Skip to Content
Main content

CANISTEO-GREENWOOD CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

171

39%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

148

36%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

166

39%

LEVEL 2

162

38%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

138

34%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

160

43%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

99

28%

LEVEL 2

154

43%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

65

89%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

118

51%

LEVEL 2

82

35%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

102

46%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.