CHAZY CENTRAL RURAL JR-SR HS - School Report Card Data [2015 - 16]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
CHAZY CENTRAL RURAL JR-SR HS ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
220
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
117
53%
FEMALE
103
47%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
WHITE
TOTAL
2
1
217
PERCENT
1%
0%
99%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
30
14%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
61
28%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
TOTAL
33
39
38
35
40
35
PERCENT
15%
18%
17%
16%
18%
16%
CHAZY CENTRAL RURAL JR-SR HS ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)
K-12 Enrollment: 220
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
117
53%
FEMALE
103
47%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
2
1%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
1
0%
WHITE
217
99%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
—
—
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
30
14%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
61
28%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
7TH GRADE
33
15%
8TH GRADE
39
18%
9TH GRADE
38
17%
10TH GRADE
35
16%
11TH GRADE
40
18%
12TH GRADE
35
16%
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
GROUP
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 8 Social Studies
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Mathematics
Grade 10 Science
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
19
18
20
20
18
8
17
17
Average Class Size (2015 - 16)
Grade 8 English
19
Grade 8 Mathematics
18
Grade 8 Science
20
Grade 8 Social Studies
20
Grade 10 English
18
Grade 10 Mathematics
8
Grade 10 Science
17
Grade 10 Social Studies
17
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
48
22%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
13
6%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2015 - 16)
Eligible for Free Lunch
48
22%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
13
6%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2014 - 15)
9
4%
Student Suspensions (2014 - 15)
Student Suspensions
9
4%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS
20
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
0%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
5%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
10%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
35%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
74
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
1%
Total Number of Classes
111
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Teacher Qualifications (2015 - 16)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 20
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
0%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
5%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
10%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
35%
Total Number of Core Classes
74
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
1%
Total Number of Classes
111
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
High School Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
36
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
36
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
36
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
8
22%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
36
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
36
Regents Diploma
36
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
8
22%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
36
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
36
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
36
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
8
22%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
36
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
36
Regents Diploma
36
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
8
22%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
36
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
36
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
36
100%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
8
22%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
3
8%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
36
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
36
Regents Diploma
36
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
8
22%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
3
8%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_
_
_
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_
_
_
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_
_
_
All Students
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
_
_%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
_
_%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
_
_%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2015 - 16)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
17
47%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
36%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
5
14%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
17
47%
To Two-Year College
13
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
5
14%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
17
47%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
36%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
5
14%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
17
47%
To Two-Year College
13
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
5
14%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
17
47%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
13
36%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
1
3%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
5
14%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
17
47%
To Two-Year College
13
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
1
3%
To the Military
5
14%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Grade 7 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
3
30%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
2
20%
Male
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
4
40%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
1
10%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
3
50%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
4
29%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
7
35%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
17
3
1
1
18
20
10
10
20
6
14
20
PROFICIENT
25%
_%
_%
_%
_%
_%
25%
30%
20%
25%
17%
29%
25%
LEVEL 1
7
35%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
35%
3
30%
4
40%
7
35%
3
50%
4
29%
7
35%
LEVEL 2
8
40%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
40%
4
40%
4
40%
8
40%
2
33%
6
43%
8
40%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
10%
1
10%
1
10%
2
10%
0
0%
2
14%
2
10%
LEVEL 4
3
15%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
15%
2
20%
1
10%
3
15%
1
17%
2
14%
3
15%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
MEAN SCORE: 298
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
11
55%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
11
55%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
1
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
5
36%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
11
55%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
3
50%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
3
21%
LEVEL 2
8
57%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
11
55%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
20
18
2
20
6
14
20
6
14
20
PROFICIENT
20%
_%
_%
20%
33%
14%
20%
17%
21%
20%
LEVEL 1
5
25%
_
_
_
_
5
25%
0
0%
5
36%
5
25%
2
33%
3
21%
5
25%
LEVEL 2
11
55%
_
_
_
_
11
55%
4
67%
7
50%
11
55%
3
50%
8
57%
11
55%
LEVEL 3
2
10%
_
_
_
_
2
10%
1
17%
1
7%
2
10%
1
17%
1
7%
2
10%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
_
_
_
_
2
10%
1
17%
1
7%
2
10%
0
0%
2
14%
2
10%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 305
All Students
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
8
33%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
General Education
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18
LEVEL 1
4
22%
LEVEL 2
8
44%
LEVEL 3
3
17%
LEVEL 4
3
17%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
2
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 22
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
8
33%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
4
31%
LEVEL 2
6
46%
LEVEL 3
2
15%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
4
36%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
1
9%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
8
33%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
6
67%
LEVEL 2
3
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
7
47%
LEVEL 3
3
20%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
8
33%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
18
6
1
1
22
24
13
11
24
9
15
24
PROFICIENT
25%
33%
0%
_%
_%
_%
25%
23%
27%
25%
0%
40%
25%
LEVEL 1
8
33%
4
22%
4
67%
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
33%
4
31%
4
36%
8
33%
6
67%
2
13%
8
33%
LEVEL 2
10
42%
8
44%
2
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
42%
6
46%
4
36%
10
42%
3
33%
7
47%
10
42%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
3
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
13%
2
15%
1
9%
3
13%
0
0%
3
20%
3
13%
LEVEL 4
3
13%
3
17%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
13%
1
8%
2
18%
3
13%
0
0%
3
20%
3
13%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
8
53%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
8
53%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
2
33%
LEVEL 2
4
67%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
4
44%
LEVEL 2
4
44%
LEVEL 3
1
11%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
8
53%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
4
67%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
1
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
2
22%
LEVEL 2
7
78%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
8
53%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
15
13
2
15
6
9
15
6
9
15
PROFICIENT
7%
_%
_%
7%
0%
11%
7%
17%
0%
7%
LEVEL 1
6
40%
_
_
_
_
6
40%
2
33%
4
44%
6
40%
4
67%
2
22%
6
40%
LEVEL 2
8
53%
_
_
_
_
8
53%
4
67%
4
44%
8
53%
1
17%
7
78%
8
53%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
_
_
_
_
1
7%
0
0%
1
11%
1
7%
1
17%
0
0%
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Math Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE
_
_
LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE
_
_
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
4 & ABOVE
_
_
3 & ABOVE
_
_
Grade 8 Science
Due to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 proficiency rates.
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 76
All Students
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Female
PROFICIENT
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
17%
LEVEL 3
3
50%
LEVEL 4
2
33%
Male
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
13
87%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
81%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
20
1
21
6
15
21
5
16
21
PROFICIENT
90%
_%
_%
90%
83%
93%
90%
60%
100%
90%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
_
_
_
_
2
10%
1
17%
1
7%
2
10%
2
40%
0
0%
2
10%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
_
_
_
_
16
76%
3
50%
13
87%
16
76%
3
60%
13
81%
16
76%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
_
_
_
_
3
14%
2
33%
1
7%
3
14%
0
0%
3
19%
3
14%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
English Language Learners
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
28%
LEVEL 4
22
69%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
35%
LEVEL 4
12
60%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
35%
LEVEL 4
11
65%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
56%
LEVEL 4
3
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
29%
LEVEL 4
20
71%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
2
35
37
20
17
37
9
28
37
PROFICIENT
97%
97%
100%
_%
_%
97%
95%
100%
97%
89%
100%
97%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
9
28%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
13
35%
7
35%
6
35%
13
35%
5
56%
8
29%
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
22
69%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
23
62%
12
60%
11
65%
23
62%
3
33%
20
71%
23
62%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
59%
LEVEL 4
14
38%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
17
53%
LEVEL 4
14
44%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
59%
LEVEL 4
14
38%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
55%
LEVEL 4
8
40%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
65%
LEVEL 4
6
35%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
59%
LEVEL 4
14
38%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
78%
LEVEL 4
1
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
54%
LEVEL 4
13
46%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
59%
LEVEL 4
14
38%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
2
35
37
20
17
37
9
28
37
PROFICIENT
97%
97%
100%
_%
_%
97%
95%
100%
97%
89%
100%
97%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
22
59%
17
53%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
22
59%
11
55%
11
65%
22
59%
7
78%
15
54%
22
59%
LEVEL 4
14
38%
14
44%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
14
38%
8
40%
6
35%
14
38%
1
11%
13
46%
14
38%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
28%
LEVEL 4
22
69%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
80%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
40%
LEVEL 4
11
55%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
12
71%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
67%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
25%
LEVEL 4
21
75%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
2
35
37
20
17
37
9
28
37
PROFICIENT
97%
97%
100%
_%
_%
97%
95%
100%
97%
89%
100%
97%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
9
28%
4
80%
_
_
_
_
13
35%
8
40%
5
29%
13
35%
6
67%
7
25%
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
22
69%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
23
62%
11
55%
12
71%
23
62%
2
22%
21
75%
23
62%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
27
73%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
19%
LEVEL 4
25
78%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
3
60%
LEVEL 4
2
40%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
27
73%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
20%
LEVEL 4
15
75%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
12
71%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
27
73%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
4
44%
LEVEL 4
4
44%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
18%
LEVEL 4
23
82%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
27
73%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
2
35
37
20
17
37
9
28
37
PROFICIENT
97%
97%
100%
_%
_%
97%
95%
100%
97%
89%
100%
97%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
6
19%
3
60%
_
_
_
_
9
24%
4
20%
5
29%
9
24%
4
44%
5
18%
9
24%
LEVEL 4
27
73%
25
78%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
27
73%
15
75%
12
71%
27
73%
4
44%
23
82%
27
73%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
General Education
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
25%
LEVEL 4
23
72%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
40%
LEVEL 4
11
55%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
29%
LEVEL 4
12
71%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
67%
LEVEL 4
2
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
25%
LEVEL 4
21
75%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
32
5
2
35
37
20
17
37
9
28
37
PROFICIENT
97%
97%
100%
_%
_%
97%
95%
100%
97%
89%
100%
97%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
35%
8
25%
5
100%
_
_
_
_
13
35%
8
40%
5
29%
13
35%
6
67%
7
25%
13
35%
LEVEL 4
23
62%
23
72%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
23
62%
11
55%
12
71%
23
62%
2
22%
21
75%
23
62%
Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
White
Small Group Total
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
37
2
1
38
39
24
15
39
9
30
39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
5%
1
4%
1
7%
2
5%
0
0%
2
7%
2
5%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
10
26%
8
33%
2
13%
10
26%
4
44%
6
20%
10
26%
LEVEL 5
27
69%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
27
69%
15
63%
12
80%
27
69%
5
56%
22
73%
27
69%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
LEVEL 5
27
69%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
LEVEL 5
27
69%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
4%
LEVEL 4
8
33%
LEVEL 5
15
63%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
LEVEL 5
12
80%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
LEVEL 5
27
69%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
4
44%
LEVEL 5
5
56%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
7%
LEVEL 4
6
20%
LEVEL 5
22
73%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
10
26%
LEVEL 5
27
69%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Small Group Total
Female
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
12
12
12
10
2
12
2
10
12
55
5
42%
5
42%
5
42%
_
_
_
_
5
42%
_
_
_
_
5
42%
65
2
17%
2
17%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
42%
65
2
17%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
42%
65
2
17%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
42%
65
2
17%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
42%
65
2
17%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
42%
65
2
17%
85
0
0%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
26
5
1
30
31
9
22
31
8
23
31
LEVEL 1
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
1
4%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
3
10%
0
0%
3
14%
3
10%
2
25%
1
4%
3
10%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
9
35%
2
40%
_
_
_
_
11
35%
2
22%
9
41%
11
35%
4
50%
7
30%
11
35%
LEVEL 4
12
39%
11
42%
1
20%
_
_
_
_
12
39%
5
56%
7
32%
12
39%
2
25%
10
43%
12
39%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
5
19%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
5
16%
2
22%
3
14%
5
16%
0
0%
5
22%
5
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
12
39%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
9
35%
LEVEL 4
11
42%
LEVEL 5
5
19%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
12
39%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
2
22%
LEVEL 4
5
56%
LEVEL 5
2
22%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
14%
LEVEL 3
9
41%
LEVEL 4
7
32%
LEVEL 5
3
14%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
12
39%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
4
50%
LEVEL 4
2
25%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
7
30%
LEVEL 4
10
43%
LEVEL 5
5
22%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
10%
LEVEL 3
11
35%
LEVEL 4
12
39%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
34
34
19
15
34
8
26
34
LEVEL 1
4
12%
4
12%
4
12%
4
21%
0
0%
4
12%
4
50%
0
0%
4
12%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
10
29%
10
29%
9
47%
1
7%
10
29%
1
13%
9
35%
10
29%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
17
50%
17
50%
6
32%
11
73%
17
50%
2
25%
15
58%
17
50%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
3
9%
3
9%
0
0%
3
20%
3
9%
1
13%
2
8%
3
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
21%
LEVEL 2
9
47%
LEVEL 3
6
32%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
11
73%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
9
35%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
10
29%
LEVEL 3
17
50%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Algebra II (Common Core)
Algebra II (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
31
31
2
29
31
16
15
31
5
26
31
LEVEL 1
2
6%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
2
13%
0
0%
2
6%
1
20%
1
4%
2
6%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
2
6%
_
_
_
_
2
6%
1
6%
1
7%
2
6%
1
20%
1
4%
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
52%
16
52%
_
_
_
_
16
52%
6
38%
10
67%
16
52%
2
40%
14
54%
16
52%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
6
19%
_
_
_
_
6
19%
4
25%
2
13%
6
19%
1
20%
5
19%
6
19%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
5
16%
_
_
_
_
5
16%
3
19%
2
13%
5
16%
0
0%
5
19%
5
16%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
52%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
52%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
52%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
1
6%
LEVEL 3
6
38%
LEVEL 4
4
25%
LEVEL 5
3
19%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
67%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
LEVEL 5
2
13%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
52%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
1
20%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
1
4%
LEVEL 3
14
54%
LEVEL 4
5
19%
LEVEL 5
5
19%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
2
6%
LEVEL 3
16
52%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
LEVEL 5
5
16%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
34
30
4
1
33
34
17
17
34
6
28
34
55
33
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
97%
17
100%
16
94%
33
97%
5
83%
28
100%
33
97%
65
30
88%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
88%
15
88%
15
88%
30
88%
5
83%
25
89%
30
88%
85
18
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
53%
8
47%
10
59%
18
53%
1
17%
17
61%
18
53%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
30
88%
85
18
53%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
30
88%
85
18
53%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
100%
65
15
88%
85
8
47%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
94%
65
15
88%
85
10
59%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
30
88%
85
18
53%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
5
83%
85
1
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
100%
65
25
89%
85
17
61%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
30
88%
85
18
53%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
37
2
1
38
39
24
15
39
9
30
39
55
38
97%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
38
97%
23
96%
15
100%
38
97%
9
100%
29
97%
38
97%
65
37
95%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
37
95%
22
92%
15
100%
37
95%
8
89%
29
97%
37
95%
85
17
44%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
44%
11
46%
6
40%
17
44%
2
22%
15
50%
17
44%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
37
95%
85
17
44%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
37
95%
85
17
44%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
96%
65
22
92%
85
11
46%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
100%
65
15
100%
85
6
40%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
37
95%
85
17
44%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
9
100%
65
8
89%
85
2
22%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
29
97%
85
15
50%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
38
97%
65
37
95%
85
17
44%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
32
28
4
32
16
16
32
6
26
32
55
32
100%
_
_
_
_
32
100%
16
100%
16
100%
32
100%
6
100%
26
100%
32
100%
65
32
100%
_
_
_
_
32
100%
16
100%
16
100%
32
100%
6
100%
26
100%
32
100%
85
20
63%
_
_
_
_
20
63%
8
50%
12
75%
20
63%
3
50%
17
65%
20
63%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
20
63%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
20
63%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
16
100%
85
8
50%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 16
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
16
100%
65
16
100%
85
12
75%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
20
63%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
100%
65
6
100%
85
3
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
100%
65
26
100%
85
17
65%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
100%
65
32
100%
85
20
63%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
37
29
8
37
7
30
37
12
25
37
55
36
97%
28
97%
8
100%
36
97%
7
100%
29
97%
36
97%
11
92%
25
100%
36
97%
65
34
92%
28
97%
6
75%
34
92%
7
100%
27
90%
34
92%
10
83%
24
96%
34
92%
85
12
32%
12
41%
0
0%
12
32%
2
29%
10
33%
12
32%
2
17%
10
40%
12
32%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
97%
65
34
92%
85
12
32%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 29
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
28
97%
65
28
97%
85
12
41%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 8
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
100%
65
6
75%
85
0
0%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
97%
65
34
92%
85
12
32%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
27
90%
85
10
33%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
97%
65
34
92%
85
12
32%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
10
83%
85
2
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 25
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
25
100%
65
24
96%
85
10
40%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 37
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
36
97%
65
34
92%
85
12
32%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Black or African American
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
21
21
1
20
21
10
11
21
1
20
21
55
21
100%
21
100%
_
_
_
_
21
100%
10
100%
11
100%
21
100%
_
_
_
_
21
100%
65
17
81%
17
81%
_
_
_
_
17
81%
8
80%
9
82%
17
81%
_
_
_
_
17
81%
85
4
19%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
4
19%
3
30%
1
9%
4
19%
_
_
_
_
4
19%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
17
81%
85
4
19%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
17
81%
85
4
19%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
17
81%
85
4
19%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 10
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
10
100%
65
8
80%
85
3
30%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
9
82%
85
1
9%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
17
81%
85
4
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 20
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
100%
65
17
81%
85
4
19%
Physical Setting/Physics
Regents Physical Setting/Physics
GROUP
All Students
General Education
White
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
7
7
7
3
4
7
7
7
55
7
100%
7
100%
7
100%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
7
100%
7
100%
65
7
100%
7
100%
7
100%
_
_
_
_
7
100%
7
100%
7
100%
85
2
29%
2
29%
2
29%
_
_
_
_
2
29%
2
29%
2
29%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
White
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
7
100%
65
7
100%
85
2
29%
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
0
1
1
0
144*
0
10
0
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
―
―
―
―
46%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
0
0
1
0
37
0
5
0
10
PI
97
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
―
EAMO
88
―
―
―
―
103
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
83
―
―
―
―
83
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
97
EAMO
88
Safe Harbor Target
83
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
144*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
46%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
97
EAMO
103
Safe Harbor Target
83
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
145*
145*
146*
2
146*
123*
146*
97*
38
35
0
146*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
46%*
46%*
47%*
―
47%*
46%*
47%*
45%*
―
―
―
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
38
37
38
1
38
33
38
43
22
16
0
38
PI
97
97
97
97
―
97
109
97
98
―
―
―
97
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
97
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
46%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
97
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
46%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
37
PI
97
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
97
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
97
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
123*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
46%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
109
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
97
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
97*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
45%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43
PI
98
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
22
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
16
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
146*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
97
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
NO
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
0
1
1
0
143*
0
10
0
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
―
―
―
―
48%*
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
NO
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
0
0
1
0
39
0
7
0
12
PI
98
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
―
EAMO
86
―
―
―
―
99
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
86
―
―
―
―
99
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
98
EAMO
86
Safe Harbor Target
86
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
NO
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
143*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
48%*
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
39
PI
97
EAMO
99
Safe Harbor Target
99
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
10
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
12
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
144*
144*
145*
2
145*
123*
145*
97*
38
35
0
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
49%*
49%*
49%*
―
49%*
47%*
49%*
48%*
―
―
―
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
40
39
40
1
40
33
40
46
21
19
0
40
PI
98
98
97
98
―
98
115
98
128
―
―
―
98
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
98
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
144*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
98
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
144*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
39
PI
97
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
98
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
98
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
123*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
47%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
33
PI
115
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
98
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
97*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
48%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
46
PI
128
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
19
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
145*
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
49%*
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
40
PI
98
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. *The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district with another opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
0
0
0
0
39
0
4
0
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
0
0
0
0
35**
0
5
0
10
PI
183**
―
―
―
―
183**
―
―
―
―
EAMO
171
―
―
―
―
178
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
1
―
―
―
―
1
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
EAMO
171
Progress Target
1
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
EAMO
178
Progress Target
1
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
39
39
39
0
39
35
39
25
23
16
0
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
35**
35**
35**
0
35**
30**
35**
25
26
9
0
35**
PI
183**
183**
183**
183**
―
183**
187**
183**
―
―
―
―
183**
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
30**
PI
187**
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
25
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
23
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
26
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
35**
PI
183**
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed. **The number of tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test period in the school/district in the current year is less than 30, so the numbers in the current year and previous year were combined to determine a Performance Index.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
36
0
1
0
0
35
0
4
0
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
0
1
0
0
34
0
5
0
8
PI
197
―
―
―
―
197
―
―
―
―
EAMO
158
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
158
―
―
―
―
166
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
197
EAMO
158
Safe Harbor Target
158
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
197
EAMO
166
Safe Harbor Target
166
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
35
36
36
1
36
32
36
28
16
20
0
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
34
35
35
1
35
30
35
27
17
18
0
35
PI
197
197
197
197
―
197
200
197
―
―
―
―
197
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
197
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
197
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
197
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
197
Not White
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
197
General Education
12th Graders
32
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
30
PI
200
English Proficient
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
197
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
20
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
18
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
197
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
36
0
1
0
0
35
0
4
0
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
0
1
0
0
34
0
5
0
8
PI
171
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
―
EAMO
143
―
―
―
―
153
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
143
―
―
―
―
153
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
171
EAMO
143
Safe Harbor Target
143
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
171
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
153
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
5
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
8
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
35
36
36
1
36
32
36
28
16
20
0
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
34
35
35
1
35
30
35
27
17
18
0
35
PI
171
171
171
171
―
171
183
171
―
―
―
―
171
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
171
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
35
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
34
PI
171
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
171
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
171
Not White
12th Graders
1
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
1
PI
―
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
171
General Education
12th Graders
32
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
30
PI
183
English Proficient
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
171
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
27
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
16
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
20
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
18
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2012 Accountability Cohort Members
35
PI
171
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
97
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
98
―
―
―
―
97
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
197
―
―
―
―
197
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
171
―
―
―
―
171
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
141
0
0
0
0
141
0
0
0
0
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
97
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
98
Secondary-Level ELA PI
197
Secondary-Level MATH PI
171
Unweighted Combined PI
141
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
97
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
97
Secondary-Level ELA PI
197
Secondary-Level MATH PI
171
Unweighted Combined PI
141
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
YES
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
0
0
0
2
38
0
2
1
12
Graduation Rate
93%
―
―
―
―
92%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
92%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
12
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
YES
―
―
―
―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
1
1
0
0
36
0
4
0
7
Graduation Rate
95%
―
―
―
―
94%
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
80%
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
95%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
7
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
40
40
38
2
40
38
39
28
15
25
0
40
Graduation Rate
93%
93%
93%
92%
―
93%
92%
92%
―
―
―
―
93%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
37
38
38
2
38
34
38
31
16
22
0
38
Graduation Rate
95%
95%
95%
95%
―
95%
100%
95%
97%
―
―
―
95%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Black or African American
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
92%
Not White
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
General Education
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
92%
English Proficient
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
39
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
28
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
25
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
93%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Black or African American
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
37
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
95%
Not White
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
95%
General Education
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
100%
English Proficient
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
95%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
97%
Male
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
22
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
95%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
45%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)
45%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
32%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
8%
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)
5%
Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide
YES
Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
