Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

121

43%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

119

45%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

58

44%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

67

44%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

32

28%

LEVEL 2

52

45%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

115

43%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

56

23%

LEVEL 2

110

45%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

109

47%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

108

48%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

35

71%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

29

71%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

72

45%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

41

41%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

47

44%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.