Skip to Content
Main content

WHEATLAND-CHILI CSD

Special Education School District Data Profile 2021-22

The Special Education School District Data Profile is prepared in accordance with the requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Each State must have a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and purposes of the implementation of IDEA.

The SPP is a six-year plan which describes New York State's performance on 17 indicators. States must report annually to the public on the performance of the State in an Annual Performance Report (APR) and each school district against the State's targets. New York State's SPP and the APR that describe these indicators in detail are available at https://www.nysed.gov/special-education/spp-apr.
The following report reflects only quantifiable data collected by the State. Since performance of a school district in any indicator may be the result of unique circumstances within a district, readers are encouraged to consider information provided by the district's administration in interpreting these data.

Wheatland-Chili Central School District

2021-22

Enrollment and Classification Rate

District Enrollment: 815
School-Age Students with Disabilities and Classification Rate

99

12.1%

Preschool Students with Disabilities

6

Indicator 1: Graduation Rate of Students with Disabilities

2020-21 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Graduation rate

10

100%

State Target

Target Met

71% or higher

Yes, met state target

* Data are suppressed when a district has fewer than 5 exiters.

† Data for indicator 1 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 2: Drop-Out Rate of Students with Disabilities

2020-21 School Year

Students with Disabilities and Drop Out rate

10

0%

State Target

Target Met

19.37% or lower

Yes, met state target

* Data are suppressed when a district has fewer than 5 exiters.

† Data for indicator 2 are lagged 1 year.

Indicator 3: State Assessments

(Note: Data are suppressed when fewer than 5 students with disabilities are enrolled in a district.)

A. Participation rate for students with disabilities

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

9

100%

State Target

Target Met

95%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

8

75%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and participation rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

95%

—

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

9

100%

State Target

Target Met

95%

Yes, meets state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

8

75%

State Target

Target Met

95%

No, did not meet state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and participation rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

95%

—

B. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

0%

State Target

Target Met

14.90%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

6

0%

State Target

Target Met

13.23%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

72.04%

—

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

0%

State Target

Target Met

18.14%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

6

0%

State Target

Target Met

10.50%

No, did not meet state target

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

64.11%

—

C. Proficiency rate for students with disabilities against alternate academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

89.16%

—

Grade 8 ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

81.65%

—

High School ELA

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

73.46%

—

Grade 4 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

81.41%

—

Grade 8 Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

75.60%

—

High School Math

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

State Target

Target Met

76.83%

—

D. Gap in proficiency rates for students with disabilities and for all students against grade level academic achievement standards

Grade 4 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

53

33.96%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

0%

Proficiency Gap

33.96%

State Target

Target Met

31.84%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 ELA

All students and proficiency rate

36

52.78%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

6

0%

Proficiency Gap

52.78%

State Target

Target Met

33.94%

No, did not meet state target

High School ELA

All students and proficiency rate

—

—

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

Proficiency Gap

—

State Target

Target Met

21.24%

—

Grade 4 Math

All students and proficiency rate

56

44.64%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

7

0%

Proficiency Gap

44.64%

State Target

Target Met

31.25%

No, did not meet state target

Grade 8 Math

All students and proficiency rate

37

18.92%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

6

0%

Proficiency Gap

18.92%

State Target

Target Met

34.69%

Yes, meets state target

High School Math

All students and proficiency rate

40

90%

Students with disabilities and proficiency rate

—

—

Proficiency Gap

—

State Target

Target Met

27%

—

Indicator 4A: Suspension Rate

(based on 2020-21 school year data)

Students with Disabilities: 106
Suspension Rate 2021-22

Students with Disabilities Suspended Out-of-School for More than 10 Days and Percentage

0

0%

State Threshold

Threshold Met

2.7% or lower

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 4B: Significant Discrepancy by Race and Ethnicity in Suspension Rate

(based on 2020-21 school year data)

Suspension Rate 2021-22

Did the school district have significant discrepancy?

NO

State threshold for 2021-22

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 5: School-age Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilities ages 5 in kindergarten to 21: 98
Students with 80% or more of the day in a general education program

67.3%

State Target

Target Met

Greater than or equal to 58.25%

Yes, met state target

Students with Less than 40% of the day in a general education program

4.1%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 18%

Yes, met state target

  Students with disabilities in separate settings

7.1%

State Target

Target Met

Less than or equal to 5.1%

No, did not meet state target

Indicator 6: Preschool Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)

Total Students with Disabilites ages 3 and 4 and 5 not in kindergarten: 7
Students with disabilities with measurement A

71.4%

State Target

Target Met

39.5% or higher

Yes, met state target

Students with disabilities with measurement B

14.3%

State Target

Target Met

29.8% or lower

Yes, met state target

Students with disabilities with measurement C

0%

State Target

Target Met

11.0% or lower

Yes, met state target

Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 7 for 2021-22 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 8: Parental Involvement

This district is not required to report for indicator 8 for 2021-22 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 9: Disproportionality - Identification for Special Education

Disproportionate representation in special education?

No

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 10A: Disproportionality in Specific Disability Categories

Disproportionate representation in specific disability categories?

No

State Threshold

Threshold Met

No school districts will have disproportionality that is the result of inappropriate policies, practices and procedures.

Yes, met state threshold

Indicator 11: Timely Evaluations (Child Find)

This district is not required to report for indicator 11 for 2021-22 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition

Percent of children with IEPs who transitioned from early intervention services (Part C) to preschool special education services (Part B) and received their preschool special education services by their third birthdays consistent with State law.
This district is not required to report for Indicator 12 for 2021-22 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

Indicator 13: Secondary Transition

Number of IEPs reviewed for students ages 15 and above

30

PERCENT OF YOUTH AGED 15 AND ABOVE WHO HAVE IEPS WITH APPROPRIATE TRANSITION PLANS

100%

State Target

Target Met

100%

Yes, met state target

Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes

This district is not required to report for Indicator 14 for 2021-22 please see http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/data.htm#subschedule for the school year in which this school district will report data for this indicator.

General Information

Offices at NYSED

Additional Information

  • Data Disclaimer
  • Login

Subscribe to be notified when new data is added to this site:

© Copyright New York State Education Department, all rights reserved.

This document was created on: December 7, 2024, 6:46 am EST

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.