Skip to Content
Main content

LITTLE FALLS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

130

51%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

78

31%

LEVEL 2

115

46%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

70

53%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

65

50%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

48

38%

LEVEL 2

60

48%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

54

45%

LEVEL 2

50

41%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

125

52%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

43

20%

LEVEL 2

122

56%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

110

51%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

30

86%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

68

56%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

49

44%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

55

40%

LEVEL 2

62

46%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

55

40%

LEVEL 2

66

48%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.