Skip to Content
Main content

HARPURSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

179

43%

LEVEL 2

158

38%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

158

40%

LEVEL 2

155

39%

LEVEL 3

64

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

74

36%

LEVEL 2

81

40%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

105

49%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

95

46%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

168

42%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

152

40%

LEVEL 2

149

39%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

118

34%

LEVEL 2

147

42%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

147

46%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

61

84%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

64

86%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

67

41%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

40

33%

LEVEL 2

54

45%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

126

49%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

118

43%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.