Skip to Content
Main content

H B MATTLIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

77

10%

LEVEL 2

246

33%

LEVEL 3

259

35%

LEVEL 4

153

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

208

36%

LEVEL 3

197

34%

LEVEL 4

95

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

216
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

142

41%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

196
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

117

30%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

53

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

21

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

22

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

356
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

72

11%

LEVEL 2

215

33%

LEVEL 3

229

36%

LEVEL 4

127

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

242
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

61

13%

LEVEL 2

170

36%

LEVEL 3

171

36%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

207

33%

LEVEL 3

249

40%

LEVEL 4

148

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

185

36%

LEVEL 3

190

37%

LEVEL 4

93

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

55

50%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

398
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 697

LEVEL 1

73

10%

LEVEL 2

226

32%

LEVEL 3

250

36%

LEVEL 4

148

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

191

35%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

20

53%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.