Skip to Content
Main content

BARKER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

102

26%

LEVEL 2

162

42%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

120

33%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

81

43%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

85

48%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

70

36%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

78

42%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

142

41%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

103

32%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

155

44%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

149

47%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

38

88%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

87

48%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

72

41%

LEVEL 2

79

45%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

121
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

100

26%

LEVEL 2

158

42%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

118

33%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.