Skip to Content
Main content

PS 153 HELEN KELLER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

10

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

42

74%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

38

75%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

39

35%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.