Skip to Content
Main content

GOWANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

267

45%

LEVEL 2

218

37%

LEVEL 3

90

15%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

265

48%

LEVEL 2

202

37%

LEVEL 3

71

13%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

107

38%

LEVEL 2

116

41%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

160

52%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

150

53%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

19

54%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

95

61%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

95

66%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

150

39%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

143

40%

LEVEL 2

145

41%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

185

37%

LEVEL 2

209

42%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

189

41%

LEVEL 2

192

41%

LEVEL 3

69

15%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

82

90%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

76

86%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

101

39%

LEVEL 2

101

39%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

74

34%

LEVEL 2

98

45%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

166

50%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

191

57%

LEVEL 2

104

31%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.