Skip to Content
Main content

PERU CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 845

LEVEL 1

315

37%

LEVEL 2

318

38%

LEVEL 3

165

20%

LEVEL 4

47

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

275

43%

LEVEL 2

205

32%

LEVEL 3

128

20%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

136

33%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

179

41%

LEVEL 2

160

37%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

159

50%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 794

LEVEL 1

293

37%

LEVEL 2

304

38%

LEVEL 3

154

19%

LEVEL 4

43

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

266

44%

LEVEL 2

192

32%

LEVEL 3

123

20%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

202

28%

LEVEL 2

309

43%

LEVEL 3

160

22%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

195

38%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

113

89%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

111

90%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

198

42%

LEVEL 3

124

26%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

205

56%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

159

60%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.