LEWIS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

573
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,869

LEVEL 1

614

33%

LEVEL 2

682

36%

LEVEL 3

419

22%

LEVEL 4

154

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,734

LEVEL 1

609

35%

LEVEL 2

653

38%

LEVEL 3

344

20%

LEVEL 4

128

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

335
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 927

LEVEL 1

240

26%

LEVEL 2

352

38%

LEVEL 3

231

25%

LEVEL 4

104

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

289
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 851

LEVEL 1

249

29%

LEVEL 2

313

37%

LEVEL 3

200

24%

LEVEL 4

89

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

238
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 942

LEVEL 1

374

40%

LEVEL 2

330

35%

LEVEL 3

188

20%

LEVEL 4

50

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

183
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 883

LEVEL 1

360

41%

LEVEL 2

340

39%

LEVEL 3

144

16%

LEVEL 4

39

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

551
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,785

LEVEL 1

577

32%

LEVEL 2

657

37%

LEVEL 3

399

22%

LEVEL 4

152

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

452
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,660

LEVEL 1

582

35%

LEVEL 2

626

38%

LEVEL 3

327

20%

LEVEL 4

125

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

571
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,584

LEVEL 1

373

24%

LEVEL 2

640

40%

LEVEL 3

417

26%

LEVEL 4

154

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

469
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,452

LEVEL 1

372

26%

LEVEL 2

611

42%

LEVEL 3

342

24%

LEVEL 4

127

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

241

85%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

237

84%

LEVEL 2

42

15%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

365
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 930

LEVEL 1

218

23%

LEVEL 2

347

37%

LEVEL 3

248

27%

LEVEL 4

117

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

304
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

211

27%

LEVEL 2

280

35%

LEVEL 3

213

27%

LEVEL 4

91

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 939

LEVEL 1

396

42%

LEVEL 2

335

36%

LEVEL 3

171

18%

LEVEL 4

37

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 939

LEVEL 1

398

42%

LEVEL 2

373

40%

LEVEL 3

131

14%

LEVEL 4

37

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.