VAN ANTWERP MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

127

30%

LEVEL 4

123

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

94

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

86

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

58

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

84

42%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

26

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

93

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

89

29%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

122

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

115

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.