Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH BUFFALO CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

179

42%

LEVEL 2

168

39%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

181

41%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

82

18%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

87

38%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

102

43%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

92

47%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

107

51%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

87

38%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

56

52%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

54

47%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

31

45%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

37

40%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

143

39%

LEVEL 2

146

40%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

141

36%

LEVEL 2

163

42%

LEVEL 3

76

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

22

36%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

40

71%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

177

40%

LEVEL 2

170

39%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

30

49%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

53

35%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

165

45%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.