Skip to Content
Main content

LIVONIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

85

21%

LEVEL 2

155

38%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

148

41%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

81

21%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

86

25%

LEVEL 2

142

41%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

149

41%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

146

45%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

31

82%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

33

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

100

40%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

41

36%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.