HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CS - School Report Card Data [2014 - 15]
The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students. Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules
HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CS ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 ENROLLMENT
798
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
358
45%
FEMALE
440
55%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
GROUP
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
HISPANIC OR LATINO
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
WHITE
TOTAL
3
524
265
3
3
PERCENT
0%
66%
33%
0%
0%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
31
4%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
140
18%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
603
76%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
GROUP
K (FULL DAY)
1ST GRADE
2ND GRADE
5TH GRADE
6TH GRADE
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
7TH GRADE
8TH GRADE
9TH GRADE
10TH GRADE
11TH GRADE
12TH GRADE
TOTAL
119
105
106
72
65
2
56
71
71
54
44
33
PERCENT
15%
13%
13%
9%
8%
0%
7%
9%
9%
7%
6%
4%
HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CS ENROLLMENT (2014 - 15)
K-12 Enrollment: 798
ENROLLMENT BY GENDER
MALE
358
45%
FEMALE
440
55%
ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE
3
0%
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN
524
66%
HISPANIC OR LATINO
265
33%
ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER
3
0%
WHITE
3
0%
OTHER GROUPS
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
31
4%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
140
18%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
603
76%
ENROLLMENT BY GRADE
K (FULL DAY)
119
15%
1ST GRADE
105
13%
2ND GRADE
106
13%
5TH GRADE
72
9%
6TH GRADE
65
8%
UNGRADED ELEMENTARY
2
0%
7TH GRADE
56
7%
8TH GRADE
71
9%
9TH GRADE
71
9%
10TH GRADE
54
7%
11TH GRADE
44
6%
12TH GRADE
33
4%
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
25
24
23
24
22
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
25
Grade 8 English
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
23
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
25
24
23
24
22
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
25
Grade 8 English
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
23
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
25
24
23
24
22
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
25
Grade 8 English
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
23
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
25
24
23
24
22
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
25
Grade 8 English
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
23
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
25
24
23
24
22
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
25
Grade 8 English
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
23
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Common Branch
Grade 8 English
Grade 8 Mathematics
Grade 8 Science
Grade 10 English
Grade 10 Social Studies
CLASS SIZE
25
24
23
24
22
23
Average Class Size (2014 - 15)
Common Branch
25
Grade 8 English
24
Grade 8 Mathematics
23
Grade 8 Science
24
Grade 10 English
22
Grade 10 Social Studies
23
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH
541
68%
ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH
60
8%
Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2014 - 15)
Eligible for Free Lunch
541
68%
Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch
60
8%
ATTENDANCE (2013 - 14)
ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE
94%
Attendance (2013 - 14)
Annual Attendance Rate
94%
STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2013 - 14)
49
7%
Student Suspensions (2013 - 14)
Student Suspensions
49
7%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
27%
TURNOVER RATE OF ALL TEACHERS
31%
Teacher Turnover Rate (2013-14 to 2014-15)
Turnover Rate of Teachers with Fewer Than Five Years of Experience
27%
Turnover Rate of All Teachers
31%
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
GROUP
PRINCIPALS
ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS
OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PARAPROFESSIONALS
STAFF
4
0
37
0
Staff Counts (2014 - 15)
Principals
4
Assistant Principals
0
Other Professional Staff
37
Paraprofessionals
0
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS
92
PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE
20%
PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE
20%
PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
20%
PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE
8%
TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES
168
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
20%
Total Number of Classes
244
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
16%
Teacher Qualifications (2014 - 15)
TOTAL TEACHERS: 92
Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate
20%
Percent Teaching Out of Certification
20%
Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience
20%
Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate
8%
Total Number of Core Classes
168
Percent Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers in This School
20%
Total Number of Classes
244
Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification
16%
High School Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
32
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
32
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
31
97%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
1
3%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
3%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
32
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
32
Regents Diploma
31
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
32
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
32
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
31
97%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
1
3%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
3%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
32
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
32
Regents Diploma
31
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
32
_
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
32
_
_
REGENTS DIPLOMA
31
97%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION
1
3%
_
_
_
_
REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
LOCAL DIPLOMAS
1
3%
_
_
_
_
COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
All Students
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
32
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
32
Regents Diploma
31
97%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
1
3%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
0
0%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
1
3%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
0
0%
of Completers
General Education
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Students with Disabilities
COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)
_
Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)
_
Regents Diploma
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with Advanced Designation
_
_%
of Graduates
Regents with CTE Endorsement
_
_%
of Graduates
Local Diplomas
_
_%
of Graduates
Commencement Credentials
_
_%
of Completers
Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2014 - 15)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
1
3%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
3
9%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
28
88%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
1
3%
To Two-Year College
3
9%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
28
88%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
1
3%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
3
9%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
28
88%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
1
3%
To Two-Year College
3
9%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
28
88%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE
1
3%
_
_
_
_
TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE
3
9%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO THE MILITARY
0
0%
_
_
_
_
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TO EMPLOYMENT
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO ADULT SERVICES
0
0%
_
_
_
_
TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS
0
0%
_
_
_
_
PLANS UNKNOWN
28
88%
_
_
_
_
All Students
To Four-Year College
1
3%
To Two-Year College
3
9%
To Other Post-Secondary
0
0%
To the Military
0
0%
To Employment
0
0%
To Adult Services
0
0%
To Other Known Plans
0
0%
Plan Unknown
28
88%
General Education
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Students with Disabilities
To Four-Year College
_
_
To Two-Year College
_
_
To Other Post-Secondary
_
_
To the Military
_
_
To Employment
_
_
To Adult Services
_
_
To Other Known Plans
_
_
Plan Unknown
_
_
Grade 5 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 280
All Students
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
42
58%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51
LEVEL 1
28
55%
LEVEL 2
20
39%
LEVEL 3
3
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
14
67%
LEVEL 2
7
33%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39
LEVEL 1
28
72%
LEVEL 2
10
26%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
14
42%
LEVEL 2
17
52%
LEVEL 3
2
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
19
51%
LEVEL 2
16
43%
LEVEL 3
2
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
23
66%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
35
55%
LEVEL 2
26
41%
LEVEL 3
3
5%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
7
88%
LEVEL 2
1
13%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
33
57%
LEVEL 2
23
40%
LEVEL 3
2
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
9
64%
LEVEL 2
4
29%
LEVEL 3
1
7%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 72
LEVEL 1
42
58%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
72
51
21
1
39
32
33
37
35
64
8
58
14
72
PROFICIENT
4%
6%
0%
_%
3%
_%
6%
5%
3%
5%
0%
3%
7%
4%
LEVEL 1
42
58%
28
55%
14
67%
_
_
28
72%
_
_
14
42%
19
51%
23
66%
35
55%
7
88%
33
57%
9
64%
42
58%
LEVEL 2
27
38%
20
39%
7
33%
_
_
10
26%
_
_
17
52%
16
43%
11
31%
26
41%
1
13%
23
40%
4
29%
27
38%
LEVEL 3
3
4%
3
6%
0
0%
_
_
1
3%
_
_
2
6%
2
5%
1
3%
3
5%
0
0%
2
3%
1
7%
3
4%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 6 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 289
All Students
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
24
38%
LEVEL 2
27
42%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
14
29%
LEVEL 2
22
46%
LEVEL 3
12
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
10
63%
LEVEL 2
5
31%
LEVEL 3
1
6%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
12
29%
LEVEL 2
23
56%
LEVEL 3
6
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
12
52%
LEVEL 2
4
17%
LEVEL 3
7
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
8
25%
LEVEL 2
16
50%
LEVEL 3
8
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
16
50%
LEVEL 2
11
34%
LEVEL 3
5
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 63
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
20
36%
LEVEL 2
25
45%
LEVEL 3
11
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 64
LEVEL 1
24
38%
LEVEL 2
27
42%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
64
48
16
41
23
32
32
63
1
56
8
64
PROFICIENT
20%
25%
6%
15%
30%
25%
16%
_%
_%
20%
25%
20%
LEVEL 1
24
38%
14
29%
10
63%
12
29%
12
52%
8
25%
16
50%
_
_
_
_
20
36%
4
50%
24
38%
LEVEL 2
27
42%
22
46%
5
31%
23
56%
4
17%
16
50%
11
34%
_
_
_
_
25
45%
2
25%
27
42%
LEVEL 3
13
20%
12
25%
1
6%
6
15%
7
30%
8
25%
5
16%
_
_
_
_
11
20%
2
25%
13
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 7 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 295
All Students
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
17
31%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
General Education
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
13
28%
LEVEL 2
26
57%
LEVEL 3
7
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
4
50%
LEVEL 2
2
25%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
12
35%
LEVEL 2
16
47%
LEVEL 3
6
18%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
5
25%
LEVEL 2
12
60%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
6
26%
LEVEL 2
9
39%
LEVEL 3
8
35%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
11
35%
LEVEL 2
19
61%
LEVEL 3
1
3%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
17
31%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
16
36%
LEVEL 2
21
48%
LEVEL 3
7
16%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
7
70%
LEVEL 3
2
20%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
17
31%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
54
46
8
34
20
23
31
54
44
10
54
PROFICIENT
17%
15%
25%
18%
15%
35%
3%
17%
16%
20%
17%
LEVEL 1
17
31%
13
28%
4
50%
12
35%
5
25%
6
26%
11
35%
17
31%
16
36%
1
10%
17
31%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
26
57%
2
25%
16
47%
12
60%
9
39%
19
61%
28
52%
21
48%
7
70%
28
52%
LEVEL 3
9
17%
7
15%
2
25%
6
18%
3
15%
8
35%
1
3%
9
17%
7
16%
2
20%
9
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Grade 8 English Language Arts
MEAN SCORE: 298
All Students
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
15
22%
LEVEL 2
33
48%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
General Education
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
6
11%
LEVEL 2
30
54%
LEVEL 3
16
29%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
9
69%
LEVEL 2
3
23%
LEVEL 3
1
8%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 48
LEVEL 1
9
19%
LEVEL 2
23
48%
LEVEL 3
13
27%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
6
29%
LEVEL 2
10
48%
LEVEL 3
4
19%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
21
57%
LEVEL 3
9
24%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Male
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
10
31%
LEVEL 2
12
38%
LEVEL 3
8
25%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
15
22%
LEVEL 2
33
48%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58
LEVEL 1
13
22%
LEVEL 2
28
48%
LEVEL 3
14
24%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
2
18%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 69
LEVEL 1
15
22%
LEVEL 2
33
48%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
56
13
48
21
37
32
69
58
11
69
PROFICIENT
30%
36%
8%
33%
24%
30%
31%
30%
29%
36%
30%
LEVEL 1
15
22%
6
11%
9
69%
9
19%
6
29%
5
14%
10
31%
15
22%
13
22%
2
18%
15
22%
LEVEL 2
33
48%
30
54%
3
23%
23
48%
10
48%
21
57%
12
38%
33
48%
28
48%
5
45%
33
48%
LEVEL 3
17
25%
16
29%
1
8%
13
27%
4
19%
9
24%
8
25%
17
25%
14
24%
3
27%
17
25%
LEVEL 4
4
6%
4
7%
0
0%
3
6%
1
5%
2
5%
2
6%
4
6%
3
5%
1
9%
4
6%
Grade 5 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 301
All Students
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
24
34%
LEVEL 2
27
39%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
General Education
PROFICIENT
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50
LEVEL 1
15
30%
LEVEL 2
22
44%
LEVEL 3
10
20%
LEVEL 4
3
6%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
9
45%
LEVEL 2
5
25%
LEVEL 3
6
30%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
American Indian or Alaska Native
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
19
51%
LEVEL 2
12
32%
LEVEL 3
4
11%
LEVEL 4
2
5%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
15
45%
LEVEL 3
12
36%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Female
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37
LEVEL 1
16
43%
LEVEL 2
10
27%
LEVEL 3
8
22%
LEVEL 4
3
8%
Male
PROFICIENT
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33
LEVEL 1
8
24%
LEVEL 2
17
52%
LEVEL 3
8
24%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
21
34%
LEVEL 2
24
39%
LEVEL 3
14
23%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
2
25%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
18
32%
LEVEL 2
21
38%
LEVEL 3
14
25%
LEVEL 4
3
5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14
LEVEL 1
6
43%
LEVEL 2
6
43%
LEVEL 3
2
14%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70
LEVEL 1
24
34%
LEVEL 2
27
39%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
70
50
20
1
37
32
33
37
33
62
8
56
14
70
PROFICIENT
27%
26%
30%
_%
16%
_%
39%
30%
24%
27%
25%
30%
14%
27%
LEVEL 1
24
34%
15
30%
9
45%
_
_
19
51%
_
_
5
15%
16
43%
8
24%
21
34%
3
38%
18
32%
6
43%
24
34%
LEVEL 2
27
39%
22
44%
5
25%
_
_
12
32%
_
_
15
45%
10
27%
17
52%
24
39%
3
38%
21
38%
6
43%
27
39%
LEVEL 3
16
23%
10
20%
6
30%
_
_
4
11%
_
_
12
36%
8
22%
8
24%
14
23%
2
25%
14
25%
2
14%
16
23%
LEVEL 4
3
4%
3
6%
0
0%
_
_
2
5%
_
_
1
3%
3
8%
0
0%
3
5%
0
0%
3
5%
0
0%
3
4%
Grade 6 Mathematics
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
12
19%
LEVEL 2
27
44%
LEVEL 3
17
27%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
General Education
PROFICIENT
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
6
13%
LEVEL 2
20
43%
LEVEL 3
14
30%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16
LEVEL 1
6
38%
LEVEL 2
7
44%
LEVEL 3
3
19%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 41
LEVEL 1
7
17%
LEVEL 2
19
46%
LEVEL 3
14
34%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
5
24%
LEVEL 2
8
38%
LEVEL 3
3
14%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
Female
PROFICIENT
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
4
13%
LEVEL 2
14
44%
LEVEL 3
11
34%
LEVEL 4
3
9%
Male
PROFICIENT
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30
LEVEL 1
8
27%
LEVEL 2
13
43%
LEVEL 3
6
20%
LEVEL 4
3
10%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 61
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
12
22%
LEVEL 2
22
40%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
5
71%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 62
LEVEL 1
12
19%
LEVEL 2
27
44%
LEVEL 3
17
27%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
62
46
16
41
21
32
30
61
1
55
7
62
PROFICIENT
37%
43%
19%
37%
38%
44%
30%
_%
_%
38%
29%
37%
LEVEL 1
12
19%
6
13%
6
38%
7
17%
5
24%
4
13%
8
27%
_
_
_
_
12
22%
0
0%
12
19%
LEVEL 2
27
44%
20
43%
7
44%
19
46%
8
38%
14
44%
13
43%
_
_
_
_
22
40%
5
71%
27
44%
LEVEL 3
17
27%
14
30%
3
19%
14
34%
3
14%
11
34%
6
20%
_
_
_
_
15
27%
2
29%
17
27%
LEVEL 4
6
10%
6
13%
0
0%
1
2%
5
24%
3
9%
3
10%
_
_
_
_
6
11%
0
0%
6
10%
Grade 7 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 316
All Students
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
General Education
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46
LEVEL 1
2
4%
LEVEL 2
25
54%
LEVEL 3
14
30%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8
LEVEL 1
3
38%
LEVEL 2
3
38%
LEVEL 3
1
13%
LEVEL 4
1
13%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34
LEVEL 1
4
12%
LEVEL 2
16
47%
LEVEL 3
10
29%
LEVEL 4
4
12%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
1
5%
LEVEL 2
12
60%
LEVEL 3
5
25%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Female
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23
LEVEL 1
2
9%
LEVEL 2
13
57%
LEVEL 3
3
13%
LEVEL 4
5
22%
Male
PROFICIENT
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31
LEVEL 1
3
10%
LEVEL 2
15
48%
LEVEL 3
12
39%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44
LEVEL 1
4
9%
LEVEL 2
24
55%
LEVEL 3
11
25%
LEVEL 4
5
11%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10
LEVEL 1
1
10%
LEVEL 2
4
40%
LEVEL 3
4
40%
LEVEL 4
1
10%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54
LEVEL 1
5
9%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
54
46
8
34
20
23
31
54
44
10
54
PROFICIENT
39%
41%
25%
41%
35%
35%
42%
39%
36%
50%
39%
LEVEL 1
5
9%
2
4%
3
38%
4
12%
1
5%
2
9%
3
10%
5
9%
4
9%
1
10%
5
9%
LEVEL 2
28
52%
25
54%
3
38%
16
47%
12
60%
13
57%
15
48%
28
52%
24
55%
4
40%
28
52%
LEVEL 3
15
28%
14
30%
1
13%
10
29%
5
25%
3
13%
12
39%
15
28%
11
25%
4
40%
15
28%
LEVEL 4
6
11%
5
11%
1
13%
4
12%
2
10%
5
22%
1
3%
6
11%
5
11%
1
10%
6
11%
Grade 8 Mathematics
Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics. For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.
MEAN SCORE: 308
All Students
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
30
45%
LEVEL 3
18
27%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
General Education
PROFICIENT
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
8
14%
LEVEL 2
25
45%
LEVEL 3
18
32%
LEVEL 4
5
9%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
6
55%
LEVEL 2
5
45%
LEVEL 3
0
0%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
11
23%
LEVEL 2
20
43%
LEVEL 3
15
32%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20
LEVEL 1
3
15%
LEVEL 2
10
50%
LEVEL 3
3
15%
LEVEL 4
4
20%
Female
PROFICIENT
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35
LEVEL 1
7
20%
LEVEL 2
17
49%
LEVEL 3
11
31%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
Male
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
7
22%
LEVEL 2
13
41%
LEVEL 3
7
22%
LEVEL 4
5
16%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
30
45%
LEVEL 3
18
27%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 56
LEVEL 1
11
20%
LEVEL 2
26
46%
LEVEL 3
15
27%
LEVEL 4
4
7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
3
27%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
3
27%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67
LEVEL 1
14
21%
LEVEL 2
30
45%
LEVEL 3
18
27%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
67
56
11
47
20
35
32
67
56
11
67
PROFICIENT
34%
41%
0%
34%
35%
31%
38%
34%
34%
36%
34%
LEVEL 1
14
21%
8
14%
6
55%
11
23%
3
15%
7
20%
7
22%
14
21%
11
20%
3
27%
14
21%
LEVEL 2
30
45%
25
45%
5
45%
20
43%
10
50%
17
49%
13
41%
30
45%
26
46%
4
36%
30
45%
LEVEL 3
18
27%
18
32%
0
0%
15
32%
3
15%
11
31%
7
22%
18
27%
15
27%
3
27%
18
27%
LEVEL 4
5
7%
5
9%
0
0%
1
2%
4
20%
0
0%
5
16%
5
7%
4
7%
1
9%
5
7%
Grade 8 Science
Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test. Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.
MEAN SCORE: 73
All Students
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
14
21%
LEVEL 3
39
57%
LEVEL 4
14
21%
General Education
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 55
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
13%
LEVEL 3
35
64%
LEVEL 4
13
24%
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13
LEVEL 1
1
8%
LEVEL 2
7
54%
LEVEL 3
4
31%
LEVEL 4
1
8%
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 47
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
10
21%
LEVEL 3
26
55%
LEVEL 4
10
21%
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
19%
LEVEL 3
13
62%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
Female
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 36
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
7
19%
LEVEL 3
24
67%
LEVEL 4
4
11%
Male
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
7
22%
LEVEL 3
15
47%
LEVEL 4
10
31%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
14
21%
LEVEL 3
39
57%
LEVEL 4
14
21%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 57
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
10
18%
LEVEL 3
35
61%
LEVEL 4
11
19%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
4
36%
LEVEL 3
4
36%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 68
LEVEL 1
1
1%
LEVEL 2
14
21%
LEVEL 3
39
57%
LEVEL 4
14
21%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
68
55
13
47
21
36
32
68
57
11
68
PROFICIENT
78%
87%
38%
77%
81%
78%
78%
78%
81%
64%
78%
LEVEL 1
1
1%
0
0%
1
8%
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
1%
1
2%
0
0%
1
1%
LEVEL 2
14
21%
7
13%
7
54%
10
21%
4
19%
7
19%
7
22%
14
21%
10
18%
4
36%
14
21%
LEVEL 3
39
57%
35
64%
4
31%
26
55%
13
62%
24
67%
15
47%
39
57%
35
61%
4
36%
39
57%
LEVEL 4
14
21%
13
24%
1
8%
10
21%
4
19%
4
11%
10
31%
14
21%
11
19%
3
27%
14
21%
Statewide Results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: NAEP (2014 - 15)
Grade: 4
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
32%
*%
20%
48%
44%
20%
*%
70%
74%
43%
BASIC
32%
*%
30%
34%
37%
31%
*%
22%
21%
36%
PROFICIENT
27%
*%
33%
15%
17%
37%
*%
7%
4%
18%
ADVANCED
9%
*%
17%
3%
2%
12%
*%
1%
1%
3%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
88
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
32
Percent Basic
32
Percent Proficient
27
Percent Advanced
9
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
17
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
34
Percent Proficient
15
Percent Advanced
3
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
44
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
37
Percent Advanced
12
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
70
Percent Basic
22
Percent Proficient
7
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
74
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
4
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
88
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
43
Percent Basic
36
Percent Proficient
18
Percent Advanced
3
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
21%
*%
12%
40%
28%
12%
*%
49%
56%
29%
BASIC
44%
*%
31%
46%
51%
41%
*%
39%
35%
48%
PROFICIENT
30%
*%
42%
13%
20%
40%
*%
10%
9%
21%
ADVANCED
5%
*%
15%
1%
1%
7%
*%
2%
*%
2%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
91
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
21
Percent Basic
44
Percent Proficient
30
Percent Advanced
5
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
31
Percent Proficient
42
Percent Advanced
15
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
46
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
28
Percent Basic
51
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
1
White
Percent Below Basic
12
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
40
Percent Advanced
7
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
49
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
10
Percent Advanced
2
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
56
Percent Basic
35
Percent Proficient
9
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
91
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
29
Percent Basic
48
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
2
Grade: 8
Reading
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
27%
*%
19%
42%
35%
18%
*%
59%
78%
36%
BASIC
40%
*%
39%
41%
43%
39%
*%
33%
19%
42%
PROFICIENT
29%
*%
34%
16%
20%
38%
*%
8%
3%
21%
ADVANCED
4%
*%
8%
1%
2%
5%
*%
*%
*%
1%
PARTICIPATION RATE
98
89
Reading
All Students
Percent Below Basic
27
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
29
Percent Advanced
4
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
19
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
34
Percent Advanced
8
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
42
Percent Basic
41
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
1
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
35
Percent Basic
43
Percent Proficient
20
Percent Advanced
2
White
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
38
Percent Advanced
5
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
59
Percent Basic
33
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
98
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
78
Percent Basic
19
Percent Proficient
3
Percent Advanced
*
Participation Rate
89
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
36
Percent Basic
42
Percent Proficient
21
Percent Advanced
1
Mathematics
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
White
Multiracial
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
BELOW BASIC
31%
*%
18%
48%
41%
20%
*%
64%
72%
40%
BASIC
38%
*%
30%
37%
40%
40%
*%
27%
21%
39%
PROFICIENT
24%
*%
33%
13%
16%
31%
*%
8%
6%
17%
ADVANCED
7%
*%
19%
2%
3%
9%
*%
1%
1%
4%
PARTICIPATION RATE
99
94
Mathematics
All Students
Percent Below Basic
31
Percent Basic
38
Percent Proficient
24
Percent Advanced
7
American Indian or Alaska Native
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Percent Below Basic
18
Percent Basic
30
Percent Proficient
33
Percent Advanced
19
Black or African American
Percent Below Basic
48
Percent Basic
37
Percent Proficient
13
Percent Advanced
2
Hispanic or Latino
Percent Below Basic
41
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
16
Percent Advanced
3
White
Percent Below Basic
20
Percent Basic
40
Percent Proficient
31
Percent Advanced
9
Multiracial
Percent Below Basic
*
Percent Basic
*
Percent Proficient
*
Percent Advanced
*
Students with Disabilities
Percent Below Basic
64
Percent Basic
27
Percent Proficient
8
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
99
Limited English Proficient
Percent Below Basic
72
Percent Basic
21
Percent Proficient
6
Percent Advanced
1
Participation Rate
94
Economically Disadvantaged
Percent Below Basic
40
Percent Basic
39
Percent Proficient
17
Percent Advanced
4
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
47%
LEVEL 4
17
53%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
47%
LEVEL 4
17
53%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
10
48%
LEVEL 4
11
52%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
6
55%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
47%
LEVEL 4
17
53%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
8
53%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
47%
LEVEL 4
9
53%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
47%
LEVEL 4
17
53%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
32
29
3
28
4
32
21
11
32
15
17
32
PROFICIENT
100%
_%
_%
_%
_%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
15
47%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
15
47%
10
48%
5
45%
15
47%
7
47%
8
47%
15
47%
LEVEL 4
17
53%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
17
53%
11
52%
6
55%
17
53%
8
53%
9
53%
17
53%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
9
28%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
9
28%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
5
24%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
9
28%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
11
73%
LEVEL 4
4
27%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
71%
LEVEL 4
5
29%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
9
28%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
32
29
3
28
4
32
21
11
32
15
17
32
PROFICIENT
100%
_%
_%
_%
_%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
72%
16
76%
7
64%
23
72%
11
73%
12
71%
23
72%
LEVEL 4
9
28%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
9
28%
5
24%
4
36%
9
28%
4
27%
5
29%
9
28%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
81%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
81%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
Female
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
18
86%
LEVEL 4
3
14%
Male
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
8
73%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
81%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
12
80%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
14
82%
LEVEL 4
3
18%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
81%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
32
29
3
28
4
32
21
11
32
15
17
32
PROFICIENT
100%
_%
_%
_%
_%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 3
26
81%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
26
81%
18
86%
8
73%
26
81%
12
80%
14
82%
26
81%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
19%
3
14%
3
27%
6
19%
3
20%
3
18%
6
19%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
7
22%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
7
22%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
16
76%
LEVEL 4
4
19%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
7
64%
LEVEL 4
3
27%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
7
22%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
10
67%
LEVEL 4
3
20%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
13
76%
LEVEL 4
4
24%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
LEVEL 4
7
22%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
32
29
3
28
4
32
21
11
32
15
17
32
PROFICIENT
94%
_%
_%
_%
_%
94%
95%
91%
94%
87%
100%
94%
LEVEL 1
0
0%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
5%
0
0%
1
3%
1
7%
0
0%
1
3%
LEVEL 3
23
72%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
23
72%
16
76%
7
64%
23
72%
10
67%
13
76%
23
72%
LEVEL 4
7
22%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
7
22%
4
19%
3
27%
7
22%
3
20%
4
24%
7
22%
Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction
All Students
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
75%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
General Education
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 29
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Students with Disabilities
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 3
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Black or African American
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 28
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Hispanic or Latino
PROFICIENT
_%
TOTAL TESTED: 4
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Small Group Total
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
75%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
Female
PROFICIENT
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
18
86%
LEVEL 4
2
10%
Male
PROFICIENT
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11
LEVEL 1
1
9%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
6
55%
LEVEL 4
4
36%
Non-English Language Learners
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
75%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15
LEVEL 1
1
7%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
8
53%
LEVEL 4
5
33%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
PROFICIENT
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 17
LEVEL 1
0
0%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
16
94%
LEVEL 4
1
6%
Not Migrant
PROFICIENT
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 32
LEVEL 1
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
75%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
32
29
3
28
4
32
21
11
32
15
17
32
PROFICIENT
94%
_%
_%
_%
_%
94%
95%
91%
94%
87%
100%
94%
LEVEL 1
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
0
0%
1
9%
1
3%
1
7%
0
0%
1
3%
LEVEL 2
1
3%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
1
3%
1
5%
0
0%
1
3%
1
7%
0
0%
1
3%
LEVEL 3
24
75%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
24
75%
18
86%
6
55%
24
75%
8
53%
16
94%
24
75%
LEVEL 4
6
19%
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
6
19%
2
10%
4
36%
6
19%
5
33%
1
6%
6
19%
Regents Examination Results (2014 - 15)
Comprehensive English
Regents Comprehensive English
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
45
41
4
2
34
9
11
31
14
45
18
27
45
55
44
98%
_
_
_
_
_
_
33
97%
_
_
11
100%
31
100%
13
93%
44
98%
17
94%
27
100%
44
98%
65
43
96%
_
_
_
_
_
_
32
94%
_
_
11
100%
31
100%
12
86%
43
96%
17
94%
26
96%
43
96%
85
26
58%
_
_
_
_
_
_
20
59%
_
_
6
55%
22
71%
4
29%
26
58%
9
50%
17
63%
26
58%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
98%
65
43
96%
85
26
58%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
97%
65
32
94%
85
20
59%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
100%
65
11
100%
85
6
55%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 31
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
31
100%
65
31
100%
85
22
71%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
93%
65
12
86%
85
4
29%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
98%
65
43
96%
85
26
58%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
17
94%
65
17
94%
85
9
50%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 27
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
100%
65
26
96%
85
17
63%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 45
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
98%
65
43
96%
85
26
58%
English Language Arts (Common Core)
English Language Arts (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
97
90
7
1
75
21
22
63
34
97
47
50
97
LEVEL 1
6
6%
5
6%
1
14%
_
_
3
4%
_
_
3
14%
1
2%
5
15%
6
6%
3
6%
3
6%
6
6%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
6
7%
3
43%
_
_
7
9%
_
_
2
9%
2
3%
7
21%
9
9%
3
6%
6
12%
9
9%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
25
28%
2
29%
_
_
23
31%
_
_
4
18%
15
24%
12
35%
27
28%
18
38%
9
18%
27
28%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
16
18%
0
0%
_
_
11
15%
_
_
5
23%
14
22%
2
6%
16
16%
6
13%
10
20%
16
16%
LEVEL 5
39
40%
38
42%
1
14%
_
_
31
41%
_
_
8
36%
31
49%
8
24%
39
40%
17
36%
22
44%
39
40%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
LEVEL 5
39
40%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 90
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
6%
LEVEL 2
6
7%
LEVEL 3
25
28%
LEVEL 4
16
18%
LEVEL 5
38
42%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
14%
LEVEL 2
3
43%
LEVEL 3
2
29%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
1
14%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 75
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
4%
LEVEL 2
7
9%
LEVEL 3
23
31%
LEVEL 4
11
15%
LEVEL 5
31
41%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 21
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
14%
LEVEL 2
2
9%
LEVEL 3
4
18%
LEVEL 4
5
23%
LEVEL 5
8
36%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 63
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
1
2%
LEVEL 2
2
3%
LEVEL 3
15
24%
LEVEL 4
14
22%
LEVEL 5
31
49%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 34
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
15%
LEVEL 2
7
21%
LEVEL 3
12
35%
LEVEL 4
2
6%
LEVEL 5
8
24%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
LEVEL 5
39
40%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 47
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
3
6%
LEVEL 3
18
38%
LEVEL 4
6
13%
LEVEL 5
17
36%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 50
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
6%
LEVEL 2
6
12%
LEVEL 3
9
18%
LEVEL 4
10
20%
LEVEL 5
22
44%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 97
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
6%
LEVEL 2
9
9%
LEVEL 3
27
28%
LEVEL 4
16
16%
LEVEL 5
39
40%
Integrated Algebra
Regents Integrated Algebra
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
3
2
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Geometry
Regents Geometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
58
52
6
44
14
32
26
58
32
26
58
55
35
60%
32
62%
3
50%
27
61%
8
57%
21
66%
14
54%
35
60%
22
69%
13
50%
35
60%
65
22
38%
20
38%
2
33%
17
39%
5
36%
16
50%
6
23%
22
38%
14
44%
8
31%
22
38%
85
1
2%
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
2%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
60%
65
22
38%
85
1
2%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 52
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
32
62%
65
20
38%
85
1
2%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
3
50%
65
2
33%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 44
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
27
61%
65
17
39%
85
1
2%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 14
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
57%
65
5
36%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
66%
65
16
50%
85
1
3%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
54%
65
6
23%
85
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
60%
65
22
38%
85
1
2%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 32
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
22
69%
65
14
44%
85
1
3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
13
50%
65
8
31%
85
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
60%
65
22
38%
85
1
2%
Algebra 2/Trigonometry
Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
12
12
1
11
12
9
3
12
7
5
12
55
8
67%
8
67%
_
_
_
_
8
67%
_
_
_
_
8
67%
4
57%
4
80%
8
67%
65
7
58%
7
58%
_
_
_
_
7
58%
_
_
_
_
7
58%
3
43%
4
80%
7
58%
85
2
17%
2
17%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
_
_
_
_
2
17%
1
14%
1
20%
2
17%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
67%
65
7
58%
85
2
17%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
67%
65
7
58%
85
2
17%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
67%
65
7
58%
85
2
17%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 9
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
67%
65
7
58%
85
2
17%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
57%
65
3
43%
85
1
14%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
4
80%
65
4
80%
85
1
20%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
8
67%
65
7
58%
85
2
17%
Algebra I (Common Core)
Algebra I (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
69
57
12
43
26
41
28
69
36
33
69
LEVEL 1
11
16%
6
11%
5
42%
9
21%
2
8%
3
7%
8
29%
11
16%
5
14%
6
18%
11
16%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
18
32%
5
42%
12
28%
11
42%
15
37%
8
29%
23
33%
11
31%
12
36%
23
33%
LEVEL 3
33
48%
31
54%
2
17%
21
49%
12
46%
22
54%
11
39%
33
48%
19
53%
14
42%
33
48%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
2
4%
0
0%
1
2%
1
4%
1
2%
1
4%
2
3%
1
3%
1
3%
2
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
33
48%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 57
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
11%
LEVEL 2
18
32%
LEVEL 3
31
54%
LEVEL 4
2
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
42%
LEVEL 2
5
42%
LEVEL 3
2
17%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 43
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
21%
LEVEL 2
12
28%
LEVEL 3
21
49%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 26
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
2
8%
LEVEL 2
11
42%
LEVEL 3
12
46%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 41
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
3
7%
LEVEL 2
15
37%
LEVEL 3
22
54%
LEVEL 4
1
2%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
8
29%
LEVEL 2
8
29%
LEVEL 3
11
39%
LEVEL 4
1
4%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
33
48%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
14%
LEVEL 2
11
31%
LEVEL 3
19
53%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 33
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
18%
LEVEL 2
12
36%
LEVEL 3
14
42%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 69
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
16%
LEVEL 2
23
33%
LEVEL 3
33
48%
LEVEL 4
2
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Geometry (Common Core)
Geometry (Common Core)
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
39
36
3
28
11
24
15
39
22
17
39
LEVEL 1
16
41%
_
_
_
_
11
39%
5
45%
10
42%
6
40%
16
41%
9
41%
7
41%
16
41%
LEVEL 2
4
10%
_
_
_
_
4
14%
0
0%
3
13%
1
7%
4
10%
1
5%
3
18%
4
10%
LEVEL 3
18
46%
_
_
_
_
13
46%
5
45%
11
46%
7
47%
18
46%
11
50%
7
41%
18
46%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
1
9%
0
0%
1
7%
1
3%
1
5%
0
0%
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
41%
LEVEL 2
4
10%
LEVEL 3
18
46%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 36
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
_
_%
LEVEL 2
_
_%
LEVEL 3
_
_%
LEVEL 4
_
_%
LEVEL 5
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
11
39%
LEVEL 2
4
14%
LEVEL 3
13
46%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 11
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
5
45%
LEVEL 2
0
0%
LEVEL 3
5
45%
LEVEL 4
1
9%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 24
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
10
42%
LEVEL 2
3
13%
LEVEL 3
11
46%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 15
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
6
40%
LEVEL 2
1
7%
LEVEL 3
7
47%
LEVEL 4
1
7%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
41%
LEVEL 2
4
10%
LEVEL 3
18
46%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 22
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
9
41%
LEVEL 2
1
5%
LEVEL 3
11
50%
LEVEL 4
1
5%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 17
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
7
41%
LEVEL 2
3
18%
LEVEL 3
7
41%
LEVEL 4
0
0%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at
LEVEL 1
16
41%
LEVEL 2
4
10%
LEVEL 3
18
46%
LEVEL 4
1
3%
LEVEL 5
0
0%
Global History and Geography
Regents Global History and Geography
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
77
71
6
58
19
49
28
77
39
38
77
55
67
87%
62
87%
5
83%
53
91%
14
74%
44
90%
23
82%
67
87%
34
87%
33
87%
67
87%
65
54
70%
50
70%
4
67%
42
72%
12
63%
38
78%
16
57%
54
70%
27
69%
27
71%
54
70%
85
9
12%
9
13%
0
0%
9
16%
0
0%
7
14%
2
7%
9
12%
6
15%
3
8%
9
12%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
87%
65
54
70%
85
9
12%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 71
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
62
87%
65
50
70%
85
9
13%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
5
83%
65
4
67%
85
0
0%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 58
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
53
91%
65
42
72%
85
9
16%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 19
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
14
74%
65
12
63%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 49
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
90%
65
38
78%
85
7
14%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 28
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
23
82%
65
16
57%
85
2
7%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
87%
65
54
70%
85
9
12%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 39
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
34
87%
65
27
69%
85
6
15%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 38
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
33
87%
65
27
71%
85
3
8%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 77
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
67
87%
65
54
70%
85
9
12%
U.S. History & Government
Regents U.S. History & Government
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
53
46
7
1
40
12
13
35
18
53
23
30
53
55
50
94%
44
96%
6
86%
_
_
39
98%
_
_
11
85%
35
100%
15
83%
50
94%
21
91%
29
97%
50
94%
65
48
91%
43
93%
5
71%
_
_
37
93%
_
_
11
85%
33
94%
15
83%
48
91%
20
87%
28
93%
48
91%
85
14
26%
13
28%
1
14%
_
_
12
30%
_
_
2
15%
10
29%
4
22%
14
26%
7
30%
7
23%
14
26%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
94%
65
48
91%
85
14
26%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 46
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
44
96%
65
43
93%
85
13
28%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 7
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
6
86%
65
5
71%
85
1
14%
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 40
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
39
98%
65
37
93%
85
12
30%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 12
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 13
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
11
85%
65
11
85%
85
2
15%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 35
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
35
100%
65
33
94%
85
10
29%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 18
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
15
83%
65
15
83%
85
4
22%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
94%
65
48
91%
85
14
26%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 23
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
21
91%
65
20
87%
85
7
30%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 30
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
29
97%
65
28
93%
85
7
23%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 53
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
50
94%
65
48
91%
85
14
26%
Living Environment
Regents Living Environment
GROUP
All Students
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Small Group Total
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
4
4
3
1
4
1
3
4
1
3
4
55
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
65
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
85
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Hispanic or Latino
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Small Group Total
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 3
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Physical Setting/Chemistry
Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
Black or African American
Female
Male
Non-English Language Learners
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED
6
5
1
6
5
1
6
4
2
6
55
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
33%
_
_
_
_
2
33%
65
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
17%
_
_
_
_
1
17%
85
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
_
_
_
_
0
0%
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Black or African American
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Female
TOTAL TESTED: 5
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Male
TOTAL TESTED: 1
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Non-English Language Learners
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 4
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
TOTAL TESTED: 2
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
_
_%
65
_
_%
85
_
_%
Not Migrant
TOTAL TESTED: 6
Number/Percent scoring at or above
55
2
33%
65
1
17%
85
0
0%
New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Results (2014 - 15)
GROUP
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 Math
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
PROFICIENT
_%
_%
LEVEL 1
_
_
LEVEL 2
_
_
LEVEL 3
_
_
LEVEL 4
_
_
Grade 6 ELA
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
Grade 6 Math
PROFICIENT
— _%
TOTAL TESTED: 1
LEVEL 1
_
LEVEL 2
_
LEVEL 3
_
LEVEL 4
_
New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Results (2014 - 15)
Kindergarten
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
14
8
6
ENTERING
7%
0%
17%
EMERGING
14%
13%
17%
TRANSITIONING
14%
25%
0%
EXPANDING
64%
63%
67%
COMMANDING
0%
0%
0%
Grade 2
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
6
5
1
ENTERING
0%
_
_
EMERGING
0%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
17%
_
_
EXPANDING
83%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 5
GROUP
All Students
General Education
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED
8
4
4
ENTERING
13%
_
_
EMERGING
13%
_
_
TRANSITIONING
0%
_
_
EXPANDING
75%
_
_
COMMANDING
0%
_
_
Grade 6
GROUP
All Students
General Education
TOTAL TESTED
1
1
ENTERING
_
_
EMERGING
_
_
TRANSITIONING
_
_
EXPANDING
_
_
COMMANDING
_
_
Kindergarten
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 14
ENTERING
7%
EMERGING
14%
TRANSITIONING
14%
EXPANDING
64%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
13%
TRANSITIONING
25%
EXPANDING
63%
COMMANDING
0%
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
17%
EMERGING
17%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
67%
COMMANDING
0%
Grade 2
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 6
ENTERING
0%
EMERGING
0%
TRANSITIONING
17%
EXPANDING
83%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 5
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 5
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 8
ENTERING
13%
EMERGING
13%
TRANSITIONING
0%
EXPANDING
75%
COMMANDING
0%
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Students with Disabilities
TOTAL TESTED: 4
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Grade 6
All Students
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
General Education
TOTAL TESTED: 1
ENTERING
_
EMERGING
_
TRANSITIONING
_
EXPANDING
_
COMMANDING
_
Elementary/Middle-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: NO
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
NO
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
1
163
96
0
0
0
59
9
217
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
―
100%
100%
―
―
―
100%
―
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
NO
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
1
163
96
0
0
0
60✝
9
217
PI
80
―
81
80
―
―
―
47✝
―
80
EAMO
90
―
70
73
―
―
―
48
―
76
Safe Harbor Target
90
―
70
73
―
―
―
48
―
76
All Students
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
80
EAMO
90
Safe Harbor Target
90
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
163
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
163
PI
81
EAMO
70
Safe Harbor Target
70
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
96
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
96
PI
80
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
73
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: NO
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
59
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
NO
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
60✝
PI
47✝
EAMO
48
Safe Harbor Target
48
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
217
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
217
PI
80
EAMO
76
Safe Harbor Target
76
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259
97
164
260
260
260
201
251
43
131
129
0
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
―
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259
97
164
260
260
260
201
251
43
131
129
0
260
PI
81
79
80
80
80
80
91
83
84
68
93
―
80
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
259
PI
81
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
97
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
97
PI
79
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
164
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
164
PI
80
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
80
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
80
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
80
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
201
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
201
PI
91
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
251
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
251
PI
83
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
43
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
43
PI
84
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
131
PI
68
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
129
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
129
PI
93
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
100%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
260
PI
80
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
Tested 95%
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
1
163
96
0
0
0
59
9
217
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
―
98%
97%
―
―
―
95%
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
YES
YES
―
―
―
YES
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
254
1
160
93
0
0
0
57✝
9
212
PI
113
―
107
122
―
―
―
79✝
―
114
EAMO
87
―
64
71
―
―
―
49
―
73
Safe Harbor Target
87
―
64
71
―
―
―
49
―
73
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
254
PI
113
EAMO
87
Safe Harbor Target
87
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
1
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
1
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
163
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
160
PI
107
EAMO
64
Safe Harbor Target
64
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
96
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
93
PI
122
EAMO
71
Safe Harbor Target
71
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
59
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
95%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57✝
PI
79✝
EAMO
49
Safe Harbor Target
49
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
9
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
9
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
217
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
212
PI
114
EAMO
73
Safe Harbor Target
73
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259
97
164
260
260
260
201
251
43
131
129
0
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
97%
98%
98%
98%
98%
99%
98%
98%
97%
98%
―
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
253
94
161
254
254
254
198
245
42
127
127
0
254
PI
112
122
107
113
113
113
122
114
107
113
112
―
113
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
259
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
253
PI
112
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
97
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
94
PI
122
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
164
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
161
PI
107
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
254
PI
113
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
254
PI
113
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
254
PI
113
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
201
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
198
PI
122
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
251
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
245
PI
114
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
43
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
42
PI
107
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
131
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
97%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
127
PI
113
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
129
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
127
PI
112
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
260
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
254
PI
113
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed. ✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.
Elementary/Middle-Level Science Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested 80%
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
0
48
21
0
0
0
13
0
58
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
98%
―
―
―
―
―
―
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
―
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
0
47
21
0
0
0
13
0
57
PI
176
―
174
―
―
―
―
―
―
179
EAMO
173
―
158
―
―
―
―
―
―
164
Progress Target
166
―
158
―
―
―
―
―
―
164
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
176
EAMO
173
Progress Target
166
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
48
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47
PI
174
EAMO
158
Progress Target
158
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
21
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
13
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
13
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 80%
―
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 80%
YES
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
58
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
PI >= EAMO or Progress Target
YES
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
57
PI
179
EAMO
164
Progress Target
164
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
21
48
69
69
69
56
69
11
32
37
0
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
―
98%
99%
99%
99%
98%
99%
―
―
―
―
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
21
47
68
68
68
55
68
11
32
36
0
68
PI
176
―
174
176
176
176
187
176
―
178
175
―
176
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
176
Not Black or African American
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
21
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
21
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
48
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
47
PI
174
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
176
Not White
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
176
Not Multiracial
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
176
General Education
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
56
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
98%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
55
PI
187
English Proficient
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
176
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
11
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
11
PI
―
Male
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
32
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
32
PI
178
Female
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
37
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
36
PI
175
Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
0
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
―
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
Students Enrolled During the Test Administration Period
69
Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores
99%
Tested Students Enrolled on BEDS Day
68
PI
176
― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolled on BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
36
0
31
5
0
0
0
4
0
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
0
28
4
0
0
0
3
0
15
PI
175
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
EAMO
153
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
153
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
EAMO
153
Safe Harbor Target
153
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
5
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
5
31
36
36
36
32
36
21
14
22
0
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
4
28
32
32
32
29
32
17
11
21
0
32
PI
175
―
―
175
175
175
―
175
―
―
―
―
175
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
5
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not White
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
General Education
12th Graders
32
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
29
PI
―
English Proficient
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
21
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
22
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Tested 95%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
12th graders
36
0
31
5
0
0
0
4
0
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
0
28
4
0
0
0
3
0
15
PI
175
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
EAMO
137
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Safe Harbor Target
137
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP: YES
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
YES
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
EAMO
137
Safe Harbor Target
137
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
5
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
White
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
4
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
3
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP: ―
Tested 95%
―
12th Graders
15
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
15
PI
―
EAMO
―
Safe Harbor Target
―
Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
5
31
36
36
36
32
36
21
14
22
0
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
4
28
32
32
32
29
32
17
11
21
0
32
PI
175
―
―
175
175
175
―
175
―
―
―
―
175
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not Black or African American
12th Graders
5
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
4
PI
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
12th Graders
31
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
28
PI
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not White
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not Multiracial
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
General Education
12th Graders
32
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
29
PI
―
English Proficient
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
Not Economically Disadvantaged
12th Graders
21
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
17
PI
―
Male
12th Graders
14
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
11
PI
―
Female
12th Graders
22
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
21
PI
―
Migrant
12th Graders
0
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
0
PI
―
Not Migrant
12th Graders
36
Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores
―
2011 Accountability Cohort Members
32
PI
175
― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2011 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.
Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
80
―
81
80
―
―
―
47
―
80
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
113
―
107
122
―
―
―
79
―
114
Secondary-Level ELA PI
175
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
175
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI
136
0
94
101
0
0
0
63
0
97
All Students
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
80
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
113
Secondary-Level ELA PI
175
Secondary-Level MATH PI
175
Unweighted Combined PI
136
American Indian or Alaska Native
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Black or African American
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
81
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
107
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
94
Hispanic or Latino
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
80
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
122
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
101
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
White
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Multiracial
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Students With Disabilities
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
47
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
79
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
63
Limited English Proficient
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
―
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
―
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
0
Economically Disadvantaged
Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI
80
Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI
114
Secondary-Level ELA PI
―
Secondary-Level MATH PI
―
Unweighted Combined PI
97
― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.
Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability
All accountability groups made AYP: YES
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
MADE AYP
YES
American Indian or Alaska Native
MADE AYP
―
Black or African American
MADE AYP
―
Hispanic or Latino
MADE AYP
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
MADE AYP
―
White
MADE AYP
―
Multiracial
MADE AYP
―
Students With Disabilities
MADE AYP
―
Limited English Proficient
MADE AYP
―
Economically Disadvantaged
MADE AYP
―
― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
YES
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
0
17
14
0
0
0
3
0
16
Graduation Rate
90%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
State Standard
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
80%
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
State Standard
80%
Progress Target
80%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
3
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability
GROUP
All Students
American Indian or Alaska Native
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
White
Multiracial
Students With Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
0
13
11
0
0
0
2
0
10
Graduation Rate
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
State Standard
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Progress Target
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
All Students
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
American Indian or Alaska Native
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Black or African American
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Hispanic or Latino
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
White
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Multiracial
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Students With Disabilities
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Limited English Proficient
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
Economically Disadvantaged
Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
10
Graduation Rate
―
State Standard
―
Progress Target
―
YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability
GROUP
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
Not Black or African American
Not Hispanic or Latino
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
Not White
Not Multiracial
General Education
English Proficient
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Male
Female
Migrant
Not Migrant
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
14
17
31
31
31
28
31
15
15
16
0
31
Graduation Rate
90%
―
―
90%
90%
90%
―
90%
―
―
―
―
90%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
2009 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
11
13
24
24
24
22
24
14
11
13
0
24
Graduation Rate
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
―
Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Black or African American
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
17
Graduation Rate
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
Not White
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Multiracial
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
General Education
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
28
Graduation Rate
―
English Proficient
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
15
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
16
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2010 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
31
Graduation Rate
90%
Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
Not American Indian or Alaska Native
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Not Black or African American
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
Not Hispanic or Latino
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Not White
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Not Multiracial
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
General Education
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
22
Graduation Rate
―
English Proficient
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
Not Economically Disadvantaged
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
14
Graduation Rate
―
Male
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
11
Graduation Rate
―
Female
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
13
Graduation Rate
―
Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
0
Graduation Rate
―
Not Migrant
2009 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort
24
Graduation Rate
―
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.
Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability
Percentage of 2010 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2014 with:
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
19%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
31%
Percentage in NY State Exceeded Statewide
NO
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (NY State)
19%
Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)
You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.
Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.
If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.
