SYRACUSE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE CS - School Report Card Data [2011 - 12]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
SYRACUSE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE CS ENROLLMENT (2011 - 12)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
583
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
261
45%
FEMALE
322
55%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
TOTAL
15
315
97
26
130
PERCENT
3%
54%
17%
4%
22%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
34
6%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
38
7%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
412
71%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
TOTAL
45
34
45
25
47
73
66
65
63
72
48
PERCENT
8%
6%
8%
4%
8%
13%
11%
11%
11%
12%
8%
SYRACUSE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE CS ENROLLMENT (2011 - 12)
K-12 Enrollment: 583
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
261
45%
FEMALE
322
55%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
15
3%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
315
54%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
97
17%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
26
4%
WHITE
130
22%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
34
6%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
38
7%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
412
71%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
45
8%
1ST GRADE
34
6%
2ND GRADE
45
8%
5TH GRADE
25
4%
6TH GRADE
47
8%
7TH GRADE
73
13%
8TH GRADE
66
11%
9TH GRADE
65
11%
10TH GRADE
63
11%
11TH GRADE
72
12%
12TH GRADE
48
8%
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 Mathematics
CLASS SIZE
20
22
24
24
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
24
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 Mathematics
CLASS SIZE
20
22
24
24
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
24
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 Mathematics
CLASS SIZE
20
22
24
24
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
24
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 Mathematics
CLASS SIZE
20
22
24
24
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
24
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 Mathematics
CLASS SIZE
20
22
24
24
20
Average Class Size (2011 - 12)
Common Branch
20
Grade 8 English
22
Grade 8 Mathematics
24
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 Mathematics
20
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2011 - 12)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
356
61%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
89
15%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2011 - 12)
Eligible for Free Lunch
356
61%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
89
15%
ATTENDANCE (2010 - 11)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
95%
Attendance (2010 - 11)
Annual Attendance Rate
95%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2010-11 to 2011-12)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
35%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
29%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2010-11 to 2011-12)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
35%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
29%
Staff Counts (2011 - 12)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
1
3
17
0
Staff Counts (2011 - 12)
Principals
1
Assistant Principals
3
Other Professional Staff
17
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2011 - 12)
TOTAL TEACHERS
39
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
3%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
3%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
41%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
8%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
72
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
87
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
Teacher Qualifications (2011 - 12)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 39
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
3%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
3%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
41%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
8%
Total Number of Core Classes
72
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
0%
Total Number of Classes
87
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
3%
High School Completers (2011 - 12)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
47
45
2
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
47
45
2
REGENTS DIPLOMA
46
98%
44
98%
2
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
6
13%
6
13%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
47
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
47
Regents Diploma
46
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
6
13%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
45
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
45
Regents Diploma
44
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
6
13%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
2
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
2
Regents Diploma
2
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
47
45
2
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
47
45
2
REGENTS DIPLOMA
46
98%
44
98%
2
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
6
13%
6
13%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
47
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
47
Regents Diploma
46
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
6
13%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
45
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
45
Regents Diploma
44
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
6
13%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
2
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
2
Regents Diploma
2
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
47
45
2
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
47
45
2
REGENTS DIPLOMA
46
98%
44
98%
2
100%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
6
13%
6
13%
0
0%
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
47
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
47
Regents Diploma
46
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
6
13%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
45
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
45
Regents Diploma
44
98%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
6
13%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
2%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
2
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
2
Regents Diploma
2
100%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
0
0%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
0
0%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
High School Non-completers (2011 - 12)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
0
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
0
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
2
1%
0
0%
All Students
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
General Education
DROPPED OUT
2
1%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
2
1%
Students with Disabilities
DROPPED OUT
0
0%
ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM
0
0%
TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS
0
0%
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2011 - 12)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
60%
28
62%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
17
36%
15
33%
2
100%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
4%
2
4%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
60%
To Two-Year College
17
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
28
62%
To Two-Year College
15
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
2
100%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
60%
28
62%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
17
36%
15
33%
2
100%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
4%
2
4%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
60%
To Two-Year College
17
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
28
62%
To Two-Year College
15
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
2
100%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
28
60%
28
62%
0
0%
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
17
36%
15
33%
2
100%
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
2
4%
2
4%
0
0%
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
PLANS UNKNOWN
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
To Four-Year College
28
60%
To Two-Year College
17
36%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
General Education
To Four-Year College
28
62%
To Two-Year College
15
33%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
2
4%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
0
0%
To Two-Year College
2
100%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
0
0%
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 662
All Students
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
46%
LEVEL 3
9
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
7
50%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
60%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
3
60%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
1
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
2
15%
LEVEL 2
5
38%
LEVEL 3
6
46%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
6
55%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
46%
LEVEL 3
9
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
20
4
3
14
5
2
5
13
11
21
3
20
4
24
PROFICIENT
38%
_%
_%
_%
43%
40%
_%
20%
46%
27%
_%
_%
_%
_%
38%
LEVEL 1
4
17%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
7%
0
0%
_
_
3
60%
2
15%
2
18%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
17%
LEVEL 2
11
46%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
50%
3
60%
_
_
1
20%
5
38%
6
55%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
11
46%
LEVEL 3
9
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
43%
2
40%
_
_
1
20%
6
46%
3
27%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
38%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 662
All Students
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
27
61%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
2
10%
LEVEL 2
4
20%
LEVEL 3
14
70%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
4
33%
LEVEL 3
7
58%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
3
25%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
6
50%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
4
16%
LEVEL 2
3
12%
LEVEL 3
18
72%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
2
11%
LEVEL 2
8
42%
LEVEL 3
9
47%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
27
69%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
4
80%
LEVEL 2
1
20%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
5
17%
LEVEL 2
10
34%
LEVEL 3
14
48%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
13
87%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
6
14%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
27
61%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
41
3
1
20
11
12
12
25
19
39
5
29
15
44
PROFICIENT
61%
_%
_%
_%
70%
_%
58%
50%
72%
47%
69%
0%
48%
87%
61%
LEVEL 1
6
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
10%
_
_
1
8%
3
25%
4
16%
2
11%
2
5%
4
80%
5
17%
1
7%
6
14%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
20%
_
_
4
33%
3
25%
3
12%
8
42%
10
26%
1
20%
10
34%
1
7%
11
25%
LEVEL 3
27
61%
_
_
_
_
_
_
14
70%
_
_
7
58%
6
50%
18
72%
9
47%
27
69%
0
0%
14
48%
13
87%
27
61%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 667
All Students
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
31
45%
LEVEL 3
34
49%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
18
50%
LEVEL 3
16
44%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
White
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
8
57%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
5
63%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
16
46%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Male
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
15
44%
LEVEL 3
18
53%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
26
49%
LEVEL 3
26
49%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
31
45%
LEVEL 3
34
49%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
66
3
5
3
36
11
14
8
35
34
68
1
53
16
69
PROFICIENT
54%
_%
_%
_%
_%
50%
55%
57%
63%
51%
56%
_%
_%
49%
69%
54%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
13%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
31
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
18
50%
5
45%
6
43%
2
25%
16
46%
15
44%
_
_
_
_
26
49%
5
31%
31
45%
LEVEL 3
34
49%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
44%
5
45%
8
57%
5
63%
16
46%
18
53%
_
_
_
_
26
49%
8
50%
34
49%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
1
9%
0
0%
0
0%
2
6%
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
3
19%
3
4%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 660
All Students
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
25
38%
LEVEL 3
38
58%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
15
43%
LEVEL 3
20
57%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
8
50%
LEVEL 3
7
44%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
11
73%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Female
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
17
43%
LEVEL 3
21
53%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
8
31%
LEVEL 3
17
65%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
17
41%
LEVEL 3
23
56%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
8
32%
LEVEL 3
15
60%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
2
3%
LEVEL 2
25
38%
LEVEL 3
38
58%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
62
4
2
2
35
11
16
15
40
26
64
2
41
25
66
PROFICIENT
59%
_%
_%
_%
_%
57%
_%
44%
80%
55%
65%
_%
_%
56%
64%
59%
LEVEL 1
2
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
1
6%
1
7%
1
3%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
1
4%
2
3%
LEVEL 2
25
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
43%
_
_
8
50%
2
13%
17
43%
8
31%
_
_
_
_
17
41%
8
32%
25
38%
LEVEL 3
38
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
57%
_
_
7
44%
11
73%
21
53%
17
65%
_
_
_
_
23
56%
15
60%
38
58%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
7%
1
3%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
4%
1
2%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 679
All Students
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
13
54%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
White
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
23%
LEVEL 3
8
62%
LEVEL 4
2
15%
Male
PROFICIENT
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
LEVEL 3
13
54%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
24
20
4
3
14
5
2
5
13
11
21
3
20
4
24
PROFICIENT
63%
_%
_%
_%
57%
100%
_%
40%
77%
45%
_%
_%
_%
_%
63%
LEVEL 1
1
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
1
20%
0
0%
1
9%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
4%
LEVEL 2
8
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
43%
0
0%
_
_
2
40%
3
23%
5
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
8
33%
LEVEL 3
13
54%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
43%
5
100%
_
_
2
40%
8
62%
5
45%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
13
54%
LEVEL 4
2
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
14%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
2
15%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
8%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 690
All Students
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
14
32%
LEVEL 4
18
41%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
35%
LEVEL 3
7
35%
LEVEL 4
6
30%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
3
25%
LEVEL 4
8
67%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
3
25%
LEVEL 3
4
33%
LEVEL 4
4
33%
Female
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
8
32%
LEVEL 4
11
44%
Male
PROFICIENT
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
6
32%
LEVEL 3
6
32%
LEVEL 4
7
37%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
9
23%
LEVEL 3
12
31%
LEVEL 4
18
46%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
1
20%
LEVEL 2
2
40%
LEVEL 3
2
40%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
8
28%
LEVEL 3
10
34%
LEVEL 4
10
34%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
3
20%
LEVEL 3
4
27%
LEVEL 4
8
53%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
LEVEL 3
14
32%
LEVEL 4
18
41%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
44
41
3
1
20
11
12
12
25
19
39
5
29
15
44
PROFICIENT
73%
_%
_%
_%
65%
_%
92%
67%
76%
68%
77%
40%
69%
80%
73%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
8%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
1
20%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
11
25%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
35%
_
_
1
8%
3
25%
5
20%
6
32%
9
23%
2
40%
8
28%
3
20%
11
25%
LEVEL 3
14
32%
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
35%
_
_
3
25%
4
33%
8
32%
6
32%
12
31%
2
40%
10
34%
4
27%
14
32%
LEVEL 4
18
41%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
30%
_
_
8
67%
4
33%
11
44%
7
37%
18
46%
0
0%
10
34%
8
53%
18
41%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 676
All Students
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
26
38%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 5
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
2
6%
LEVEL 2
16
44%
LEVEL 3
12
33%
LEVEL 4
6
17%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
6
55%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
White
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
5
36%
LEVEL 3
6
43%
LEVEL 4
2
14%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
1
13%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
4
50%
Female
PROFICIENT
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
4
11%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
12
34%
LEVEL 4
8
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
12
35%
LEVEL 3
14
41%
LEVEL 4
8
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 53
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
19
36%
LEVEL 3
23
43%
LEVEL 4
9
17%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
2
13%
LEVEL 2
4
25%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
7
44%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
4
6%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
26
38%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
66
3
5
3
36
11
14
8
35
34
68
1
53
16
69
PROFICIENT
61%
_%
_%
_%
_%
50%
91%
57%
75%
57%
65%
_%
_%
60%
63%
61%
LEVEL 1
4
6%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
0
0%
1
7%
1
13%
4
11%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
2
4%
2
13%
4
6%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
44%
1
9%
5
36%
1
13%
11
31%
12
35%
_
_
_
_
19
36%
4
25%
23
33%
LEVEL 3
26
38%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
33%
6
55%
6
43%
2
25%
12
34%
14
41%
_
_
_
_
23
43%
3
19%
26
38%
LEVEL 4
16
23%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
17%
4
36%
2
14%
4
50%
8
23%
8
24%
_
_
_
_
9
17%
7
44%
16
23%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 675
All Students
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
34
52%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
16
46%
LEVEL 3
16
46%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
6
38%
LEVEL 3
8
50%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
2
13%
LEVEL 3
10
67%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Female
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 40
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
18
45%
LEVEL 3
19
48%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 26
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
6
23%
LEVEL 3
15
58%
LEVEL 4
4
15%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
14
34%
LEVEL 3
24
59%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
10
40%
LEVEL 3
10
40%
LEVEL 4
3
12%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66
LEVEL 1
3
5%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
LEVEL 3
34
52%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
66
62
4
2
2
35
11
16
15
40
26
64
2
41
25
66
PROFICIENT
59%
_%
_%
_%
_%
51%
_%
56%
80%
50%
73%
_%
_%
63%
52%
59%
LEVEL 1
3
5%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
_
_
1
6%
1
7%
2
5%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
1
2%
2
8%
3
5%
LEVEL 2
24
36%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
46%
_
_
6
38%
2
13%
18
45%
6
23%
_
_
_
_
14
34%
10
40%
24
36%
LEVEL 3
34
52%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
46%
_
_
8
50%
10
67%
19
48%
15
58%
_
_
_
_
24
59%
10
40%
34
52%
LEVEL 4
5
8%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
_
_
1
6%
2
13%
1
3%
4
15%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
3
12%
5
8%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 68
All Students
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
19
31%
LEVEL 3
31
51%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
3
9%
LEVEL 2
12
36%
LEVEL 3
16
48%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
1
6%
LEVEL 2
6
38%
LEVEL 3
6
38%
LEVEL 4
3
19%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
8%
LEVEL 3
9
75%
LEVEL 4
2
17%
Female
PROFICIENT
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
3
8%
LEVEL 2
14
39%
LEVEL 3
18
50%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 25
LEVEL 1
1
4%
LEVEL 2
5
20%
LEVEL 3
13
52%
LEVEL 4
6
24%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 60
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38
LEVEL 1
2
5%
LEVEL 2
12
32%
LEVEL 3
22
58%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
2
9%
LEVEL 2
7
30%
LEVEL 3
9
39%
LEVEL 4
5
22%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
4
7%
LEVEL 2
19
31%
LEVEL 3
31
51%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
61
57
4
2
1
33
9
16
12
36
25
60
1
38
23
61
PROFICIENT
62%
_%
_%
_%
_%
55%
_%
56%
92%
53%
76%
_%
_%
63%
61%
62%
LEVEL 1
4
7%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
3
9%
_
_
1
6%
0
0%
3
8%
1
4%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
2
9%
4
7%
LEVEL 2
19
31%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
12
36%
_
_
6
38%
1
8%
14
39%
5
20%
_
_
_
_
12
32%
7
30%
19
31%
LEVEL 3
31
51%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
16
48%
_
_
6
38%
9
75%
18
50%
13
52%
_
_
_
_
22
58%
9
39%
31
51%
LEVEL 4
7
11%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
6%
_
_
3
19%
2
17%
1
3%
6
24%
_
_
_
_
2
5%
5
22%
7
11%
Grade 8 Students Taking a Regents Science Test
Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
All Students
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
GROUP
All Students
TOTAL TESTED
2
PROFICIENT
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2010 - 11)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
46%
21%
*%
68%
71%
43%
BASIC
33%
*%
31%
34%
34%
33%
*%
22%
24%
34%
PROFICIENT
26%
*%
32%
15%
17%
34%
*%
8%
5%
19%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
3%
12%
*%
2%
*%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
85
84
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
26
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
32
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
46
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
68
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
85
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
71
Percent Basic
24
Percent Proficient
5
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
84
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
4
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
20%
*%
12%
35%
31%
11%
*%
49%
53%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
30%
48%
49%
43%
*%
39%
39%
46%
PROFICIENT
31%
*%
41%
16%
19%
39%
*%
11%
8%
22%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
17%
1%
1%
7%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
90
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
41
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
49
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
11
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
39
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
11
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
90
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
53
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
3
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
24%
*%
17%
37%
38%
14%
*%
59%
79%
34%
BASIC
41%
*%
33%
45%
42%
40%
*%
33%
20%
42%
PROFICIENT
31%
*%
44%
17%
19%
40%
*%
8%
1%
22%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
6%
1%
1%
6%
*%
*%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
84
77
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
24
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
17
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
44
Percent Advanced
6
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
37
Percent Basic
45
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
38
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
19
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
6
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
84
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
79
Percent Basic
20
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
77
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
34
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
22
Percent Advanced
2
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
30%
*%
14%
47%
49%
18%
*%
64%
81%
43%
BASIC
40%
*%
31%
40%
38%
42%
*%
31%
18%
39%
PROFICIENT
23%
*%
34%
12%
12%
31%
*%
4%
1%
15%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
21%
1%
1%
9%
*%
1%
*%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
91
92
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
30
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
23
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
14
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
21
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
47
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
12
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
91
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
81
Percent Basic
18
Percent Proficient
1
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
92
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
39
76%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
24
80%
LEVEL 4
6
20%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
73%
LEVEL 4
2
18%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
23
77%
LEVEL 4
7
23%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
39
76%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
27
75%
LEVEL 4
9
25%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
80%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
39
76%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
49
2
2
30
9
10
11
30
21
51
36
15
51
PROFICIENT
98%
_%
_%
_%
100%
_%
100%
91%
100%
95%
98%
100%
93%
98%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
9%
0
0%
1
5%
1
2%
0
0%
1
7%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
39
76%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
80%
_
_
7
70%
8
73%
23
77%
16
76%
39
76%
27
75%
12
80%
39
76%
LEVEL 4
11
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
20%
_
_
3
30%
2
18%
7
23%
4
19%
11
22%
9
25%
2
13%
11
22%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
46
90%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
29
97%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
2
20%
LEVEL 3
6
60%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
29
97%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
10%
LEVEL 3
17
81%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
46
90%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
34
94%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
12
80%
LEVEL 4
2
13%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
46
90%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
49
2
2
30
9
10
11
30
21
51
36
15
51
PROFICIENT
94%
_%
_%
_%
100%
_%
70%
100%
97%
90%
94%
94%
93%
94%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
1
10%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
2
20%
0
0%
0
0%
2
10%
2
4%
1
3%
1
7%
2
4%
LEVEL 3
46
90%
_
_
_
_
_
_
29
97%
_
_
6
60%
11
100%
29
97%
17
81%
46
90%
34
94%
12
80%
46
90%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
_
_
1
10%
0
0%
0
0%
2
10%
2
4%
0
0%
2
13%
2
4%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
48
94%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
30
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
90%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
9
82%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
28
93%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
20
95%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
48
94%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
34
94%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
93%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
48
94%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
49
2
2
30
9
10
11
30
21
51
36
15
51
PROFICIENT
98%
_%
_%
_%
100%
_%
100%
91%
97%
100%
98%
97%
100%
98%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
1
9%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
48
94%
_
_
_
_
_
_
30
100%
_
_
9
90%
9
82%
28
93%
20
95%
48
94%
34
94%
14
93%
48
94%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
1
10%
1
9%
1
3%
1
5%
2
4%
1
3%
1
7%
2
4%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
LEVEL 4
7
14%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
24
80%
LEVEL 4
4
13%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
3
30%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
100%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
80%
LEVEL 4
5
17%
Male
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
18
86%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
LEVEL 4
7
14%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
31
86%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
11
73%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
LEVEL 4
7
14%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
49
2
2
30
9
10
11
30
21
51
36
15
51
PROFICIENT
96%
_%
_%
_%
93%
_%
100%
100%
97%
95%
96%
97%
93%
96%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
7%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
1
3%
1
5%
2
4%
1
3%
1
7%
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
80%
_
_
7
70%
11
100%
24
80%
18
86%
42
82%
31
86%
11
73%
42
82%
LEVEL 4
7
14%
_
_
_
_
_
_
4
13%
_
_
3
30%
0
0%
5
17%
2
10%
7
14%
4
11%
3
20%
7
14%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 49
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 2
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
25
83%
LEVEL 4
5
17%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 9
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
White
PROFICIENT
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
1
10%
LEVEL 3
7
70%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
9%
LEVEL 3
10
91%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
2
7%
LEVEL 3
24
80%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
86%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
32
89%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
67%
LEVEL 4
4
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
51
49
2
2
30
9
10
11
30
21
51
36
15
51
PROFICIENT
94%
_%
_%
_%
100%
_%
80%
91%
90%
100%
94%
94%
93%
94%
LEVEL 1
1
2%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
1
10%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
4%
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
1
10%
1
9%
2
7%
0
0%
2
4%
1
3%
1
7%
2
4%
LEVEL 3
42
82%
_
_
_
_
_
_
25
83%
_
_
7
70%
10
91%
24
80%
18
86%
42
82%
32
89%
10
67%
42
82%
LEVEL 4
6
12%
_
_
_
_
_
_
5
17%
_
_
1
10%
0
0%
3
10%
3
14%
6
12%
2
6%
4
27%
6
12%
Regents Examination Results (2011 - 12)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
70
68
2
55
65
93%
_
_
_
_
65
61
87%
_
_
_
_
85
15
21%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 70
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
93%
65
61
87%
85
15
21%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 68
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
144
137
7
55
131
91%
126
92%
5
71%
65
105
73%
100
73%
5
71%
85
5
3%
5
4%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 144
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
131
91%
65
105
73%
85
5
3%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 137
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
126
92%
65
100
73%
85
5
4%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
71%
65
5
71%
85
0
0%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
36
34
2
55
26
72%
_
_
_
_
65
18
50%
_
_
_
_
85
3
8%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
26
72%
65
18
50%
85
3
8%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
26
26
0
55
15
58%
15
58%
0
0%
65
8
31%
8
31%
0
0%
85
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
58%
65
8
31%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
58%
65
8
31%
85
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
100
93
7
55
75
75%
72
77%
3
43%
65
68
68%
65
70%
3
43%
85
8
8%
8
9%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 100
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
75
75%
65
68
68%
85
8
8%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 93
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
72
77%
65
65
70%
85
8
9%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
43%
65
3
43%
85
0
0%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
75
72
3
55
65
87%
_
_
_
_
65
60
80%
_
_
_
_
85
14
19%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
65
87%
65
60
80%
85
14
19%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 72
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
98
92
6
55
80
82%
76
83%
4
67%
65
70
71%
66
72%
4
67%
85
7
7%
7
8%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 98
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
80
82%
65
70
71%
85
7
7%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 92
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
76
83%
65
66
72%
85
7
8%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
67%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
Physical Setting/Earth Science
Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
48
45
3
55
31
65%
_
_
_
_
65
23
48%
_
_
_
_
85
6
13%
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 48
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
65%
65
23
48%
85
6
13%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
12
12
0
55
11
92%
11
92%
0
0%
65
8
67%
8
67%
0
0%
85
2
17%
2
17%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
8
67%
85
2
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
92%
65
8
67%
85
2
17%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 0
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
0
0%
65
0
0%
85
0
0%
Regents Competency Test Results (2011 - 12)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Reading
1
_
Writing
1
_
Global Studies
4
_
Science
4
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
0
_
1
_
1
_
4
_
4
_
All Students
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
General Education
Reading
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
0
Percent Passing
_
Students with Disabilities
Reading
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Writing
Number Tested
1
Percent Passing
_
Global Studies
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
Science
Number Tested
4
Percent Passing
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2011 - 12)
Listening and Speaking (Grades K-1)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
6
5
1
BEGINNING
0%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
17%
_
_
ADVANCED
67%
_
_
PROFICIENT
17%
_
_
Reading and Writing (Grades K-1)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
6
5
1
BEGINNING
50%
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
0%
_
_
ADVANCED
0%
_
_
PROFICIENT
50%
_
_
Listening and Speaking (Grades 2-4)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Reading and Writing (Grades 2-4)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Listening and Speaking (Grades 5-6)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
7
7
BEGINNING
0%
0%
INTERMEDIATE
14%
14%
ADVANCED
57%
57%
PROFICIENT
29%
29%
Reading and Writing (Grades 5-6)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
7
7
BEGINNING
0%
0%
INTERMEDIATE
43%
43%
ADVANCED
43%
43%
PROFICIENT
14%
14%
Listening and Speaking (Grades 7-8)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Reading and Writing (Grades 7-8)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
2
2
BEGINNING
_
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
_
ADVANCED
_
_
PROFICIENT
_
_
Listening and Speaking (Grades 9-12)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
10
10
BEGINNING
0%
0%
INTERMEDIATE
40%
40%
ADVANCED
30%
30%
PROFICIENT
30%
30%
Reading and Writing (Grades 9-12)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
10
10
BEGINNING
10%
10%
INTERMEDIATE
80%
80%
ADVANCED
10%
10%
PROFICIENT
0%
0%
Listening and Speaking (Grades K-1)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
17%
ADVANCED
67%
PROFICIENT
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Reading and Writing (Grades K-1)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
BEGINNING
50%
INTERMEDIATE
0%
ADVANCED
0%
PROFICIENT
50%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Listening and Speaking (Grades 2-4)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Reading and Writing (Grades 2-4)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Listening and Speaking (Grades 5-6)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
14%
ADVANCED
57%
PROFICIENT
29%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
14%
ADVANCED
57%
PROFICIENT
29%
Reading and Writing (Grades 5-6)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
43%
ADVANCED
43%
PROFICIENT
14%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 7
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
43%
ADVANCED
43%
PROFICIENT
14%
Listening and Speaking (Grades 7-8)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Reading and Writing (Grades 7-8)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
BEGINNING
_
INTERMEDIATE
_
ADVANCED
_
PROFICIENT
_
Listening and Speaking (Grades 9-12)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 10
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
40%
ADVANCED
30%
PROFICIENT
30%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 10
BEGINNING
0%
INTERMEDIATE
40%
ADVANCED
30%
PROFICIENT
30%
Reading and Writing (Grades 9-12)
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 10
BEGINNING
10%
INTERMEDIATE
80%
ADVANCED
10%
PROFICIENT
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 10
BEGINNING
10%
INTERMEDIATE
80%
ADVANCED
10%
PROFICIENT
0%
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
7
105
38
9
44
0
14
11
143
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
7
105
38
9
43
0
14
11
143
PI
152
―
155
158
―
151
―
―
―
145
EAMO
142
―
120
116
―
149
―
―
―
125
Safe Harbor Target
142
―
120
20
―
144
―
―
―
125
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
152
EAMO
142
Safe Harbor Target
142
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
105
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
105
PI
155
EAMO
120
Safe Harbor Target
120
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
158
EAMO
116
Safe Harbor Target
20
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
44
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43
PI
151
EAMO
149
Safe Harbor Target
144
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
143
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
143
PI
145
EAMO
125
Safe Harbor Target
125
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
196
98
165
194
159
203
189
192
60
90
113
0
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
195
97
164
193
159
202
188
191
59
90
112
0
202
PI
152
149
151
155
153
152
158
160
169
153
152
―
152
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
196
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
195
PI
152
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
98
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
97
PI
149
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
165
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
164
PI
151
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
194
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
193
PI
155
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
159
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
159
PI
153
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
152
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
189
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
188
PI
158
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
160
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
59
PI
169
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
90
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
90
PI
153
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
113
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
112
PI
152
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
152
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
―
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
7
105
38
9
44
0
14
11
143
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
―
―
100%
―
―
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
7
105
38
9
43
0
14
11
143
PI
162
―
154
184
―
165
―
―
―
162
EAMO
156
―
132
134
―
159
―
―
―
142
Safe Harbor Target
156
―
132
20
―
159
―
―
―
142
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
162
EAMO
156
Safe Harbor Target
156
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
7
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
7
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
105
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
105
PI
154
EAMO
132
Safe Harbor Target
132
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
38
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
184
EAMO
134
Safe Harbor Target
20
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
44
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43
PI
165
EAMO
159
Safe Harbor Target
159
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
14
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
14
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
143
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
143
PI
162
EAMO
142
Safe Harbor Target
142
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
196
98
165
194
159
203
189
192
60
90
113
0
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
195
97
164
193
159
202
188
191
59
90
112
0
202
PI
162
170
157
163
161
162
164
165
161
163
161
―
162
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
196
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
195
PI
162
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
98
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
97
PI
170
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
165
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
164
PI
157
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
194
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
193
PI
163
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
159
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
159
PI
161
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
162
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
189
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
188
PI
164
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
192
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
191
PI
165
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
60
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
59
PI
161
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
90
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
90
PI
163
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
113
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
112
PI
161
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
203
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
202
PI
162
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
65
2
35
11
1
16
0
4
1
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
95%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
62
2
34
10
1
15
0
4
1
38
PI
158
―
147
―
―
―
―
―
―
158
EAMO
167
―
144
―
―
―
―
―
―
152
Progress Target
167
―
1
―
―
―
―
―
―
152
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
65
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
62
PI
158
EAMO
167
Progress Target
167
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
2
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
35
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
34
PI
147
EAMO
144
Progress Target
1
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
16
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
4
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
40
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
38
PI
158
EAMO
152
Progress Target
152
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
63
30
54
64
49
65
61
64
25
26
39
0
65
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
―
98%
97%
96%
97%
97%
97%
―
―
―
―
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
28
52
61
47
62
58
61
24
26
36
0
62
PI
157
―
152
157
160
158
155
161
―
―
147
―
158
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
63
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60
PI
157
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
30
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
28
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
54
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
52
PI
152
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
64
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
61
PI
157
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
49
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
96%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47
PI
160
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
65
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
62
PI
158
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
61
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
58
PI
155
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
64
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
61
PI
161
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
25
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
24
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
26
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
26
PI
―
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
39
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
36
PI
147
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
65
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
62
PI
158
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
49
0
28
9
2
10
0
2
0
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
0
26
8
2
10
0
2
0
32
PI
157
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
159
EAMO
145
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
124
Safe Harbor Target
145
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
124
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
157
EAMO
145
Safe Harbor Target
145
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
159
EAMO
124
Safe Harbor Target
124
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
49
21
40
47
39
49
47
49
15
22
27
0
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
20
38
44
36
46
44
46
14
20
26
0
46
PI
157
―
161
157
158
157
161
157
―
―
―
―
157
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
157
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
21
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
20
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
161
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
157
Not White
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
158
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
157
General Education
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
161
English Proficient
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
157
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
22
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
20
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
157
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2008 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
49
0
28
9
2
10
0
2
0
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
0
26
8
2
10
0
2
0
32
PI
111
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
109
EAMO
122
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
98
Safe Harbor Target
112
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
98
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
111
EAMO
122
Safe Harbor Target
112
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
28
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
9
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
8
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
10
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
10
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
2
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
2
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
34
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
109
EAMO
98
Safe Harbor Target
98
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
49
21
40
47
39
49
47
49
15
22
27
0
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
―
100%
100%
100%
―
―
―
―
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
20
38
44
36
46
44
46
14
20
26
0
46
PI
111
―
113
111
117
111
114
111
―
―
―
―
111
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
111
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
21
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
20
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
40
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
38
PI
113
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
111
Not White
12th Graders
39
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
36
PI
117
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
111
General Education
12th Graders
47
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
44
PI
114
English Proficient
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
111
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
14
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
22
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
20
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
27
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
26
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
49
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
100%
2008 Accountability Cohort Members
46
PI
111
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2008 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
152
―
155
158
―
151
―
―
―
145
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
162
―
154
184
―
165
―
―
―
162
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
159
Secondary-Level MATH PI
111
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
109
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
146
0
155
171
0
158
0
0
0
144
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
152
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
162
Secondary-Level ELA PI
157
Secondary-Level MATH PI
111
Unweighted Combined PI
146
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
155
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
154
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
155
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
158
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
184
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
171
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
151
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
165
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
158
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
145
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
162
Secondary-Level ELA PI
159
Secondary-Level MATH PI
109
Unweighted Combined PI
144
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
YES
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
―
27
8
1
10
―
―
0
36
Graduation Rate
93%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
94%
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
Graduation Rate
93%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
―
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
27
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
8
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
―
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
―
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53
1
34
4
―
13
1
2
0
36
Graduation Rate
96%
―
100%
―
―
―
―
―
―
94%
State Standard
80%
―
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
Progress Target
80%
―
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
80%
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53
Graduation Rate
96%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
34
Graduation Rate
100%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
4
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
―
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
1
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
94%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
19
38
45
36
46
46
46
10
23
23
0
46
Graduation Rate
93%
―
92%
93%
92%
93%
93%
93%
―
―
―
―
93%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2006 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52
19
49
53
40
52
51
53
17
30
23
0
53
Graduation Rate
98%
―
96%
96%
98%
96%
96%
96%
―
97%
―
―
96%
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Black or African American
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
19
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
38
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
45
Graduation Rate
93%
Not White
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
36
Graduation Rate
92%
Not Multiracial
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
Graduation Rate
93%
General Education
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
Graduation Rate
93%
English Proficient
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
Graduation Rate
93%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2007 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
46
Graduation Rate
93%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Black or African American
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
19
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
49
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53
Graduation Rate
96%
Not White
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
40
Graduation Rate
98%
Not Multiracial
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
52
Graduation Rate
96%
General Education
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
51
Graduation Rate
96%
English Proficient
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53
Graduation Rate
96%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
30
Graduation Rate
97%
Female
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
23
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2006 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
53
Graduation Rate
96%
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2007 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2011 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
9%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in NY State Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
9%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
