Skip to Content
Main content

BEAVER RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

95

26%

LEVEL 2

150

41%

LEVEL 3

96

26%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

151

40%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

62

34%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

147

41%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

146

40%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

139

44%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

56

17%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

40

75%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.