GOWANDA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

185

47%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

186

50%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

76

39%

LEVEL 2

84

43%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

79

42%

LEVEL 2

82

44%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

109

55%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

107

57%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

14

58%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

60

62%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

68

69%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

138

40%

LEVEL 2

142

42%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

140

43%

LEVEL 2

137

42%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

47

90%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

46

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

61

39%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

66

46%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

124

52%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

138

60%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.