WAYLAND-COHOCTON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

175

27%

LEVEL 2

270

42%

LEVEL 3

145

22%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

173

28%

LEVEL 2

257

42%

LEVEL 3

145

24%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

76

24%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

70

24%

LEVEL 2

120

40%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

149

45%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

103

32%

LEVEL 2

137

43%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

173

27%

LEVEL 2

261

41%

LEVEL 3

140

22%

LEVEL 4

56

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

167

28%

LEVEL 2

250

42%

LEVEL 3

141

24%

LEVEL 4

39

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

127

22%

LEVEL 2

259

44%

LEVEL 3

144

25%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

123

22%

LEVEL 2

254

45%

LEVEL 3

142

25%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

48

80%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

50

89%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

132

41%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

114

35%

LEVEL 2

138

42%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

138

37%

LEVEL 2

158

43%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.