Skip to Content
Main content

EAST ROCHESTER UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

135

27%

LEVEL 2

186

38%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

139

30%

LEVEL 2

170

37%

LEVEL 3

103

22%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

86

34%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

83

34%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

97

25%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

21

45%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

17

43%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

168

42%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

69

78%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

65

76%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

112

43%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.