FABIUS-POMPEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

132

41%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

47

29%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

71

24%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

54

18%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

95

31%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

126

44%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

28

80%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

41

40%

LEVEL 2

38

37%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

39

37%

LEVEL 2

49

46%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.