GLOVERSVILLE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 629

LEVEL 1

280

45%

LEVEL 2

249

40%

LEVEL 3

75

12%

LEVEL 4

25

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

296

47%

LEVEL 2

242

38%

LEVEL 3

79

12%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

128

41%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

139

44%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

152

48%

LEVEL 2

130

41%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

157

49%

LEVEL 2

128

40%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

250

44%

LEVEL 2

219

39%

LEVEL 3

72

13%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

260

46%

LEVEL 2

210

37%

LEVEL 3

76

13%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

21

53%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

169

33%

LEVEL 2

239

47%

LEVEL 3

75

15%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

184

36%

LEVEL 2

227

45%

LEVEL 3

78

15%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

111

92%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

112

88%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

93

47%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

83

49%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

228

53%

LEVEL 2

156

36%

LEVEL 3

32

7%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

248

53%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.