ESSEX COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,607

LEVEL 1

515

32%

LEVEL 2

633

39%

LEVEL 3

323

20%

LEVEL 4

136

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

414
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,369

LEVEL 1

442

32%

LEVEL 2

513

37%

LEVEL 3

316

23%

LEVEL 4

98

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

266
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

220

28%

LEVEL 2

309

39%

LEVEL 3

175

22%

LEVEL 4

91

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

248
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

175

26%

LEVEL 2

250

37%

LEVEL 3

189

28%

LEVEL 4

59

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

193
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 812

LEVEL 1

295

36%

LEVEL 2

324

40%

LEVEL 3

148

18%

LEVEL 4

45

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

267

38%

LEVEL 2

263

38%

LEVEL 3

127

18%

LEVEL 4

39

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

433
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,536

LEVEL 1

492

32%

LEVEL 2

611

40%

LEVEL 3

303

20%

LEVEL 4

130

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

401
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,325

LEVEL 1

428

32%

LEVEL 2

496

37%

LEVEL 3

308

23%

LEVEL 4

93

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,320

LEVEL 1

286

22%

LEVEL 2

584

44%

LEVEL 3

317

24%

LEVEL 4

133

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

405
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,167

LEVEL 1

290

25%

LEVEL 2

472

40%

LEVEL 3

307

26%

LEVEL 4

98

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

229

80%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

152

75%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

305
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 813

LEVEL 1

198

24%

LEVEL 2

310

38%

LEVEL 3

212

26%

LEVEL 4

93

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

286
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

139

21%

LEVEL 2

249

37%

LEVEL 3

213

32%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 794

LEVEL 1

317

40%

LEVEL 2

323

41%

LEVEL 3

111

14%

LEVEL 4

43

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

303

44%

LEVEL 2

264

38%

LEVEL 3

103

15%

LEVEL 4

25

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.