ARROWHEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

67

22%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

68

47%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

19

43%

LEVEL 4

11

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

16

46%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

123

41%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

109

42%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

130

43%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

117

46%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

49

72%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

40

70%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

117

43%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.