Skip to Content
Main content

PS 156 LAURELTON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

166

38%

LEVEL 2

192

44%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

137

42%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

65

32%

LEVEL 2

86

42%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

55

36%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

106

46%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

156

39%

LEVEL 2

176

44%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

126

42%

LEVEL 2

123

41%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

112

32%

LEVEL 2

170

48%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

96

37%

LEVEL 2

113

43%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

54

65%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

41

62%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

53

36%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

34

47%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

113

39%

LEVEL 2

132

46%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

114

45%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.