Skip to Content
Main content

MT MORRIS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

125

50%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

130

52%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

47

45%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

59

50%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

78

54%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

71

53%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

78

45%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

34

63%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

43

68%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

84

42%

LEVEL 2

76

38%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

93

44%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

41

89%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

37

95%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

22

96%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

30

37%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

29

38%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

95

57%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

101

58%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

121

50%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

121

51%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.