Skip to Content
Main content

CATO-MERIDIAN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

175

36%

LEVEL 2

203

42%

LEVEL 3

82

17%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

159

37%

LEVEL 2

172

40%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

91

38%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

94

38%

LEVEL 2

112

45%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

97

43%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

157

35%

LEVEL 2

194

43%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

136

35%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

202

45%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

123

31%

LEVEL 2

171

44%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

41

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

36

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

121

44%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

74

30%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

100

47%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

85

46%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.