Skip to Content
Main content

ATTICA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

208

31%

LEVEL 2

255

38%

LEVEL 3

138

21%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 605

LEVEL 1

204

34%

LEVEL 2

232

38%

LEVEL 3

121

20%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

74

27%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

130

37%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

130

40%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

202

31%

LEVEL 2

250

39%

LEVEL 3

135

21%

LEVEL 4

59

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

197

34%

LEVEL 2

227

39%

LEVEL 3

117

20%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

135

24%

LEVEL 2

235

41%

LEVEL 3

136

24%

LEVEL 4

63

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

141

27%

LEVEL 2

219

42%

LEVEL 3

119

23%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

73

76%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

63

79%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

93

22%

LEVEL 2

167

40%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

102

27%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

115

46%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.