Skip to Content
Main content

GREENE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

131

28%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

116

25%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

155

33%

LEVEL 2

159

34%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

87

38%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

83

36%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

126

29%

LEVEL 2

165

38%

LEVEL 3

114

26%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

144

33%

LEVEL 2

149

34%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

63

17%

LEVEL 2

151

41%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

78

21%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

102

28%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

68

70%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

77

81%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

91

40%

LEVEL 2

89

39%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.