Skip to Content
Main content

HOLLAND PATENT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

169

25%

LEVEL 2

263

39%

LEVEL 3

173

26%

LEVEL 4

71

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

187

29%

LEVEL 2

234

37%

LEVEL 3

151

24%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

118

35%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

162

25%

LEVEL 2

254

39%

LEVEL 3

164

25%

LEVEL 4

71

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

212
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

177

29%

LEVEL 2

229

37%

LEVEL 3

144

23%

LEVEL 4

68

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

88

15%

LEVEL 2

238

42%

LEVEL 3

171

30%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

95

18%

LEVEL 2

216

41%

LEVEL 3

149

28%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

81

75%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

92

82%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

164

39%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

88

22%

LEVEL 2

157

39%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

97

38%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.