Skip to Content
Main content

BRIARCLIFF MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

98

26%

LEVEL 3

142

38%

LEVEL 4

114

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

148

42%

LEVEL 4

86

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

53

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

44

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

61

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

81

43%

LEVEL 4

42

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

17

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

12

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

126

39%

LEVEL 4

94

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

128

42%

LEVEL 4

71

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

139

41%

LEVEL 4

112

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

143

44%

LEVEL 4

84

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

23

59%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

10

32%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.