Skip to Content
Main content

MOUNT MARKHAM CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

193

36%

LEVEL 2

205

38%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

181

37%

LEVEL 2

204

42%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

71

27%

LEVEL 2

110

42%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

71

30%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

122

44%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

190

36%

LEVEL 2

196

37%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

179

38%

LEVEL 2

196

41%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

113

26%

LEVEL 2

190

43%

LEVEL 3

107

24%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

187

48%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

80

80%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

78

80%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

136

45%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

124

48%

LEVEL 2

111

43%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.