MT PLEASANT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 885

LEVEL 1

137

15%

LEVEL 2

351

40%

LEVEL 3

300

34%

LEVEL 4

97

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

88

16%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

218
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

160

37%

LEVEL 3

161

38%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

95

40%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

191

42%

LEVEL 3

139

30%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

352
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 779

LEVEL 1

123

16%

LEVEL 2

304

39%

LEVEL 3

272

35%

LEVEL 4

80

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

161

35%

LEVEL 4

60

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

33

50%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

21

36%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

57

7%

LEVEL 2

320

42%

LEVEL 3

294

38%

LEVEL 4

97

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

192

39%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

80

68%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

40

65%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

397
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 875

LEVEL 1

132

15%

LEVEL 2

346

40%

LEVEL 3

300

34%

LEVEL 4

97

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

265
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

84

16%

LEVEL 2

192

35%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

384
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

117

14%

LEVEL 2

322

39%

LEVEL 3

289

35%

LEVEL 4

95

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

71

14%

LEVEL 2

173

35%

LEVEL 3

186

38%

LEVEL 4

64

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

29

47%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

23

42%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.