Skip to Content
Main content

OSSINING UFSD

Special Education School District Data Profile 2015-16

The Special Education School District Data Profile is prepared in accordance with the requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Each State must have a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and purposes of the implementation of IDEA.

The SPP is a six-year plan which describes New York State's performance on 17 indicators. States must report annually to the public on the performance of the State in an Annual Performance Report (APR) and each school district against the State's targets. New York State's SPP and the APR that describe these indicators in detail are available at https://www.nysed.gov/special-education/spp-apr.
The following report reflects only quantifiable data collected by the State. Since performance of a school district in any indicator may be the result of unique circumstances within a district, readers are encouraged to consider information provided by the district's administration in interpreting these data.

Ossining Union Free School District

2015-16

Enrollment and Classification Rate

District Enrollment: 5,318
School-Age Students with Disabilities and Classification Rate

539

10.1%

Preschool Students with Disabilities

79

Indicator 1: Graduation Rate of Students with Disabilities

2011 Total cohort - August 2015

Students with Disabilities and Graduation rate

41

65.9%

State Target

Target Met

55.39% or higher

Yes, met state target

Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rate of Students with Disabilities

2011 Total cohort 4 years later - August 2015

Students with Disabilities and Drop-out Rate

41

2.4%

State Target

Target Met

14% or lower

Yes, met state target

Indicator 3: State Assessments

Participation In and Performance On State Assessments

Grade 3-8 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

562

69%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 3-8 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

562

63%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

44

95%

State Target

Target Met

95%

Yes, met state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

44

98%

State Target

Target Met

95%

Yes, met state target

Performance on State Assessments

Grade 3-8 ELA

Percent at or above level 3

170

13.9%

State Target

Target Met

16%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 3-8 Math

Percent at or above level 3

160

16.7%

State Target

Target Met

16%

Yes, met state target

High School ELA

Percent at or above level 3

38

72.2%

State Target

Target Met

63%

Yes, met state target

High School Math

Percent at or above level 3

38

56.8%

State Target

Target Met

64.5%

No, did not meet state target

Participation in and performance on rate is suppressed if less than 40 students with disabilities are reported as enrolled for participation rate.

Indicator 4A: Suspension Rate

(based on 2014-15 school year data)

Students with Disabilities: 555
Suspension Rate 2015-16

Students with Disabilities Suspended Out-of-School for More than 10 Days and Percentage

5

0.9%

State Threshold

Threshold Met

2.7% or lower

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 4B: Significant Discrepancy by Race and Ethnicity in Suspension Rate

(based on 2014-15 school year data)

Suspension Rate 2015-16

Did the school district have significant discrepancy?

NO

State threshold for 2015-16

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 5: School-age Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilities ages 6-21: 514
Students with 80% or more of the day in a general education program

57.8%

State Target

Target Met

Greater than or equal to 58.8%

No, did not meet state target

Students with 40 to 79% of the day in a general education program

23.5%

State Target

Target Met

No State Target

Not Applicable

Students with Less than 40% of the day in a general education program

15.2%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 20.5%

Yes, met state target

  Students with disabilities in separate settings

3.1%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 5.8%

Yes, met state target

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN OTHER SETTINGS

0.4%

State Target

Target Met

No State Target

Not Applicable

Indicator 6: Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilites: 104
Students with disabilities with measurement A

55.8%

State Target

Target Met

43.5% or higher

Yes, met state target

Students with disabilities with measurement B

7.7%

State Target

Target Met

21.0% or lower

Yes, met state target

Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 7 for 2015-16 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 8: Parental Involvement

This district is not required to report for indicator 8 for 2015-16 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 9: Disproportionality - Identification for Special Education

Disproportionate representation in special education?

No

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 10A: Disproportionality in Specific Disability Categories

Disproportionate representation in specific disability categories?

No

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 10B: Disproportionality in Special Education Placements

Disproportionate representation in particular settings?

No

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 11: Timely Evaluations (Child Find)

Number of preschool students for whom parental consent to evaluate was received (July 1, 2015to June 30, 2016)

114

Number of preschool students whose evaluations were completed within the State established timeline

103

Number of preschool students whose evaluations were not completed within State established time lines, but for reasons that are considered to be in compliance with State requirements

9

Compliance Rate

98.2%

State Target

Target Met

100%

No, did not meet state target

Number of School-Age students for whom parental consent to evaluate was received (July 1, 2015to June 30, 2016)

142

Number of School-Age students whose evaluations were completed within the State established timeline

80

Number of School-Age students whose evaluations were not completed within State established time lines, but for reasons that are considered to be in compliance with State requirements

39

Compliance Rate

81.6%

State Target

Target Met

100%

No, did not meet state target

Number of Combined students for whom parental consent to evaluate was received (July 1, 2015to June 30, 2016)

256

Number of Combined students whose evaluations were completed within the State established timeline

183

Number of Combined students whose evaluations were not completed within State established time lines, but for reasons that are considered to be in compliance with State requirements

48

Compliance Rate

88%

State Target

Target Met

100%

No, did not meet state target

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

Percent of children with IEPs who transitioned from early intervention services (Part C) to preschool special education services (Part B) and received their preschool special education services by their third birthdays consistent with State law.
This district is not required to report for Indicator 12 for 2015-16 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

This district is not required to report for Indicator13 for 2015-16 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 14 for 2015-16 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

General Information

Offices at NYSED

Additional Information

  • Data Disclaimer
  • Login

Subscribe to be notified when new data is added to this site:

© Copyright New York State Education Department, all rights reserved.

This document was created on: April 26, 2024, 7:53 pm EST

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.