Skip to Content
Main content

GENERAL BROWN JUNIOR-SENIOR HS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

75

34%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

27

24%

LEVEL 2

44

39%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

44

42%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

28

23%

LEVEL 2

53

44%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

50

42%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

21

78%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

30

22%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

32

39%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

45

53%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.