SALMON RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

361

54%

LEVEL 2

233

35%

LEVEL 3

67

10%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

350

52%

LEVEL 2

227

34%

LEVEL 3

76

11%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

145

44%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

143

43%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

216

64%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

20

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

207

61%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

44
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

245

56%

LEVEL 2

151

34%

LEVEL 3

42

10%

LEVEL 4

2

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

240

54%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

50

11%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

112

52%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

109

48%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

268

48%

LEVEL 2

226

40%

LEVEL 3

64

11%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

261

45%

LEVEL 2

219

38%

LEVEL 3

73

13%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

93

90%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

89

88%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

40

30%

LEVEL 2

54

40%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

326

58%

LEVEL 2

188

34%

LEVEL 3

40

7%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

310

57%

LEVEL 2

173

32%

LEVEL 3

48

9%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

72
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

358

54%

LEVEL 2

232

35%

LEVEL 3

66

10%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

98
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

344

52%

LEVEL 2

225

34%

LEVEL 3

76

11%

LEVEL 4

22

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.