Skip to Content
Main content

PULASKI CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

198

39%

LEVEL 2

193

38%

LEVEL 3

99

19%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

189

39%

LEVEL 2

200

41%

LEVEL 3

86

18%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

112

42%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

118

46%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

187

38%

LEVEL 2

190

38%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

183

39%

LEVEL 2

193

41%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

146

32%

LEVEL 2

183

40%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

133

31%

LEVEL 2

191

45%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

52

84%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

56

86%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

73

31%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

125

45%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

123

43%

LEVEL 2

122

43%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.