Skip to Content
Main content

HOMER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 946

LEVEL 1

295

31%

LEVEL 2

339

36%

LEVEL 3

221

23%

LEVEL 4

91

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 921

LEVEL 1

315

34%

LEVEL 2

365

40%

LEVEL 3

179

19%

LEVEL 4

62

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

104

23%

LEVEL 2

169

38%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

116

27%

LEVEL 2

190

44%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

191

38%

LEVEL 2

170

34%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

199

41%

LEVEL 2

175

36%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

299
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 917

LEVEL 1

288

31%

LEVEL 2

330

36%

LEVEL 3

212

23%

LEVEL 4

87

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 888

LEVEL 1

300

34%

LEVEL 2

355

40%

LEVEL 3

175

20%

LEVEL 4

58

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 796

LEVEL 1

180

23%

LEVEL 2

309

39%

LEVEL 3

217

27%

LEVEL 4

90

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 792

LEVEL 1

214

27%

LEVEL 2

340

43%

LEVEL 3

177

22%

LEVEL 4

61

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

115

77%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

101

78%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

246
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

114

20%

LEVEL 2

215

37%

LEVEL 3

164

29%

LEVEL 4

82

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

110

21%

LEVEL 2

217

42%

LEVEL 3

138

26%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

181

49%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

205

51%

LEVEL 2

148

37%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.