Skip to Content
Main content

COXSACKIE-ATHENS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

133

31%

LEVEL 2

169

40%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

123

33%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

77

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

58

27%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

75

36%

LEVEL 2

87

41%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

74

41%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

115

31%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

103

31%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

11

58%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

164

43%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

37

88%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

96

43%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

77

40%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

74

48%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.