Skip to Content
Main content

CAIRO-DURHAM CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

251

44%

LEVEL 2

208

36%

LEVEL 3

99

17%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

221

43%

LEVEL 2

190

37%

LEVEL 3

87

17%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

107

35%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

104

38%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

144

53%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

117

49%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

199

42%

LEVEL 2

169

36%

LEVEL 3

89

19%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

180

42%

LEVEL 2

156

36%

LEVEL 3

77

18%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

26

45%

LEVEL 2

28

48%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

19

45%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

179

36%

LEVEL 2

203

41%

LEVEL 3

97

20%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

156

35%

LEVEL 2

185

42%

LEVEL 3

87

20%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

72

91%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

65

92%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

107

42%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

176

55%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

161

55%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.