RED CREEK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

157

37%

LEVEL 2

167

39%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

157

39%

LEVEL 2

141

35%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

93

40%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

107

47%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

149

36%

LEVEL 2

160

39%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

148

38%

LEVEL 2

139

36%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

86

25%

LEVEL 2

152

45%

LEVEL 3

72

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

138

43%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

71

83%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

73

94%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

120

49%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

115

52%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.