Skip to Content
Main content

CAZENOVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 693

LEVEL 1

90

13%

LEVEL 2

214

31%

LEVEL 3

254

37%

LEVEL 4

135

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

88

14%

LEVEL 2

224

35%

LEVEL 3

212

33%

LEVEL 4

123

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

135

40%

LEVEL 4

77

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

74

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

177
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

154
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

366
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

84

13%

LEVEL 2

205

31%

LEVEL 3

243

37%

LEVEL 4

123

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

317
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

76

12%

LEVEL 2

220

36%

LEVEL 3

204

33%

LEVEL 4

113

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

383
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

54

9%

LEVEL 2

190

30%

LEVEL 3

249

40%

LEVEL 4

134

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

51

9%

LEVEL 2

207

35%

LEVEL 3

210

36%

LEVEL 4

122

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

36

55%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

37

65%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

357
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

168

29%

LEVEL 3

226

38%

LEVEL 4

131

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

315
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

52

9%

LEVEL 2

191

34%

LEVEL 3

199

36%

LEVEL 4

116

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

27

26%

LEVEL 2

46

44%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

36

40%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.