81%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
84
PI
169
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
155
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
189*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
78%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
174
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
73%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
39
PI
172
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
128*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
85%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
144
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
257*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
79%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
95
PI
156
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
0
0
0
1
24
0
5
0
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
0
1
0
1
54**
0
6
0
14
PI
200**
―
―
―
―
200**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
172
―
―
―
―
180
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
172
―
―
―
―
180
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
PI
200**
EAMO
172
Progress Target
172
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
54**
PI
200**
EAMO
180
Progress Target
180
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
5
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
6
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
6
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
25
25
24
1
25
20
25
19
13
12
0
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
55**
56**
55**
2
56**
50**
56**
42**
28
28
0
56**
PI
200**
200**
200**
200**
―
200**
200**
200**
200**
―
―
―
200**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
PI
200**
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55**
PI
200**
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
PI
200**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
24
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55**
PI
200**
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
PI
200**
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
20
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
50**
PI
200**
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
PI
200**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
19
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
42**
PI
200**
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
12
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
56**
PI
200**
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. **The number of tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test period in the school/district in the current year is less than 30, so the numbers in the current year and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
119
―
―
―
―
120
―
―
―
69
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
155
―
―
―
―
156
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
137
0
0
0
0
138
0
0
0
69
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
119
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
155
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
137
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
120
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
156
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
138
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
69
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
69
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
